Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBasic Science Investigations

Inflammation and Infection: Imaging Properties of 18F-FDG–Labeled White Blood Cells Versus 18F-FDG

Daniela Pellegrino, Ali A. Bonab, Stephen C. Dragotakes, Justin T. Pitman, Giuliano Mariani and Edward A. Carter
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2005, 46 (9) 1522-1530;
Daniela Pellegrino
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali A. Bonab
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen C. Dragotakes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin T. Pitman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giuliano Mariani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward A. Carter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Outline of experimental design.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (A) Time course retention of 18F-FDG in WBCs incubated in 0.9% NaCl for extended periods at 37°C. Percentage cell-bound activity (labeling) is expressed as pellet activity/total activity ratio. (B) TLRC at 90 min after WBC labeling. Dotted lines indicate retention factor, Rf = 0 (left) and Rf = 1 (right). Center panel: 18F-FDG (Rf = 0.37) contains trace of 18F-fluoride not migrating with the mobile phase. Right panel: Lysed 18F-FDG–WBCs (similarly as 18F-fluoride, 18F-FDG-6P used as standard does not migrate with the mobile phase).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    (A) Tissue biodistribution of 18F-FDG–WBCs and 18F-FDG in turpentine model 1 h after radiotracer injection. Values are expressed as % DPG (mean ± SE). (B) Coronal images of turpentine model obtained 1 h after radiotracer injection. Arrow indicates inflammation site (animals positioned prone on imaging table). (C) Microscopic images of Giemsa-stained sterile inflamed muscle sample, collected 1 h after radiotracer injection. Abscess is characterized by central necrosis (N) and a surrounding wall (W) mainly consisting of granulocytic cells and normal muscle tissue (MT). (D) Phosphorimaging of frozen section from turpentine-injected muscle (IM) and normal muscle (NM), collected 1 h after radiotracer injection. Standard: 14C standard activity values were converted to 18F activity in MBq/g by using a calibration curve. Control: NM 18F-FDG–WBC, tissue uptake = 0.22 kBq/g. 18F-FDG–WBC: IM 18F-FDG–WBC, tissue uptake = 8.14 kBq/g. 18F-FDG: IM 18F-FDG, tissue uptake = 3.07 kBq/g. DPG = (injected dose/gram of tissue) × 100; GI = gastrointestinal; Inf. = infected; Uninf. = uninfected.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    (A) Tissue biodistribution of 18F-FDG–WBCs and 18F-FDG in E. coli model 1 h after radiotracer injection. Values are expressed as % DPG (mean ± SE). (B) Coronal images of E. coli model obtained 1 h after radiotracer injection. Arrow indicates infection site (animals positioned prone on imaging table). (C) Microscopic images of Giemsa-stained E. coli-injected septic muscle sample, collected 1 h after radiotracer injection. Necrosis (N) and abscess architecture showed a different organization compared with the sterile model. Numerous inflammatory cells were present in surrounding wall (W) infiltrating muscle tissue (MT). E. coli can be seen in the higher magnification. (D) Phosphorimaging of frozen section from E. coli-infected muscle (IM) and normal muscle (NM), collected 1 h after radiotracer injection. Standard: 14C standard activity values were converted to 18F activity in MBq/g by using a calibration curve. Control: NM 18F-FDG–WBC, tissue uptake = 0.1 kBq/g. 18F-FDG–WBC: IM 18F-FDG–WBC, tissue uptake = 2.035 kBq/g. 18F-FDG: IM 18F-FDG, tissue uptake = 0.99 kBq/g. DPG = (injected dose/gram of tissue) × 100; GI = gastrointestinal; Inf. = infected; Uninf. = uninfected.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    (A) Tissue biodistribution of 18F-FDG–WBCs and 18F-FDG in P. aeruginosa model 1 h after radiotracer injection. Values are expressed as % DPG (mean ± SE). (B) Coronal images of P. aeruginosa model obtained 1 h after radiotracer injection. Arrow indicates infection site (animals positioned prone on imaging table). DPG = (injected dose/gram of tissue) × 100; GI = gastrointestinal; Inf. = infected; Uninf. = uninfected.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Experimental Groups Undergoing 18F-FDG–WBC and 18F-FDG Biodistribution, microPET, and Phosphorimaging Study

    GroupNo. of animalsBiodistributionmicroPETPhosphorimaging
    18F-FDG–WBC18F-FDG18F-FDG–WBC18F-FDG18F-FDG–WBC18F-FDG
    1 Control
    154533——
    2 Sterile inflammation (turpentine)
    26663344
    3 Septic inflammation (E. coli)
    29663365
    4 Septic inflammation (P. aeruginosa)
    25663343
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Summary of IM/NM Ratios

    GroupBiodistribution*microPET†Phosphorimaging‡
    18F-FDG–WBC18F-FDG18F-FDG–WBC18F-FDG18F-FDG–WBC18F-FDG
    1 Sterile inflammation (turpentine)
    24.24 ± 3.9812.21 ± 3.6819.71 ± 0.388.04 ± 0.5921.81 ± 3.9112.85 ± 1.11
    P = 0.048P < 0.001NS
    2 Septic inflammation (E. coli)
    14.67 ± 1.8510.04 ± 0.6626.61 ± 0.0412.35 ± 0.0125.27 ± 3.9720.70 ± 3.43
    P = 0.040P < 0.001NS
    3 Septic inflammation (P. aeruginosa)
    15.62 ± 4.305.08 ± 0.9310.89 ± 0.124.35 ± 0.0910.11 ± 1.335.57 ± 0.43
    P = 0.037P < 0.001P < 0.01
    • ↵* % DPG of IM/NM ± SE, corrected for background and decay.

    • ↵† IM/NM ± SE.

    • ↵‡ Defined as SUV ratio of IM/NM ± SE.

    • NS = not significant.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 46 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 46, Issue 9
September 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inflammation and Infection: Imaging Properties of 18F-FDG–Labeled White Blood Cells Versus 18F-FDG
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Inflammation and Infection: Imaging Properties of 18F-FDG–Labeled White Blood Cells Versus 18F-FDG
Daniela Pellegrino, Ali A. Bonab, Stephen C. Dragotakes, Justin T. Pitman, Giuliano Mariani, Edward A. Carter
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2005, 46 (9) 1522-1530;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Inflammation and Infection: Imaging Properties of 18F-FDG–Labeled White Blood Cells Versus 18F-FDG
Daniela Pellegrino, Ali A. Bonab, Stephen C. Dragotakes, Justin T. Pitman, Giuliano Mariani, Edward A. Carter
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2005, 46 (9) 1522-1530;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • THIS MONTH IN JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Assessment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis with PET/CT
  • Spectrum of Restrictive and Infiltrative Cardiomyopathies: Part 2 of a 2-Part Series
  • The Potential of Clinical Phenotyping of Heart Failure With Imaging Biomarkers for Guiding Therapies: A Focused Update
  • Joint SNMMI-ASNC Expert Consensus Document on the Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Cardiac Sarcoid Detection and Therapy Monitoring
  • Cardiac Sarcoidosis
  • PET/CT with 18F-FDG-Labeled Autologous Leukocytes for the Diagnosis of Infected Fluid Collections in Acute Pancreatitis
  • PET with 18F-FDG-Labeled T Lymphocytes for Diagnosis of Acute Rat Renal Allograft Rejection
  • Translational 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging to Monitor Lesion Activity in Intestinal Inflammation
  • The Use of 18F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis Including the Ontario Experience
  • Experiences with Citrate Rather Than Heparin as an Anticoagulant for 18F-FDG Labeling of Leukocytes
  • Potential of Noninvasive Serial Assessment of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection by 18F-FDG PET to Monitor Treatment Efficiency
  • Radionuclide Imaging of Infection: In Search of the Grail
  • Imaging Infection with 18F-FDG-Labeled Leukocyte PET/CT: Initial Experience in 21 Patients
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire