Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherCLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Phase I Therapy Study of 186Re-Labeled Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody U36 in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

David R. Colnot, Jasper J. Quak, Jan C. Roos, Arthur van Lingen, Abraham J. Wilhelm, Gerard J. van Kamp, Peter C. Huijgens, Gordon B. Snow and Guus A.M.S. van Dongen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2000, 41 (12) 1999-2010;
David R. Colnot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jasper J. Quak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan C. Roos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arthur van Lingen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abraham J. Wilhelm
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerard J. van Kamp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Huijgens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gordon B. Snow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guus A.M.S. van Dongen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Whole-body scans of patient 4 acquired within 1 h after administration of 186Re-cMAb U36 and after 21, 72, and 144 h and 2 wk. Immediately after injection, most prominent activity is in blood pool. This activity remains high up to 72 h after injection. Relative uptake of radioimmunoconjugate in tumor in right oropharynx increases over time. Tumor becomes better delineated as background activity decreases.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Comparison of planar imaging of head and neck region of patient 1 21 h after administration of 99mTc-cMAb U36 (A) and 186Re-cMAb U36 (B). Accumulation of radiolabeled cMAb U36 is visible at tumor recurrence in right oropharynx.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    CT scan (A) and planar anterior gamma camera scan (B) of patient 7 obtained 144 h after administration of 186Re-cMAb U36 show targeting of lung metastasis in upper lobe of left lung. Accumulation of 186Re-cMAb U36 is also visible on both sides of oropharynx, where recurrent tumor is present.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Relationship between AUC (expressed as %ID × h) determined for 0–25 h after injection for individual patients, both for 99mTc-cMAb U36 (horizontal axis) and for 186Re-cMAb U36 (vertical axis). Although relatively large variations are seen between patients, pharmacokinetic behavior of the 2 conjugates seems similar for individual patients (r = 0.94; P < 0.01).

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Relationship between red marrow dose derived from whole-blood time–activity curve for 186Re-cMAb U36 and percentage decrease from baseline platelet count (r = 0.6; P < 0.05).

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    (A) CT scan of patient 13 shows large tumor originating from esophagus compressing stent that was placed for palliation 12 mo before RIT. (B) CT scan of same patient 3 wk after administration of 2.15 GBq 186Re-labeled cMAb U36. Sixty percent decrease in tumor size was observed as well as relaxation of stent.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Patient and Tumor Characteristics

    Patient no.SexAge (y)Site of diseasePrior treatment
    RadiotherapyChemotherapy
    1M53OropharynxYesMTX
    2F54Posterior pharyngeal wallYesNone
    3M54OropharynxYesNone
    4M47OropharynxNoNone
    5M56Piriform sinus, left and right parapharyngeal areaYesCis + 5-FU
    6M66Larynx and cystic lesion, neck, right sideYesCis + Gem/MTX
    7F56Oropharynx, both sidesYesNone
    8M58HypopharynxYesNone
    9M67Neck recurrence, left sideYesNone
    10M68Oropharynx, right axilla metastasisYesNone
    11M52LarynxYesNone
    12M52Floor of mouth, submental recurrenceYesCis + Gem
    13F59EsophagusYesNone
    • MTX = methotrexate; Cis = cisplatin; 5-FU = fluorouracil; Gem = gemcitabine.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Absorbed Dose Estimates and Myelotoxicity

    Patient no.Dose (GBq/m2)Total administered dose (GBq)Absorbed dose, whole body (cGy/GBq)Absorbed dose, red marrow (cGy)Platelet nadirToxicity gradeWBC nadirToxicity gradeGranulocyte nadirToxicity grade
    10.40.4835.14623003.412.30
    20.40.5924.325*NANANANANANA
    30.40.7032.43020006.105.20
    40.40.7035.12028505.704.10
    51.01.6021.673*NANANANANANA
    61.02.1121.61093733.612.10
    71.01.63NA9120605.304.50
    81.01.7037.8779714.703.70
    91.01.7029.711019007.606.20
    101.01.7829.710012604.903.40
    111.52.9627.010411804.303.20
    121.52.188.11072440.640.14
    131.52.1529.71122242.321.81
    • ↵* Patients 2 and 5 did not complete follow-up for evaluation of hematologic toxicity and are therefore not included for analysis of correlation between red marrow dose and development of hematologic toxicity.

    • WBC = white blood cell count; NA = not available.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Human Anti-cMAb U36 Antibody Response

    Patient no.cMAb U36 dose (mg)Before RISBefore RIT1 wk after RIT6 wk after RIT
    HAMA titerHACA (mg/L)HAMA titerHACA (mg/L)HAMA titerHACA (mg/L)HAMA titerHACA (mg/L)
    12 + 12<50<0.2<501.50*<502.05*<500.33
    22 + 12<50<0.2<501.30*1135.73*NDND
    32 + 52<50<0.2<50<0.252<0.255<0.2
    42 + 52NDND<50<0.2<50<0.2110<0.2
    52 + 52<50<0.2<50<0.2NDNDNDND
    62 + 52<500.7*<501.21*875.29*1332.46*
    72 + 52<50<0.2<50<0.2<50<0.2510*1.76*
    82 + 52<50<0.2<50<0.2<50<0.2<50<0.2
    92 + 52<50<0.267<0.2<50<0.2119<0.2
    102 + 52<50<0.2<50<0.2<50<0.2<50<0.2
    112 + 52<50<0.2<50<0.2<50<0.2147<0.2
    122 + 52<50<0.2<50<0.21361.88*941.32*
    132 + 52<50<0.2<50<0.2<50<0.2<50<0.2
    • ↵* Positive responses.

    • ND = not done.

    • HAMA titers and HACA levels were measured before administration of 2 mg 99mTc-cMAb U36 for RIS and within 1 wk when patients received 12 or 52 mg 186Re-cMAb U36 for RIT. After start of RIT, HAMA and HACA responses were measured at 1 and 6 wk.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Tumor Absorbed Dose Estimates and Response

    Patient no.Total administered dose (GBq)Tumor volume (cm3)Total tumor absorbed dose* (Gy)Tumor absorbed dose (cGy/GBq)ResponseFollow-up (mo)
    10.48342.0424.3Stable lung metastases4
    20.59801.8308.1Progression1
    30.70374.1578.4Progression4
    40.70816.7957.1Progression3
    51.60403.0186.5NANA
    62.11NDNDNDProgression5
    71.6332NDNDStable lung metastases3
    81.70283.5205.4Stable disease for 6 mo8
    91.701418.11064.9Progression4
    101.78744.5248.6Progression3
    112.968016.7262.2Progression6
    122.181358.3383.8Reduction of tumor mass1
    132.1598NDNDReduction of tumor mass2
    • ↵* Ten patients were evaluable for tumor dosimetry. Site of origin of tumors is indicated in Table 1. Only volumes of visualized tumor lesions are included; dosimetry of lung metastases was not possible.

    • NA = not available; ND = not done.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 41, Issue 12
December 1, 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phase I Therapy Study of 186Re-Labeled Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody U36 in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Phase I Therapy Study of 186Re-Labeled Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody U36 in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
David R. Colnot, Jasper J. Quak, Jan C. Roos, Arthur van Lingen, Abraham J. Wilhelm, Gerard J. van Kamp, Peter C. Huijgens, Gordon B. Snow, Guus A.M.S. van Dongen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2000, 41 (12) 1999-2010;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Phase I Therapy Study of 186Re-Labeled Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody U36 in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
David R. Colnot, Jasper J. Quak, Jan C. Roos, Arthur van Lingen, Abraham J. Wilhelm, Gerard J. van Kamp, Peter C. Huijgens, Gordon B. Snow, Guus A.M.S. van Dongen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2000, 41 (12) 1999-2010;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • How Far Have We Come with Solid (Nonhematologic) Tumor Radioimmunotherapy?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Antidrug Antibody Formation in Oncology: Clinical Relevance and Challenges
  • Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Tumor Imaging with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Targeting Antibodies
  • Radiation Dosimetry of 89Zr-Labeled Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody U36 as Used for Immuno-PET in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
  • Immuno-PET: A Navigator in Monoclonal Antibody Development and Applications
  • A Phase I Dose Escalation Study with Anti-CD44v6 Bivatuzumab Mertansine in Patients with Incurable Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck or Esophagus.
  • Radioimmunotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer Xenografts Using 131I-Labeled Antibody L19-SIP for Selective Targeting of Tumor Vasculature
  • Potential of immuno-positron emission tomography for tumor imaging and immunotherapy planning.
  • Performance of immuno-positron emission tomography with zirconium-89-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody u36 in the detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer patients.
  • Radioimmunotherapy with [131I]cG250 in Patients with Metastasized Renal Cell Cancer: Dosimetric Analysis and Immunologic Response
  • Dosimetric Analysis of Radioimmunotherapy with 186Re-Labeled Bivatuzumab in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
  • Phase I Therapy Study with 186Re-labeled Humanized Monoclonal Antibody BIWA 4 (Bivatuzumab) in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • 89Zr Immuno-PET: Comprehensive Procedures for the Production of 89Zr-Labeled Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Reinfusion of Unprocessed, Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor-stimulated Whole Blood Allows Dose Escalation of 186Relabeled Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody U36 Radioimmunotherapy in a Phase I Dose Escalation Study
  • Evaluation of Limited Blood Sampling in a Preceding 99mTc-Labeled Diagnostic Study to Predict the Pharmacokinetics and Myelotoxicity of 186Re-cMAb U36 Radioimmunotherapy
  • How Far Have We Come with Solid (Nonhematologic) Tumor Radioimmunotherapy?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Prognostic Role of 68Ga-PSMA11 PET–Based Response in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Taxane-Based Chemotherapy
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire