Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPhysics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences

A physics-guided and learning-based estimation method for segmenting 3D DaT-Scan SPECT images

Hae Sol Moon, Ziping Liu, Maria Ponisio, Richard Laforest and Abhinav Jha
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 10;
Hae Sol Moon
1Biomedical Engineering Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ziping Liu
1Biomedical Engineering Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Ponisio
2Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Laforest
2Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abhinav Jha
1Biomedical Engineering Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis MO United States
2Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

10

Objectives: Quantitative uptakes in the caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus (GP) as measured from dopamine transporter (DaT)-SPECT images are being explored as biomarkers for diagnosis and measuring severity of Parkinson’s disease [1]. Reliable quantification of uptake requires reliable segmentation of these regions, which is challenging due to the low resolution of SPECT images and resultant partial volume effects, high system noise, physiological variability, and small sizes of these regions, in particular the GP [2, 3]. As an example, the GP is visually almost impossible to demarcate from SPECT images (Fig. 1a). However, MR images acquired from previously acquired patient populations can provide prior distributions of the shapes of striatal and pallidial regions. We integrate this knowledge with a physics and estimation-based approach to develop a method for reliable 3D segmentation of DaT SPECT images.

Methods: We designed a Bayesian approach that yields the posterior-mean estimate of the fraction volume that a particular striatal or pallidial region occupies within each voxel of a SPECT image. The estimate is obtained by minimizing a binary cross entropy loss function between the estimated and true fractional volumes over a population of images, where the prior distribution of the true fractional volumes is obtained from existing populations of MR images. The approach was implemented using an auto-encoder architecture. The approach was evaluated using realistic clinically guided simulation studies. Clinical T1-weighted MR images obtained from the OASIS 3 and ADNI databases were delineated using Freesurfer into grey matter, white matter, caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus for both hemispheres and registered in MNI-152 space with voxel size of 1 mm. For each MR image, clinically derived distribution of DaT uptakes [5] was sampled to determine the DaT activity ratios in these regions, resulting in unique 600 DaT activity distribution maps. Through realistic SPECT simulation and 3D OSEM reconstruction, SPECT images corresponding to these distribution maps with voxel sizes of both 2mm or 4mm were created. The network was trained on 500 images and tested on 100 images. The segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the metrics of fuzzy dice similarity coefficient (fDSC), fuzzy Jacard similarity coefficient (fJSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD) of caudate, putamen and globus pallidus for both hemispheres. The robustness of the proposed method to misalignment of SPECT image with the MR population was also evaluated.

Results: The proposed method significantly outperforms existing segmentation methods for both the left and right caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus regions for both voxel sizes (Fig. 1b). For e.g., the method yielded an fDSC of 0.863 (95% CI: 0.857, 0.869) for left putamen with 4 mm voxel size. Qualitatively, the boundaries yielded by the proposed method matched the ground-truth boundaries (Fig. 1a). The method was relatively insensitive to up to ± 4 degree misalignment between SPECT image and MR populations for both 2 mm and 4 mm voxel size (Fig. 1c).

Conclusions: A MR-guided fully automated segmentation method significantly outperformed other existing segmentation of caudate, putamen and globus pallidus for DaT SPECT images as evaluated using computational studies. The results motivate further validation of these methods using physical-phantom data and clinical studies.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A physics-guided and learning-based estimation method for segmenting 3D DaT-Scan SPECT images
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
A physics-guided and learning-based estimation method for segmenting 3D DaT-Scan SPECT images
Hae Sol Moon, Ziping Liu, Maria Ponisio, Richard Laforest, Abhinav Jha
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 10;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A physics-guided and learning-based estimation method for segmenting 3D DaT-Scan SPECT images
Hae Sol Moon, Ziping Liu, Maria Ponisio, Richard Laforest, Abhinav Jha
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 10;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences

  • Clinical feasibility of quantitative holmium-166 SPECT in presence of technetium-99m colloid
  • 3D Structural Convolutional Sparse Coding for PET Image Reconstruction
  • Exploration of Multi-objective Optimization with Genetic Algorithms for PET Image Reconstruction
Show more Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences

Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences Countil YIA Symposium

  • NEMA Performance Evaluation of Long Axial Field-of-View Brain PET Insert with 7T MRI Compatibility
  • Anatomy-guided PET image reconstruction with deep neural network
  • Aortic valve imaging using 18F-Sodium Fluoride: Implications of triple motion correction on test-retest reproducibility
Show more Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences Countil YIA Symposium

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire