In the article “Arbutamine Stress Perfusion Imaging in Dogs with Critical Coronary Artery Stenoses: 99mTc-Sestamibi Versus 201Tl,” by Ruiz et al. (J Nucl Med. 2002;43:664–670), the last sentence in the Results section of the abstract was printed incorrectly because of a copyediting error. The correct sentence is “By imaging, defect magnitude (stenotic/normal) was greater for 201Tl than MIBI (0.57 vs. 0.77; P < 0.001).” We regret the error.
The letter “99mTc-Labeled Antimicrobial Peptides for Detection of Bacterial and Candida albicans Infections,” by Das et al. (J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1125), contains an error caused by an author oversight. The last sentence in paragraph 3 of column 2 should read “Larikka et al. (6) showed an increase in specificity from 41% to 95% when a 24-h image was combined with a 1-h image to distinguish an infected hip prosthesis from noninfected inflammation.” The authors regret the error.