Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Optimized Contrast-Enhanced CT Protocols for Diagnostic Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT: Technical Aspects of Single-Phase Versus Multiphase CT Imaging

Klaus Brechtel, Magnus Klein, Monika Vogel, Marc Mueller, Philip Aschoff, Thomas Beyer, Susanna M. Eschmann, Roland Bares, Claus D. Claussen and Anna C. Pfannenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2006, 47 (3) 470-476;
Klaus Brechtel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Magnus Klein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monika Vogel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Mueller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Aschoff
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Beyer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susanna M. Eschmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland Bares
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claus D. Claussen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna C. Pfannenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    PET/CT protocols for single-phase (A) and multiphase (B) examinations. For protocol A, purple spiral represents whole body in portal-venous contrast enhancement. Scan range included base of skull to proximal thigh, as in PET (blue cylinder). For protocol B, 2 examination protocols had to be implemented because of technical standards of scanner. After injection and bolus tracking of contrast medium, first CT scan covered base of skull to lower borders of kidneys (red spiral). At 90 s after injection, CT ranging from base of lungs to proximal thighs was performed in portal-venous contrast enhancement phase (purple spiral). After short reconstruction interval, attenuation LD-CT (gray spiral) and PET were performed. Thickness of spiral lines indicates dose (thick line: 160 mAs; thin line: 30 mAs); width of spirals indicates collimation (narrow: 0.75; wide: 1.5).

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Comparison of misalignment of contrast-enhanced CT examinations for protocols A, B, C, and D. Protocol B (NormExp; single phase) had significantly lowest values for all abdominal organs. Significant differences between multiphase protocols (C and D) could not be assessed. art = arterial; p-v = portal-venous. • = individual values; + = mean values. Error bars indicate SDs.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    Occurrence of image artifacts caused by breathing and severe mismatching caused by movements of patient in between CT and PET scans. Mismatching was distributed equally among protocols, whereas image quality correlated strongly with breathing protocols. NormExp protocols (B and D) had significantly lower occurrences of artifacts and, therefore, superior image quality. art = arterial; p-v = portal-venous.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    Multiphase PET/CT. Comparison of misalignment in protocol C (A) and protocol D (B). LD-CT attenuation scans were performed during shallow breathing. However, with regard to misalignment in liver, values for LD-CT were significantly lower. For protocol D, contrast-enhanced CT scan during NormExp did not show superiority over LD-CT scan during shallow breathing. Instead, values for LD-CT were significantly lower than those for arterial phase for liver. LD = low dose; ART = arterial; P-V = portal-venous. • = individual values; + = mean values. Error bars indicate SDs.

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    Comparison of CT attenuation scans. Protocol B showed lowest values for misalignment in all organs. Attenuation scans with protocol C (C LD) and protocol D (D LD) showed values similar to those with protocol A, as expected. • = individual values; + = mean values. Error bars indicate SDs.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Anthropometric and Examination Data for Various Protocols

    Data for following protocol:
    ParameterABCD
    Contrast phaseSingleSingleMultiMulti
    Breathing protocolShallowNormExpShallowNormExp
    No. of patients1513*1515
    Age (y)†57.9 ± 13.153.5 ± 14.965.4 ± 9.255.3 ± 16.9
    No. of men/women9/68/511/49/6
    Body mass index (kg/m2)†27.2 ± 5.825.9 ± 3.224.8 ± 2.923.9 ± 3.7
    Activity (MBq)†432 ± 26402 ± 34429 ± 31390 ± 59
    Uptake time (min)†72.5 ± 13.066.5 ± 11.180.9 ± 17.171.9 ± 10.3
    No. of beds†7.3 ± 0.87.0 ± 0.67.1 ± 0.77.5 ± 0.6
    Bed time (min)†3.1 ± 0.433.1 ± 0.33
    • ↵* Two cases were not included because of archiving problems.

    • ↵† Mean ± SD.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Pathologic Entities for Study Population and Distribution Within Protocols

    No. in following protocol:
    Pathologic entitiesABCD
    Genitourinary tumors3326
    Tumors of bowel and intestines1221
    Esophageal cancer0100
    Stomach cancer1001
    Breast cancer1120
    Cancer of unknown primary source2201
    Head and neck tumors1021
    Lung cancer1221
    Melanoma0011
    Pancreatic tumor0001
    Lymphoma4231
    Inflammatory diseases1211
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 3
March 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optimized Contrast-Enhanced CT Protocols for Diagnostic Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT: Technical Aspects of Single-Phase Versus Multiphase CT Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Optimized Contrast-Enhanced CT Protocols for Diagnostic Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT: Technical Aspects of Single-Phase Versus Multiphase CT Imaging
Klaus Brechtel, Magnus Klein, Monika Vogel, Marc Mueller, Philip Aschoff, Thomas Beyer, Susanna M. Eschmann, Roland Bares, Claus D. Claussen, Anna C. Pfannenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2006, 47 (3) 470-476;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Optimized Contrast-Enhanced CT Protocols for Diagnostic Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT: Technical Aspects of Single-Phase Versus Multiphase CT Imaging
Klaus Brechtel, Magnus Klein, Monika Vogel, Marc Mueller, Philip Aschoff, Thomas Beyer, Susanna M. Eschmann, Roland Bares, Claus D. Claussen, Anna C. Pfannenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2006, 47 (3) 470-476;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Whole-Body PET/MRI: Quantitative Evaluation of Segmentation- and Atlas-Based Methods
  • Dual-Modality Imaging: Combining Anatomy and Function
  • Limitations of CT During PET/CT
  • Value of contrast-enhanced multiphase CT in combined PET/CT protocols for oncological imaging
  • Evaluation of Image Registration in PET/CT of the Liver and Recommendations for Optimized Imaging
  • Adequate Evaluation of Image Registration in Hybrid PET/CT
  • Reply: Adequate Evaluation of Image Registration in Hybrid PET/CT.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PET/MRI of Hypoxic Atherosclerosis Using 64Cu-ATSM in a Rabbit Model
  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
  • How Sensitive Is the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract to 90Y Radioembolization? A Histologic and Dosimetric Analysis in a Porcine Model
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire