Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Prognostic Significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Distal Bile Duct Cancer undergoing Curative Surgery

Hyunkyung Yi, Joohee Lee, Seung Hyup Hyun, Seung Hwan Moon, Young Seok Cho, Yearn Choe, Kyung-Han Lee, Byung-Tae Kim and Joon Young Choi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 500;
Hyunkyung Yi
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joohee Lee
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seung Hyup Hyun
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seung Hwan Moon
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Young Seok Cho
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yearn Choe
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyung-Han Lee
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Byung-Tae Kim
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joon Young Choi
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

500

Objectives: As there were few previous studies with a small number of subjects (Anticancer Res 2015;6985-6992), we evaluated the prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with distal bile duct cancer undergoing curative surgery.

Methods: Subjects were 43 consecutive patients (M:F = 27:16; age, 28.1 ± 7.8 years) who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT followed by curative surgical resection. As clinicopathological variables for predicting overall survival, age, sex, baseline serum CA19-9 level, pathological tumor size, pathological stage, pathological tumor grade, R0 resection, and adjuvant therapy were included. As PET/CT variables, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), average SUV (SUVavg), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor were measured with the liver activity (2 cm3 rectangular volume of interest, SUVavg + 2 sd) as a cutoff for the tumor segmentation. The Kaplan-Meyer method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for the survival analysis.

Results: During following up, death occurred in the 11 of 43 patients (25.6%). In univariate analysis, low SUVmax (≤ 2.9, p = 0.008), low SUVavg (≤ 2.4, p = 0.036), and elevated serum CA19-9 level (>25 U/ml, p = 0.027) were significant predictors for poor overall survival. In multivariate analyses, both low SUVmax (HR = 0.251, 95% C.I. 0.071-0.886, p = 0.032) and elevated serum CA19-9 level (HR = 6.314, 95% C.I. 0.801-49.785, p = 0.080) were independent prognostic factors associated with poor overall survival.

Conclusion: The SUVmax of primary tumor measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT is an independent significant prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with distal bile duct cancer along with serum CA19-9 level. However, different results from a previous study warrant further large-sized study. Research Support: None.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Distal Bile Duct Cancer undergoing Curative Surgery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Distal Bile Duct Cancer undergoing Curative Surgery
Hyunkyung Yi, Joohee Lee, Seung Hyup Hyun, Seung Hwan Moon, Young Seok Cho, Yearn Choe, Kyung-Han Lee, Byung-Tae Kim, Joon Young Choi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 500;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prognostic Significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Distal Bile Duct Cancer undergoing Curative Surgery
Hyunkyung Yi, Joohee Lee, Seung Hyup Hyun, Seung Hwan Moon, Young Seok Cho, Yearn Choe, Kyung-Han Lee, Byung-Tae Kim, Joon Young Choi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 500;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of Gastrin-Releasing-Peptide receptor (GRPr) and Prostate-Specific- Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in primary prostate cancer: comparison with radiolabeled GRPr antagonist (68Ga-RM2) PET/CT
  • Relationship between FDG PETCT imaging and CA 125 levels in treated patients with Ovarian cancers - Can FDG PETCT define and predict the disease burden in clinically suspected recurrence ?
  • Proton Range Verification with PET Imaging in Brain and Head and Neck Cancers
Show more Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

GI-Non-colorectal

  • Can FDG PET/CECT accurately restage patients of stomach carcinoma?
  • Evaluation of CXCR4 expression of pancreatic cancer with 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MRI - initial experience
  • FDG PET-derived parameters as biomarkers response in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma patients
Show more GI-Non-colorectal

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire