Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

Distribution of Ventilation/Perfusion Ratios in Pulmonary Embolism: An Adjunct to the Interpretation of Ventilation/Perfusion Lung Scans

Emmanuel Itti, Séverine Nguyen, Fabrice Robin, Serge Desarnaud, Jean Rosso, Alain Harf and Michel Meignan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2002, 43 (12) 1596-1602;
Emmanuel Itti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Séverine Nguyen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabrice Robin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge Desarnaud
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean Rosso
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Harf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel Meignan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Examples of V/Q distribution in patient with normal scan (A) and in patient with confirmed PE (B). Histogram shapes characteristically demonstrate single peak in 0.8–1.2 range in patient with normal scan and bimodal distribution in low (<0.8) and high (>1.2) ranges in PE patient.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Correlation between distribution histogram and arterial blood gases in patients with confirmed PE. (A) Inverse relationship exists between percentage of low V/Q ratios and PaO2 (regression equation: y = −1.09x + 112.7). (B) Relationship is positive between percentage of low V/Q ratios and A-aDO2 (regression equation: y = +1.17x − 11.2).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Characteristics

    CharacteristicNo. of patients (n = 99)
    Mean age (y)63 ± 18
    Sex
     Male39
     Female60
    History of cardiopulmonary disease48
     Including obstructive lung disease14
    Referring department
     Cardiology44
     Emergency room/reanimation22
     Internal medicine10
     Surgery8
     Other medical departments15
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Prevalence of PE Within the 4 Revised PIOPED Categories

    CategoryPE present (n = 34)PE absent (n = 65)Prevalence of PE (%)
    High probability (n = 25)17868
    Intermediate probability (n = 45)162936
    Low probability (n = 13)1128
    Normal (n = 16)0160
    • Data are number of patients.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Comparison of Scan Categories with Final Diagnosis of PE

    CategorySensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
    High probability5088
    High or intermediate probability9743
    High, intermediate, or low probability10025
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Distribution Histograms of V/Q Ratios Depending on Scan Normality and Absence or Presence of PE

    % V/QNormal scan (n = 16)PE absent (n = 65)PE present (n = 34)Unpaired t test result (P)
    Comparison 1*Comparison 2†
    <0.412.2 ± 1.313.2 ± 2.314.3 ± 2.80.010.04
    <0.826.9 ± 7.529.9 ± 7.534.5 ± 8.20.0030.008
    0.8–1.263.3 ± 13.059.1 ± 13.850.0 ± 16.00.0060.005
    >1.29.8 ± 5.811.0 ± 7.415.5 ± 10.00.040.01
    >1.60.8 ± 1.41.8 ± 4.54.6 ± 7.00.040.02
    First moment0.87 ± 0.020.87 ± 0.050.89 ± 0.10NSNS
    Second moment0.33 ± 0.040.36 ± 0.080.44 ± 0.180.020.002
    • ↵* Between normal scan and PE present.

    • ↵† Between PE absent and PE present.

    • NS = not statistically significant.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Distribution Histograms of V/Q Ratios Within the 4 PIOPED Categories

    % V/QNormal (n = 16)Low (n = 13)Intermediate (n = 45)High (n = 25)
    <0.412.2 ± 1.3*†13.2 ± 1.213.8 ± 2.7‡14.1 ± 3.0‡
    <0.826.9 ± 7.5†29.1 ± 6.5†30.4 ± 6.1†37.5 ± 9.2*‡§
    0.8–1.263.3 ± 13.0†62.2 ± 12.1†59.8 ± 9.3†41.3 ± 17.4*‡§
    >1.29.8 ± 5.8†8.7 ± 5.9†9.8 ± 4.3†21.3 ± 11.0*‡§
    >1.60.8 ± 1.4†1.0 ± 1.8†0.7 ± 1.1†8.5 ± 8.6*‡§
    First moment0.87 ± 0.02†0.85 ± 0.02†0.85 ± 0.02†0.93 ± 0.12*‡§
    Second moment0.33 ± 0.04†0.34 ± 0.04†0.35 ± 0.03†0.51 ± 0.20*‡§
    • ↵* Significant difference from intermediate-probability group, by ANOVA.

    • ↵† Significant difference from high-probability group, by ANOVA.

    • ↵‡ Significant difference from normal group, by ANOVA.

    • ↵§ Significant difference from low-probability group, by ANOVA.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 43, Issue 12
December 1, 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Distribution of Ventilation/Perfusion Ratios in Pulmonary Embolism: An Adjunct to the Interpretation of Ventilation/Perfusion Lung Scans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Distribution of Ventilation/Perfusion Ratios in Pulmonary Embolism: An Adjunct to the Interpretation of Ventilation/Perfusion Lung Scans
Emmanuel Itti, Séverine Nguyen, Fabrice Robin, Serge Desarnaud, Jean Rosso, Alain Harf, Michel Meignan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2002, 43 (12) 1596-1602;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Distribution of Ventilation/Perfusion Ratios in Pulmonary Embolism: An Adjunct to the Interpretation of Ventilation/Perfusion Lung Scans
Emmanuel Itti, Séverine Nguyen, Fabrice Robin, Serge Desarnaud, Jean Rosso, Alain Harf, Michel Meignan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2002, 43 (12) 1596-1602;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Part I: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Diagnosis
  • Quantification of Regional Ventilation-Perfusion Ratios with PET
  • Tomographic Evaluation for a 3-Dimensional Organ
  • British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire