Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations (Human)

3-year freedom from progression following 68GaPSMA PET CT triaged management in men with biochemical recurrence post radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multi-center trial.

Louise Emmett, Reuben Tang, Rohan H Nandurkar, George Hruby, Paul J Roach, Jo Anne Watts, Thomas Cusick, Andrew Kneebone, Bao Ho, Lyn Chan, Pim van Leeuwen, Matthijs Scheltema, Andrew Nguyen, Charlotte Yin, Andrew Scott, Colin Tang, Michael McCarthy, Karen Fullard, Matthew Roberts, Roslyn Francis and Phillip Stricker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2019, jnumed.119.235028; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.235028
Louise Emmett
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reuben Tang
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rohan H Nandurkar
2 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Hruby
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul J Roach
4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo Anne Watts
5 Department of Nuclear Medicine/WA PET Services, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Cusick
6 Garvan Institute of Medical Research and & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Kneebone
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bao Ho
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lyn Chan
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pim van Leeuwen
7 Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthijs Scheltema
6 Garvan Institute of Medical Research and & The Kinghorn Cancer Centre;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Nguyen
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotte Yin
4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Scott
8 Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin Tang
9 Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael McCarthy
10 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Fullard
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Roberts
11 Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roslyn Francis
12 Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Western Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phillip Stricker
2 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: 68Ga PSMA PET CT (PSMA) is increasingly used in men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) post radical prostatectomy (RP), but its longer term prognostic / predictive potential in these men is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of PSMA PET for 3 year freedom from progression (FFP) in men with BCR post RP undergoing salvage radiotherapy (sRT). Methods: This prospective multi-center study enrolled 260 men between 2015 and 2017. Eligible patients were referred for PSMA with rising PSA following RP. Management following PSMA was recorded but not mandated. PSMA protocols were standardised across sites and reported prospectively. Clinical, pathological and surgical information, sRT, timing and duration of androgen deprivation (ADT), 3 year PSA results and clinical events were documented. FFP was defined as a PSA rise ≤ 0.2ng/mL above nadir post sRT, with no additional treatment. Results: The median PSA was 0.26ng/mL (IQR 0.15 - 0.59) and follow-up 38 months (IQR 31-43). PSMA was negative in 34.6% (90/260), confined to prostate fossa 21.5% (56/260), pelvic nodes 26.2% (68/260), and distant disease 17.7% (46/260). 71.5% (186/260) received sRT, 38.2% (71/186) to the fossa only, 49.4% (92/186) fossa + pelvic nodes and 12.4% (23/186) nodes alone/SBRT. PSMA was highly predictive of FFP at 3 years following sRT. Overall, FFP was achieved in 64.5% (120/186) of those who received sRT, 81% (81/100) with negative/fossa confined vs. 45% (39/86) for extra fossa disease (p<0.0001). On logistic regression PSMA was more independently predictive of FFP than established clinical predictors, including PSA, T-stage, surgical margin status or Gleason score (P < 0.002). 32% of men with a negative PSMA PET did not receive treatment. Of these, 66% (19/29) progressed, with a mean rise in PSA of 1.59ng/mL over the 3 years. Conclusion: PSMA PET result is highly predictive of FFP at 3 years in men undergoing sRT for BCR following RP. In particular, men with negative PSMA PET or disease identified as still confined to the prostate fossa demonstrate high FFP, despite receiving less extensive radiotherapy and lower rates of additional ADT than those with extra fossa disease.

  • Oncology: GU
  • Peptides
  • PET/CT
  • Radiation Therapy Planning
  • PET CT
  • Prostate specific membrane antigen
  • biochemical failure
  • post radical prostatectomy
  • treatment outcome
  • Copyright © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
3-year freedom from progression following 68GaPSMA PET CT triaged management in men with biochemical recurrence post radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multi-center trial.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
3-year freedom from progression following 68GaPSMA PET CT triaged management in men with biochemical recurrence post radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multi-center trial.
Louise Emmett, Reuben Tang, Rohan H Nandurkar, George Hruby, Paul J Roach, Jo Anne Watts, Thomas Cusick, Andrew Kneebone, Bao Ho, Lyn Chan, Pim van Leeuwen, Matthijs Scheltema, Andrew Nguyen, Charlotte Yin, Andrew Scott, Colin Tang, Michael McCarthy, Karen Fullard, Matthew Roberts, Roslyn Francis, Phillip Stricker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2019, jnumed.119.235028; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.235028

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
3-year freedom from progression following 68GaPSMA PET CT triaged management in men with biochemical recurrence post radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multi-center trial.
Louise Emmett, Reuben Tang, Rohan H Nandurkar, George Hruby, Paul J Roach, Jo Anne Watts, Thomas Cusick, Andrew Kneebone, Bao Ho, Lyn Chan, Pim van Leeuwen, Matthijs Scheltema, Andrew Nguyen, Charlotte Yin, Andrew Scott, Colin Tang, Michael McCarthy, Karen Fullard, Matthew Roberts, Roslyn Francis, Phillip Stricker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2019, jnumed.119.235028; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.235028
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical Factors That Influence Repeat 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Scan Positivity in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer Under Observation After a Negative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Scan: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
  • Utility of 64Cu-Sarcophagine-Bombesin PET/CT in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer and Negative or Equivocal Findings on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT
  • Differences in Failure-Free Survival After Salvage Radiotherapy Guided by Conventional Imaging Versus 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in Postprostatectomy Patients: A Post Hoc Substratification Analysis of the EMPIRE-1 Trial
  • Feasibility of 99mTc-MIP-1404 for SPECT/CT Imaging and Subsequent PSMA-Radioguided Surgery in Early Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Case Series of 9 Patients
  • The PRIMARY Score: Using Intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Patterns to Optimize Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
  • Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: We Have the Answers
  • Changes in Management After 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET in Patients Undergoing Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy, with Early Biochemical Response Outcomes
  • PSMA PET Validates Higher Rates of Metastatic Disease for European Association of Urology Biochemical Recurrence Risk Groups: An International Multicenter Study
  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging
  • Salvage Radiotherapy Management Decisions in Postprostatectomy Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer Based on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Guidance
  • Identification of PCWG3 Target Populations Is More Accurate and Reproducible with PSMA PET Than with Conventional Imaging: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer
  • PSMA-Ligand PET for Early Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Clinical Investigations (Human)

  • The added value of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer
Show more Clinical Investigations (Human)

Clinical (Oncology: GU)

  • Pretherapeutic Comparative Dosimetry of 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • A Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-NaF, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Prospective Cohort of Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • Detection of Additional Primary Neoplasms on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical (Oncology: GU)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Oncology: GU
  • Peptides
  • PET/CT
  • radiation therapy planning
  • PET CT
  • prostate specific membrane antigen
  • biochemical failure
  • post radical prostatectomy
  • treatment outcome
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire