Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherContinuing Education

PET/CT: Challenge for Nuclear Cardiology

Markus Schwaiger, Sibylle Ziegler and Stephan G. Nekolla
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2005, 46 (10) 1664-1678;
Markus Schwaiger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sibylle Ziegler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan G. Nekolla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Sample 18F-FDG study from our institution in 3D mode with both BGO and LSO as detector material demonstrates the excellent image quality provided by state-of-the-art PET/CT scanners (Biograph 16; Siemens), compared with conventional scanners (EXACT 47; Siemens). LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; RA = right atrium; RV = right ventricle.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Increased sensitivity of LSO-based PET systems is demonstrated in these dynamic series after injection of 555 MBq of 13N ammonia. The 3 top rows show long- and short-axis images of tracer uptake using conventional PET scanner (ECAT EXACT; Siemens). The 3 bottom rows show similar protocol with LSO-based system (Biograph 16; Siemens). Note increased signal-to-noise ratio and improved delineation of cardiac structures during 10-s frames in PET/CT data.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Influence of respiratory gating on cardiac motion is demonstrated in this 13N-ammonia study. With acquisition time of 10 min after tracer injection, list-mode data from 2 to 10 min were charted by histogram into 6 respiratory and 2 cardiac cycles. Images show end-diastolic frames in end inspiration and end expiration. Approximated, most apical position in both respiratory states is marked with yellow line. Maximal spatial difference is 8 mm. LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; RA = right atrium; RV = right ventricle.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Example of PET images attenuation corrected by misaligned CT image with artifacts in anterolateral wall of left ventricle. Artifacts resulted from motion associated with deep breathing of patient during CT scan. Resulting AC map is misaligned with PET emission data. Incorrect AC results in artifactual defects most commonly in anterolateral wall. LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; RA = right atrium; RV = right ventricle.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Application of emission-driven AC. Initial data showed significant mismatch between PET and CT data used for AC in patient without regional perfusion defects. Apparent reduced tracer uptake in anterolateral segments is clearly visible in fused image display and in polar map (top). On basis of assumption that tracer uptake (even if reduced) can be emitted only from cardiac tissue, attenuation map was modified and image reconstruction repeated, resulting in substantial recovery of tracer uptake. Ant = anterior; Inf = inferior; Lat = lateral; Sep = septal.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    (A) Visualization of CT angiography (CTA) and PET data requires integrative display format. Myocardial blood flow under stress conditions with 13N ammonia was calculated using dynamic data. These regional flow values were mapped in color code onto segmented wall from coronary angiography study. In addition, coronary tree was manually extracted and superimposed on 3D polar map of myocardial blood flow. (B) 13N-ammonia and 18F-FDG retention from viability examination were mapped onto myocardial wall. The combination of these 2 tracer studies provides tissue classification, which can be used to describe myocardium specifically. Blue = mismatch or hibernating myocardium; green = normal; LV = left ventricle; RCA = right coronary artery; RV = right ventricle.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Characteristics of Scintillation Crystals for PET

    CharacteristicBGO (Bi4Ge3O12)LSO (Lu2SiO5:Ce)GSO (GdSiO5:Ce)
    Density (g/cm3)7.17.46.7
    Effective Z756559
    Attenuation length at 511 keV (mm)10.411.414.1
    Light yield (photons/MeV)9,00026,00010,000
    Decay time (ns)3004060
    Emission (nm)480420440
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Characteristics and Performance of Commercial PET/CT Systems

    ParameterBiograph 16 (Hi-Rez)Biograph 64Gemini GXLGemini GXL64Discovery ST
    CT
        Slices1664166416
        Rotation speed (s)0.420.330.50.40.5
        Temporal resolution (ms)∼105∼90∼120∼100∼120
        Spatial resolution (line pairs/cm)3030242415.4
    PET
        ScintillatorLSOLSOGSOGSOBGO
        Detector dimensions (mm)4 × 4 × 254 × 4 × 254 × 6 × 304 × 6 × 306.3 × 6.3 × 30
        Axial field of view (cm)16.216.2181815.7
        Sensitivity (cps/kBq)4.54.58.38.39.3 (3D)
        Peak noise equivalent count rate (kcps)9393707063 (3D)
        Transverse resolution (mm)4.54.55.25.26.2 (3D)
        Axial resolution (mm)5.65.65.55.57.0 (3D)
    • Data were obtained from the vendors of the PET/CT systems: Siemens (Biograph 16 and Biograph 64), Philips (Gemini GXL and Gemini GXL64), and GE Healthcare (Discovery ST).

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Effective Radiation Dose for Cardiac PET/CT Studies (61,123,124)

    StudyEffective radiation dose (mSv)
    PET
        18F-FDG (370 MBq)7.0
        13N-NH3 rest/stress (2 × 550 MBq)2.2
        82Rb rest/stress (2 × 740 MBq)5.0
        H215O rest/stress (2 × 740 MBq)1.4
        Transmission 68Ge rod sources0.08–0.13
    Multislice CT
        Calcium scoring1.5–6.2
        CT angiography6.7–13.0
        CT-based PET attenuation correction0.23–5.66
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Diagnostic Performance of PET-Flow Determinations

    StudynSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
    13N-ammonia
        Schelbert (125)4598100
        Tamaki (126)5198100
        Muzik (127)358796
    82Rb
        Go (128)2029378
        Stewart (129)818386
        Grover-McKay (130)3110013
        Marwick (131)7490100
    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Comparison of Diagnostic Information Provided by PET and Multislice CT

    ParameterPETMultislice CT
    Left ventricular function+++++
    Coronary calcification−++
    Coronary angiography−++
    Perfusion++++
    Metabolism+++−
    Viability++++ (?)
    Plaque morphology−+
    Molecular imaging++−
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 46 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 46, Issue 10
October 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PET/CT: Challenge for Nuclear Cardiology
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PET/CT: Challenge for Nuclear Cardiology
Markus Schwaiger, Sibylle Ziegler, Stephan G. Nekolla
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2005, 46 (10) 1664-1678;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PET/CT: Challenge for Nuclear Cardiology
Markus Schwaiger, Sibylle Ziegler, Stephan G. Nekolla
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2005, 46 (10) 1664-1678;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • PET IMAGING
    • COREGISTRATION OF PET AND CT DATA
    • RADIATION EXPOSURE
    • CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • THIS MONTH IN JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Shine-Through in PET/MR Imaging: Effects of the Magnetic Field on Positron Range and Subsequent Image Artifacts
  • Hybrid PET/MR Imaging of the Heart: Potential, Initial Experiences, and Future Prospects
  • Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus CT Coronary Angiography: When to Use Which?
  • Single-Phase CT Aligned to Gated PET for Respiratory Motion Correction in Cardiac PET/CT
  • Decreased Perfusion in the Lateral Wall of the Left Ventricle in PET/CT Studies with 13N-Ammonia: Evaluation in Healthy Adults
  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Gated Rb-82 Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Over Clinical Variables and Rest LVEF
  • Initial Characterization of an 18F-Labeled Myocardial Perfusion Tracer
  • F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging-Assisted Management of Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Suspected Coronary Disease: A Randomized, Controlled Trial (PARR-2)
  • Characterization of Plaques Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Carotid Atherosclerosis and Correlation with Matrix Metalloproteinase-1
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Approaches to Imaging Immune Activation Using PET
  • Large Language Models and Large Multimodal Models in Medical Imaging: A Primer for Physicians
  • Precision Oncology in Melanoma: Changing Practices
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire