Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBasic Science Investigations

Imaging Endogenous Gene Expression in Brain Cancer In Vivo with 111In-Peptide Nucleic Acid Antisense Radiopharmaceuticals and Brain Drug-Targeting Technology

Toyofumi Suzuki, Dafang Wu, Felix Schlachetzki, Jian Yi Li, Ruben J. Boado and William M. Pardridge
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2004, 45 (10) 1766-1775;
Toyofumi Suzuki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dafang Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felix Schlachetzki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian Yi Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruben J. Boado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William M. Pardridge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    (A) An 18-mer PNA that is antisense to nucleotides 20–37 of rat GFAP mRNA (accession number NM_017009). The triplet that is antisense to GFAP methionine initiation codon (AUG) is underlined. The amino terminus has 2 linkers (O) separating PNA base sequence from amino-terminal DTPA group, where O = (CH2-O-CH2-CH2-O-CH2-CH2-O-CH2). The amino terminus was conjugated with DTPA dianhydride while PNA was still attached to the solid-phase resin during synthesis. At the carboxyl terminus of PNA, which is amidated, there are 2 linkers separating the base sequence from a carboxyl-terminal lysine residue, and the ε-amino group of the lysine residue is conjugated with biotin. Upon mixing, there is immediate attachment of biotinylated PNA to SA conjugated to a mAb to the rat TfR. The TfRMAb and the SA are conjugated with a thiol-ether linkage and this conjugate is designated SA-OX26. (B) An 18-mer PNA that is antisense to nucleotides 10–27 of rat CAV mRNA (accession number AF439778). Apart from the base sequence, CAV-PNA has a structure identical to that of GFAP-PNA shown in A, as both are designed for labeling with 111In.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Northern blot produced with cRNA derived by IVT of transcription plasmids encoding either rat GFAP cDNA or rat LAT1 cDNA. Each lane was spotted with 10, 20, or 50 ng of GFAP cRNA or LAT1 cRNA. After electrophoresis with parallel RNA molecular size standards, and blotting, the hybridization was performed with 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26. The film was developed overnight at −20°C. 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26 selectively hybridized to 2.6-kb GFAP mRNA but did not hybridize to LAT1 mRNA.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    (A) Plasma radioactivity, expressed as percentage of injected dose (%ID)/mL plasma at 0.25–60 min after intravenous injection of either unconjugated 111In-GFAP-PNA (○) or 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26 (•) in adult rats. Data are mean ± SE (n = 3 rats per time point). These data were used to generate the pharmacokinetic parameters shown in Table 1. (B) Gel-filtration FPLC using a Superose 12HR10/30 column with elution in PBST. (Top) Elution of serum removed 60 min after intravenous injection of 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26. (Bottom) Elution of uninjected 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26 premixed in control uninjected rat serum. Peak 1, 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26 bound to lipoprotein fraction of serum; peak 2, 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26; peak 3, 111In-GFAP-PNA bound to unconjugated SA; peak 4, free 111In-GFAP-PNA.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26 conjugate or unconjugated 111In-GFAP-PNA (3.7 MBq [100 μCi] per rat) was injected into RG2 brain tumor–bearing rats at 15 d after implantation of 350,000 RG2 cells per brain, and rats were sacrificed at 60 min. The Biomax film was developed for 12 d at −20°C. The film autoradiograms for 4 rats injected with 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26 conjugate are shown in A and the corresponding hematoxylin autopsy stains indicating the size of tumor are shown in B. The film autoradiograms for 4 rats injected with unconjugated 111In-GFAP-PNA are shown in C, and the corresponding hematoxylin autopsy stains are shown in D. The gray-scale autoradiograms from the second images in A and C were colorized, as shown in E and F, respectively.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Confocal microscopy of sections of brain taken from rats implanted with either C6 glioma cells (A–C) or RG2 glioma cells (D–F). (A and D) Section immunostained with rabbit polyclonal antiserum to rat CAV. (B and E) Section immunostained with a mAb to GFAP. (C and F) Overlap image with parallel staining of both GFAP (green) and CAV (red). Bar in A–C is 500 μm; bar in D–F is 200 μm.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Northern blot of tissue mRNA probed with a cDNA to either rat CAV (A) or rat GFAP or actin (B). Lanes 1–3, 4 and 5, and 6–8 are 3 different blots: lanes 1–3, RG2 tumor cells in tissue culture, contralateral rat brain, and RG2 rat brain tumor in vivo, respectively; lanes 4 and 5, contralateral rat brain and C6 rat brain tumor in vivo, respectively; lanes 6–8, C6 glioma cells in tissue culture, freshly isolated rat brain capillaries, and control rat brain, respectively. Films of actin and CAV Northern blots were developed for 3 d. The GFAP Northern autoradiogram for lanes 1–5 was developed overnight and for lanes 6–8 was developed for 10 d; despite this overexposure of the film, the signal representing the GFAP transcript expressed in C6 glioma cells in tissue culture is not detectable (B, lane 6).

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    (A, C, E, and G) Colorized film autoradiograms of sections removed from Fisher CD344 rat brain implanted with RG2 tumors; rats were sacrificed at 6 h after intravenous injection of 111In unconjugated or conjugated PNA. (A) RG2 tumor-bearing rat injected with unconjugated 111In-GFAP-PNA. (C) RG2 tumor-bearing rat injected with 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26. (E) RG2 tumor-bearing rat injected with unconjugated 111In-CAV-PNA. (G) RG2 tumor-bearing rat injected with 111In-CAV-PNA/SA-OX26. (B, D, F, and H) Hematoxylin autopsy stains show size of tumor corresponding to A, C, E, and G, respectively. (I) Integrated density of autoradiogram signal over the brain tumor (tumor) or contralateral brain (brain) for each of 4 different antisense radiopharmaceutical formulations: 1 and 2, 111In-CAV-PNA/SA-OX26 conjugate (CAV-PNA CONJ.); 3 and 4, 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26 conjugate (GFAP-PNA CONJ.); 5 and 6, unconjugated 111In-CAV-PNA (CAV-PNA); 7 and 8, unconjugated 111In-GFAP-PNA (GFAP-PNA). Data are mean ± SE (n = 4 rats in each of 4 groups).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Pharmacokinetic Parameters

    Parameter (units)111In-GFAP-PNA111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26
    A1(%ID/mL)6.3 ± 0.44.0 ± 0.3
    A2(%ID/mL)0.94 ± 0.073.2 ± 0.3
    k1(min−1)0.49 ± 0.040.20 ± 0.04
    k2(min−1)0.017 ± 0.0020.0095 ± 0.0018
    t1/21(min)1.4 ± 0.13.5 ± 0.7
    t1/22(min)40 ± 473 ± 14
    AUC(0–60)(%ID · min/mL)48 ± 1167 ± 3
    AUCSS(%ID · min/mL)67 ± 3360 ± 43
    VSS(mL/kg)243 ± 1789 ± 6
    Cl(mL/min/kg)5.2 ± 0.30.89 ± 0.11
    MRT(min)47 ± 5100 ± 19
    • A1 = first intercept; A2 = second intercept; k1 = first exponential rate constant; k2 = second exponential rate constant; t1/21 = half-time of first exponential decay; t1/22 = half-time of second exponential decay; AUC(0–60) = plasma area under the concentration curve (AUC) for 0–60 min; AUCSS = steady state AUC; VSS = steady state whole-body volume of distribution; Cl = plasma clearance; MRT = plasma mean residence time.

      Parameters were determined from plasma profiles shown in Figure 3A.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Organ Uptake of 111In-GFAP-PNA and 111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26

    OrganUptake (%ID/g)
    111In-GFAP-PNA111In-GFAP-PNA/SA-OX26
    Liver0.11 ± 0.034.5 ± 0.2
    Lung0.38 ± 0.120.73 ± 0.05
    Kidney2.2 ± 0.30.33 ± 0.04
    Heart0.061 ± 0.0130.21 ± 0.03
    Brain0.0061 ± 0.00080.083 ± 0.014
    • Mean ± SE (n = 3 rats per group); determined at 60 min after intravenous injection.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 45 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 45, Issue 10
October 1, 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging Endogenous Gene Expression in Brain Cancer In Vivo with 111In-Peptide Nucleic Acid Antisense Radiopharmaceuticals and Brain Drug-Targeting Technology
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging Endogenous Gene Expression in Brain Cancer In Vivo with 111In-Peptide Nucleic Acid Antisense Radiopharmaceuticals and Brain Drug-Targeting Technology
Toyofumi Suzuki, Dafang Wu, Felix Schlachetzki, Jian Yi Li, Ruben J. Boado, William M. Pardridge
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2004, 45 (10) 1766-1775;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging Endogenous Gene Expression in Brain Cancer In Vivo with 111In-Peptide Nucleic Acid Antisense Radiopharmaceuticals and Brain Drug-Targeting Technology
Toyofumi Suzuki, Dafang Wu, Felix Schlachetzki, Jian Yi Li, Ruben J. Boado, William M. Pardridge
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2004, 45 (10) 1766-1775;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • THIS MONTH IN JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Selective targeting of oncogenic KRAS G12D using peptide nucleic acid oligomers attached to cell-penetrating peptides
  • Systemic antibody-oligonucleotide delivery to the central nervous system ameliorates mouse models of spinal muscular atrophy
  • Preparation and Evaluation of 99mTc-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Peptide Nucleic Acid for Visualization of EGFR Messenger RNA Expression in Malignant Tumors
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire