HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yeung, H. W.D. Articles by Larson, S. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yeung, H. W.D. Articles by Larson, S. M.

Patterns of ¹⁸F-FDG Uptake in Adipose Tissue and Muscle: A Potential Source of False-Positives for PET

¹ Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
² Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

The routine use of PET/CT fusion imaging in a large oncology practice has led to the realization that ¹⁸F-FDG uptake into normal fat and muscle can be a common source of potentially misleading false-positive PET imaging in the neck, thorax, and abdomen. The goal of this study was to characterize this normal variant of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in terms of incidence and characteristic extent. Methods: All body scans done on our PET/CT scanners in July and August 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. All cases in which increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the neck was not localized to lymph nodes or other obvious anatomic sites on the CT scans were included in this study. Sites of any unexplained ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the rest of the body were also recorded. Results: A total of 863 PET scans (476 males, 387 females; age, 2–88 y; mean age, 57 y) were reviewed. The following distinctive patterns of nonpathologic ¹⁸F-FDG activity were observed: (a) neck fat, 20 patients (2.3%); (b) paravertebral uptake, 12 patients (1.4%); (c) perinephric fat, 7 patients (0.8%); (d) mediastinal fat, 8 patients (0.9%); (e) normal musculature, 12 patients (1.4%). Patients showing paravertebral uptake, perinephric fat, and mediastinal fat were all associated with the neck fat pattern, singly or in combination. On the other hand, patients showing the normal musculature pattern did not show any of the other uptake. In this analysis, the incidence of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in sites other than the neck is restricted to the patient population with neck fat uptake and may be an underestimation of the true incidence. Neck fat is found predominantly in females, whereas normal musculature is usually seen in males (P < 0.01, Fisher exact test). Neck fat is also seen significantly more in the pediatric population (4/26 = 15%) than in the adult population (16/837 = 1.9%) (P < 0.01, Fisher exact test). Conclusion: Increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake is sometimes seen in individual muscles and in adipose tissue in the neck and shoulder region, axillae, mediastinum, and perinephric regions. There is also associated ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the intercostal spaces in the paravertebral regions. ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in neck fat is more commonly seen in female patients and the pediatric population. The pattern of uptake as well as the age and sex distribution suggest that the ¹⁸F-FDG in fat is in the brown adipose tissue. It is important to recognize this uptake pattern to avoid false interpretation of this benign normal variant as a malignant finding on ¹⁸F-FDG PET scans.

Key Words: ¹⁸F-FDG • uptake • fat • muscle

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. S. Smith, J. Teruya-Feldstein, J. F. Caravelli, and H. W. Yeung False-Positive Findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT: Differentiation of Hibernoma and Malignant Fatty Tumor on the Basis of Fluctuating Standardized Uptake Values Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1091 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. M. Sung, K. S. Lee, B.-T. Kim, S. Kim, O J. Kwon, J. Y. Choi, and S.-O. Yang Nonpalpable Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes in Lung Cancer Patients: Preoperative Characterization with 18F-FDG PET/CT Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 246 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Seam, M. E. Juweid, and B. D. Cheson The role of FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma Blood, November 15, 2007; 110(10): 3507 - 3516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Metser, E. Miller, H. Lerman, and E. Even-Sapir Benign Nonphysiologic Lesions with Increased 18F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT: Characterization and Incidence Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1203 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Nedergaard, T. Bengtsson, and B. Cannon Unexpected evidence for active brown adipose tissue in adult humans Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2007; 293(2): E444 - E452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hadi, C. C. Chen, M. Whatley, K. Pacak, and J. A. Carrasquillo Brown Fat Imaging with 18F-6-Fluorodopamine PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and 123I-MIBG SPECT: A Study of Patients Being Evaluated for Pheochromocytoma J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1077 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Veit-Haibach, G Antoch, T Beyer, H Stergar, R Schleucher, E A M Hauth, and A Bockisch FDG-PET/CT in restaging of patients with recurrent breast cancer: possible impact on staging and therapy Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): 508 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. EVANS, T. A. TULLOSS, and N. HALL 18FDG Uptake in Brown Fat: Potential for False Positives Radiol. Technol., May 1, 2007; 78(5): 361 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Elaini, S. K. Shetty, V. M. Chapman, D. V. Sahani, G. W. Boland, A. T. Sweeney, M. M. Maher, J. T. Slattery, P. R. Mueller, and M. A. Blake Improved Detection and Characterization of Adrenal Disease with PET-CT RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 755 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Blodgett, C. C. Meltzer, and D. W. Townsend PET/CT: Form and Function Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 360 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Blake, A. Singh, B. N. Setty, J. Slattery, M. Kalra, M. M. Maher, D. V. Sahani, A. J. Fischman, and P. R. Mueller Pearls and Pitfalls in Interpretation of Abdominal and Pelvic PET-CT RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1335 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. S. Jhanwar and D. J. Straus The Role of PET in Lymphoma J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1326 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Schoder, D. L. Carlson, D. H. Kraus, H. E. Stambuk, M. Gonen, Y. E. Erdi, H. W.D. Yeung, A. G. Huvos, J. P. Shah, S. M. Larson, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for Detecting Nodal Metastases in Patients with Oral Cancer Staged N0 by Clinical Examination and CT/MRI J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 755 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Jackson, T. C. Schlarman, W. L. Hubble, and M. M. Osman Prevalence and Patterns of Physiologic Muscle Uptake Detected with Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET. J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2006; 34(1): 29 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Love, M. B. Tomas, G. G. Tronco, and C. J. Palestro FDG PET of Infection and Inflammation RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1357 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Truong, J. J. Erasmus, R. F. Munden, E. M. Marom, B. S. Sabloff, G. W. Gladish, D. A. Podoloff, and H. A. Macapinlac Focal FDG Uptake in Mediastinal Brown Fat Mimicking Malignancy: A Potential Pitfall Resolved on PET/CT Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1127 - 1132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Weber Brown Adipose Tissue and Nuclear Medicine Imaging J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1101 - 1103. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Kushner Neuroblastoma: A Disease Requiring a Multitude of Imaging Studies J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1172 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Wahl Why Nearly All PET of Abdominal and Pelvic Cancers Will Be Performed as PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2004; 45(90010): 82S - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]