Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Adrenal Masses

Ur Metser, Elka Miller, Hedva Lerman, Gennady Lievshitz, Shmuel Avital and Einat Even-Sapir
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2006, 47 (1) 32-37;
Ur Metser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elka Miller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hedva Lerman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gennady Lievshitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shmuel Avital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Einat Even-Sapir
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, using data from both the PET and the unenhanced CT portions of the study, in characterizing adrenal masses in oncology patients. Methods: One hundred seventy-five adrenal masses in 150 patients referred for 18F-FDG PET/CT were assessed. Final diagnosis was based on histology (n = 6), imaging follow-up (n = 118) of 6–29 mo (mean, 14 mo), or morphologic imaging criteria (n = 51). Each adrenal mass was characterized by its size; its attenuation on CT, expressed by Hounsfield units (HU); and the intensity of 18F-FDG uptake, expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV). Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to determine the optimal cutoff values of HU and SUV that would best discriminate between benign and malignant masses. Results: When malignant lesions were compared with adenomas, PET data alone using an SUV cutoff of 3.1 yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 98.5%, 92%, 89.3%, 98.9%, respectively. For combined PET/CT data, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, 98%, 97%, 100%, respectively. Specificity was significantly higher for PET/CT (P < 0.01). Fifty-one of the 175 masses were 1.5 cm or less in diameter. When a cutoff SUV of 3.1 was used for this group, 18F-FDG PET/CT correctly classified all lesions. Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the performance of 18F-FDG PET alone in discriminating benign from malignant adrenal lesions in oncology patients.

  • adrenal mass
  • adenoma
  • 18F-FDG
  • PET/CT
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 1
January 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Adrenal Masses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Adrenal Masses
Ur Metser, Elka Miller, Hedva Lerman, Gennady Lievshitz, Shmuel Avital, Einat Even-Sapir
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2006, 47 (1) 32-37;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Adrenal Masses
Ur Metser, Elka Miller, Hedva Lerman, Gennady Lievshitz, Shmuel Avital, Einat Even-Sapir
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2006, 47 (1) 32-37;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • THIS MONTH IN JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Lung cancer staging: a concise update
  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the adrenal gland: a rare cause of primary adrenal insufficiency
  • Utilisation of combined 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant adrenal enlargement
  • AME Position Statement on adrenal incidentaloma
  • Assessment of Patient Exposure to X-Radiation from SPECT/CT Scanners
  • Adrenal Masses in the Cancer Patient: Surveillance or Excision
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire