Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

Quantitative Dynamic Cardiac 82Rb PET Using Generalized Factor and Compartment Analyses

Georges El Fakhri, Arkadiusz Sitek, Bastien Guérin, Marie Foley Kijewski, Marcelo F. Di Carli and Stephen C. Moore
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2005, 46 (8) 1264-1271;
Georges El Fakhri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arkadiusz Sitek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bastien Guérin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Foley Kijewski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcelo F. Di Carli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen C. Moore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Simulated RV and LV input functions and associated myocardial TACs corresponding to 3 different sets of values of k1 (mL/min/g) and k2 (min−1) as well as corresponding factors estimated with GFADS (open symbols). MYO = myocardium.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Estimated factors with VOI TACs and GFADS and GFADS-derived factor images. The 3-factor images were well separated with GFADS, whereas the LV+RV input functions were underestimated and the myocardial (MYO) TAC was overestimated with VOI TACs, due to spillover in early time points.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Estimated factors and factor images (3 transverse slices) with GFADS for a typical dynamic 82Rb PET study in 93-y-old female with known CAD but with normal myocardial perfusion (SSS = 0). Radioactive decay was not compensated. LV, RV, and myocardium (MYO) were well separated using our uniqueness constraint.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Parametric maps of myocardial tissue extraction (k1) and egress (k2) as well as RV and LV contributions (fvi, rvi) from the patient dynamic study shown in Figure 3. Note absence of aberrant points due to orthogonal grouping.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Clinical Data and Calculated Rest/Stress Myocardial Blood Flows for 13 Patients Included in Study

    Subject no.SexAge (y)Prior CADBP* (mm Hg)HR† (bpm)SSS‡k1§ (mL/min/g)CFR¶k2∥ (1/min)Catheterization results
    1F59No122/73 − 106/5079 − 9400.80 − 1.842.30.015 − 0.028NP
    2F83No99/61 − 107/5488 − 8700.69 − 1.482.140.013 − 0.024NP
    3F76No145/83 − 131/6574 − 8300.64 − 1.342.090.012 − 0.018NP
    4F93No197/50 − 166/6571 − 7500.78 (rest)—0.020 (rest)NP
    5F43No107/60 − 99/4861 − 8701.07 (rest)—0.013 (rest)NP
    6M38No141/71 − 119/5169 − 8301.82 (stress)—0.022NP
    7M65No——01.03 (rest)—0.014NP
    8M56Yes———0.61 (rest)—0.01580% LAD, 80% LCX, 90% RCA
    9M66Yes127/65 − 100/5250 − 72270.58 − 0.871.50.013 − 0.018NP
    10M81Yes138/68 − 100/5671 − 91260.52 − 0.741.430.011 − 0.014100% LAD, 90% RCA
    11F76Yes117/62 − 116/5458 − 62280.61 − 0.841.390.012 − 0.016Grafts patent
    12M60No203/98 − 127/5877 − 9740.60 − 0.941.580.013 − 0.019NP
    13M56Yes119/77 − 118/7078 − 93180.67 − 1.011.510.017 − 0.021Grafts patent
    • ↵* BP (mm Hg): rest systolic/diastolic blood pressure − peak hyperemia systolic/diastolic blood pressure.

    • ↵† HR (bpm): rest heart rate − peak heart rate (bpm).

    • ↵‡ SSS: summed stress score (<3, normal; 4–8, mildly abnormal; 9–13, moderately abnormal; 13, severely abnormal).

    • ↵§ k1 (mL/min/g): rest k1 − stress k1.

    • ↵¶ CFR: coronary flow reserve (k1 stress/k1 rest).

    • ↵∥ k2 (1/min): rest k2 − stress k2.

    • NP = not performed; LAD = left anterior descending; LCX = left circumflex artery; RCA = right coronary artery.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 46 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 46, Issue 8
August 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantitative Dynamic Cardiac 82Rb PET Using Generalized Factor and Compartment Analyses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Quantitative Dynamic Cardiac 82Rb PET Using Generalized Factor and Compartment Analyses
Georges El Fakhri, Arkadiusz Sitek, Bastien Guérin, Marie Foley Kijewski, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Stephen C. Moore
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2005, 46 (8) 1264-1271;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Quantitative Dynamic Cardiac 82Rb PET Using Generalized Factor and Compartment Analyses
Georges El Fakhri, Arkadiusz Sitek, Bastien Guérin, Marie Foley Kijewski, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Stephen C. Moore
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2005, 46 (8) 1264-1271;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • THIS MONTH IN JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Myocardial Scar But Not Ischemia Is Associated With Defibrillator Shocks and Sudden Cardiac Death in Stable Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
  • Reduced Myocardial Flow Reserve by Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Cardiovascular Events After Cardiac Transplantation
  • Integrated Noninvasive Physiological Assessment of Coronary Circulatory Function and Impact on Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease
  • Integration of Quantitative Positron Emission Tomography Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements in the Clinical Management of Coronary Artery Disease
  • Coronary Microvascular Function and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Women With Angina Pectoris and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The iPOWER Study
  • Comparison and Prognostic Validation of Multiple Methods of Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow with 82Rb PET
  • How Close Is Close Enough?
  • Prognostic Interplay of Coronary Artery Calcification and Underlying Vascular Dysfunction in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
  • Association Between Coronary Vascular Dysfunction and Cardiac Mortality in Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus
  • Coronary Vascular Dysfunction and Prognosis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Habitual dietary sodium intake is inversely associated with coronary flow reserve in middle-aged male twins
  • Improved Cardiac Risk Assessment With Noninvasive Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve
  • Quantitative Relationship Between the Extent and Morphology of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque and Downstream Myocardial Perfusion
  • Inflammation is Related to Coronary Flow Reserve Detected by Positron Emission Tomography in Asymptomatic Male Twins
  • Cardiac PET Imaging for the Detection and Monitoring of Coronary Artery Disease and Microvascular Health
  • Reproducibility and Accuracy of Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow Assessment with 82Rb PET: Comparison with 13N-Ammonia PET
  • Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography
  • Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography Measurement of Adenosine-Stimulated Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Versus Relative Myocardial Tracer Content for Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity and Location
  • Clinical Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence–Based Denoising of Low-Dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET Imaging in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire