Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

Perfusion SPECT Changes After Acute and Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Relation to Prestimulus Condition and Long-Term Clinical Efficacy

Koenraad Van Laere, Kristl Vonck, Paul Boon, Jan Versijpt and Rudi Dierckx
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2002, 43 (6) 733-744;
Koenraad Van Laere
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristl Vonck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Boon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Versijpt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rudi Dierckx
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Diagram overview of study design. Maximally, 4 SPECT scans were acquired: 2 at initial VNS onset and 2 during chronic follow-up. Effect of acute stimulation was investigated in initial situation (A) and in chronic situation (B). Chronic changes were evaluated between baseline, prestimulus SPECT scan and chronic situation (C). This pre-VNS study was also compared with studies of age- and sex-matched healthy individuals (D). Below timeline, t, stimulus intensity, I, is schematically shown for different conditions.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Relationship between 99mTc-ECD uptake in right amygdala at initial, acute VNS stimulation and long-term seizure reduction in group of 10 patients for whom long-term perfusion measurements were assessed.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    99mTc-ECD uptake difference caused by acute, initial VNS in thalamus (right [□] and left [▴]) in relation to prestimulus z score and to age- and sex-matched template of 20 healthy volunteers.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Chronic 99mTc-ECD uptake changes in thalamus and mesial temporal cortex (95% confidence interval for mean). Significant decreases are indicated with asterisk. LAM = left amygdala; LHI = left hippocampus; LPH = left gyrus parahippocampus (+ fusiform gyrus); LTH = left thalamus; RAM = right amygdala; RHI = right hippocampus; RPH = right gyrus parahippocampus (+ fusiform gyrus); RTH = right thalamus.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Profiles: Demographic Features and Clinical and Paraclinical Findings

    Patient no.Age at VNS (y)SexHanded-ness (R/L)Disease duration (y)HistoryPreoperative findingsBaseline SPECT vs. reference data
    ClinicalNeuropsychologicalIctal EEGMRI18F-FDG PET
    126.7MR15MeningitisCPSNormalR temp occ recrNormalNormal↓ B prefrontal, ↑ L thal
    247.4MR43Lennox-Gastaut syndromeCPS + SG (atonic)MRElectroDiscrete B atrophyNormal↓ B severe frontal & occ, ↑ R amygdala
    324.6FR24Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, corpus callosotomyCPS ± SGMRR frontal spikesNormalNA↓ Cing post, striatum, ↑ L thal, frontal
    439.5FR27NoneCPSB temp dys (L more)L temp recrB hip & amygdala↓ L hemi↓ L frontal temp par & subcortical
    525.5FR23Lennox-Gastaut syndromeCPS ± SGB memory dysElectro, B frontal rhythmicNormal↓ B frontal temp cerebral & L thal↑ R occ
    69.8MR8Febrile seizuresCPS ± SGNAL & R recrL hip scler, R ant temp atrophy↓ L post frontal↓ R > L temp
    712.4MR5NoneCPS ± SGNAR central recrNormal↓ L hemi↓ L sup temp, ↑ R frontal
    844.5FR23Meningitis, febrile seizuresCPS ± SGR temp occ dysR temp recrR hip sclerNormal↓ L prefrontal & R par, ↑ L amygdala
    936.0MR22Traumatic birthCPSNAR occ recrB occ gliosisNA↑ L thal, pons
    1044.3FR44NoneCPS/SPSAurasL hemi recrL hip SA↓ L temp↑ B thal & L temp
    1140.0MR3Commotio cerebri, encephalitisCPS ± SGNAB recrB small hip↓ global↓ L > R frontal, ↑ L temp
    1238.4FR30Forceps birthCPS ± SGNAL recrNormal↓ L > R frontal↑ L frontal, ↓ B occ
    1341.5FR40Febrile seizuresCPSNormalL and R delta wavesNormal↓ L temp↓ B frontal
    1437.0FR14MeningitisCPS ± SGB mesial temp dysL temp recrB hip sclerosis↓ L ant temp↓ L frontal, ↑ L thal B amygdala
    1530.9FR9Febrile seizuresCPS ± SGR post temp focusR temp recrR mesial temp atrophy↓ R hemiNormal
    1616.3FR11NoneCPS ± SG/SPSB frontal dysR > L ant recrNormal↓ B temp↓ occ, ↑ L frontal
    1731.4MR11Head traumaCPSFrontal temp par dysL frontal temp recrScar tissue R temp neocortical↓ R temp↓ R temp
    1836.5ML30EncephalitisCPSR frontal & midtemp dysMuscle artifactR hip scler, cerebral atrophy↓ L mesial temp & L cerebral↓ R temp
    1947.6MR34Febrile seizuresCPSB frontal dysNormalB frontal schizencephaly, cerebral atrophyNormal↓ frontal hypo, ↑ B temp & L amygdala
    2026.8MR14Premature birth, trauma capitisCPSNormalIndep B temp theta wavesR hip cyst↓ L temp frontal↑ B occ, ↓ L frontal
    2130.9FR17Febrile seizures, ALL with total cranial irradiationCPS ± SGR temp par focus, diffuse dysR post temp par recrB par atrophy↓ R post temp↑ B occ
    2221.4FR15NoneCPSMemory and verbal dysR temp recrLow-grade astr L visual cortex & hip & parahip & amygdala atrophy↓ L frontal tempNormal
    2336.0MR20NoneCPSB mesial temp dysNANormal↓ L lateral temp↓ B frontal
    • EEG = electroencephalography; temp = temporal; occ = occipital; recr = recruitment; B = bilateral; thal = thalamus; MR = mental retardation; elect = electrodecrement; NA = not available; cing = cingulum; post = posterior; dys = dysfunction; hip = hippocampus; hemi = hemisphere; par = parietal; scler = sclerosis; ant = anterior; sup = superior; SPS = simple partial seizures; SA = structure abnormality; hypo = hypoperfusion; indep = independent; ALL = acute lymphocytic leukemia.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    VNS Characteristics and Clinical Efficacy at Time of Chronic Study and at Maximum Follow-Up

    Patient no.Baseline stimulus level at second SPECT (mA)Follow-up (mo)Seizure frequency (CPS/mo)
    Before VNSAt second SPECT% ChangeAt maximum follow-up% Change
    11.50283020−3320−33
    2—730——20−33
    3—22180——60−67
    41.7523154−734−73
    5—1590——3−97
    6—750——500
    7—3012——9−25
    81.7526105−500−100
    91.50153025−1725−17
    10—45——0−100
    11—58——6−25
    12—448——4−50
    13—54——40
    141.502931−671−67
    15—4816——5−69
    16—40200——0−100
    17—44——1−75
    181.25264402−50
    192.00253015−5015−50
    201.50543−253−25
    211.00586−256−25
    22—1210——8−20
    231.2573015−5015−50
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    VOI Comparison for VNS Epilepsy Patients in Acute Phase (Group A) and for Patients Who Underwent Activation in Chronic Situation (Group B)

    AreaVOI size (voxels)AcuteChronic, group B (n = 10)
    Group A (n = 23)Group B (n = 10)
    Ratio (on-to-off)SDt (df = 22)P (2-tailed)Ratio (on-to-off)SDt (df = 9)P (2-tailed)Ratio (on-to-off)SDt (df = 9)P (2-tailed)
    Left parahippocampus* (BA 19, 35, 36)1040.9780.059−1.790.09†0.9920.067−0.39NS0.9980.049−0.12NS
    Left amygdala (BA 34)441.0110.1330.38NS1.0180.1210.47NS1.0080.0730.35NS
    Left hippocampus671.0020.0730.13NS1.0120.0610.62NS1.0310.0681.44NS
    Left thalamus1310.9690.049−2.980.0070.9710.046−1.960.08†1.0440.0304.590.001
    Right parahippocampus* (BA 19, 35, 36)1050.9730.036−3.570.0020.9690.033−2.910.0170.9900.035−0.91NS
    Right amygdala (BA 34)471.0250.1121.07NS1.0380.1330.90NS1.0370.0681.71NS
    Right hippocampus740.9660.059−2.780.0110.9640.057−1.980.08†0.9610.050−2.330.048
    Right thalamus1200.9900.069−0.66NS1.0080.0310.82NS1.0080.0410.64NS
    Brain stem1371.0060.0600.47NS1.0120.0380.91NS1.0120.0560.65NS
    • ↵* Including gyrus parahippocampus and fusiform gyrus.

    • ↵† Two-tailed significance level: P < 0.05; values up to P = 0.10 are displayed; NS = P > 0.10 (not statistically significant).

    • df = degrees of freedom; BA = Brodmann’s area.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Regional Prestimulus, Interictal z Score Versus Healthy Volunteers and Pearson Correlation with Acute Perfusion Changes Caused by VNS

    AreaAcuteChronic, group B (n = 10)
    Group A (n = 23)Group B (n = 10)
    zt (22 df)PzrPrzt (9 df)PzrPrzt (9 df)Pz
    Left parahippocampus (BA 19, 35, 36)0.82.90.008−0.510.010.51.2NS−0.56NS0.82.90.016
    Left amygdala (BA 34)1.12.70.01−0.710.0011.31.3NS−0.46NS1.52.20.06*
    Left hippocampus0.62.70.02−0.510.0130.50.9NS−0.26NS0.51.6NS
    Left thalamus0.93.10.005−0.500.0151.02.50.038−0.820.0060.10.2NS
    Right parahippocampus (BA 19, 35, 36)0.10.7NS−0.26NS0.62.20.06*−0.640.06*0−0.2NS
    Right amygdala (BA 34)0.31.3NS−0.490.020.00.0NS−0.730.02−0.3−0.5NS
    Right hippocampus0.62.90.008−0.24NS0.82.20.06*−0.53NS0.41.1NS
    Right thalamus0.51.4NS−0.510.010.61.5NS−0.720.020.20.5NS
    Brain stem0.20.5NS−0.18NS0.81.5NS−0.620.07*0.71.5NS
    • ↵* Two-tailed significance level: P < 0.05; values up to P = 0.10 are displayed; NS = P > 0.10 (not statistically significant).

    • df = degrees of freedom; Pz = P for Z score; Pr = P for Pearson correlation coefficient; BA = Brodmann’s area.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Chronic Changes Caused by VNS in 10 Patients and Correlation with Follow-Up and with Initial Prestimulus Interictal z Score

    AreaGroup B (n = 10) activity ratio, chronic vs. pre-VNSCorrelations
    Clinical efficacy, second SPECTClinical efficacy, maximum follow-upPrestimulus z score
    Ratio, 3/1SDt (9 df)PrPrPrP
    Left parahippocampus (BA 19, 35, 36)1.0020.0860.06NS−0.24NS−0.01NS−0.30NS
    Left amygdala (BA 34)1.0160.1420.35NS0.11NS0.25NS−0.860.006
    Left hippocampus0.9900.110−0.28NS0.41NS0.28NS−0.840.009
    Left thalamus0.9470.062−2.690.0250.28NS0.01NS−0.23NS
    Right parahippocampus (BA 19, 35, 36)0.9740.066−1.23NS0.38NS0.12NS−0.810.009
    Right amygdala (BA 34)0.9680.159−0.60NS0.660.050.700.04−0.700.05
    Right hippocampus0.9450.096−1.71NS0.580.09*0.850.004−0.760.03
    Right thalamus0.9660.046−2.350.0440.11NS0.53NS0.29NS
    Brain stem0.9940.065−0.29NS0.08NS0.26NS−0.41NS
    • ↵* Two-tailed significance level: P < 0.05; values up to P = 0.10 are displayed; NS = P > 0.10 (not statistically significant).

    • df = degrees of freedom; BA = Brodmann’s area.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 43 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 43, Issue 6
June 1, 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Perfusion SPECT Changes After Acute and Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Relation to Prestimulus Condition and Long-Term Clinical Efficacy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Perfusion SPECT Changes After Acute and Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Relation to Prestimulus Condition and Long-Term Clinical Efficacy
Koenraad Van Laere, Kristl Vonck, Paul Boon, Jan Versijpt, Rudi Dierckx
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2002, 43 (6) 733-744;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Perfusion SPECT Changes After Acute and Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Relation to Prestimulus Condition and Long-Term Clinical Efficacy
Koenraad Van Laere, Kristl Vonck, Paul Boon, Jan Versijpt, Rudi Dierckx
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2002, 43 (6) 733-744;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation and the trigeminal autonomic reflex: An fMRI study
  • Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire