Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & Management

Abnormality manipulation of PET images

Mark Madsen, Kevin Berbaum, Robert Caldwell and Kevin Schartz
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 357;
Mark Madsen
1Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Berbaum
1Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Caldwell
1Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Schartz
1Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

357

Objectives Image perception studies using clinical PET images can be challenging because of the difficulty in compiling control and target cases. We have developed and tested software that allows the removal and insertion of abnormalities so that perception case sets can be rapidly constructed.

Methods The methods for manipulating PET images have been developed from similar approaches used on CT data. A review module allows the logging and capture of abnormalities to a library for insertion into selected regions of other PET studies. Abnormal areas are removed by locating elliptical masks over the abnormality and an appropriate replacement region in the surrounding tissue. Alternative forced choice experiments were performed with 7 experienced PET physicians to evaluate the performance of the software. 27 cases of 5 axial slices had abnormalities removed and were displayed with 3 unaltered data sets. The task required the observer to select the altered images from among the 4 displays. Each case was used twice with order scrambling for a total of 54 cases.

Results The mapping software is complete and allows the easy review and logging of PET CT data. For the PET abnormality removal experiment, observers on average correctly called the altered cases in only 19.4 out of 54 (chance: 13.5) and correctly called repeats in only 4.7 out of 27 cases (chance: 1.7). Further, the consensus observer (4 or more observers with the same selection) was consistent with chance selection being correct only 13 times for all cases and correct for only 1 of the repeats.

Conclusions The set of tools developed for reviewing and manipulating PET images are useful for creating case sets for PET image perception studies using real clinical images. The removal software has been successfully tested with human observers and observer experiments with inserted abnormalities will be completed in the near future.

Research Support This work is supported by the NIBIB (5R01EB006638-03)

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Abnormality manipulation of PET images
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Abnormality manipulation of PET images
Mark Madsen, Kevin Berbaum, Robert Caldwell, Kevin Schartz
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 357;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Abnormality manipulation of PET images
Mark Madsen, Kevin Berbaum, Robert Caldwell, Kevin Schartz
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 357;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & Management

  • Usefulness of dynamic FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of liver tumor
  • Variations in SUV values with reconstruction algorithms
  • Evaluation of ten automatic thresholding methods for segmentation of PET images
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & Management

Data Analysis & Management: Oncology - Quantitative Methods & Applications

  • Dynamic FDG PET imaging using direct 4D parametric reconstruction in cancer patients
  • Automatic analysis of molecular PET/CT images using cognition network technology: A novel concept
Show more Data Analysis & Management: Oncology - Quantitative Methods & Applications

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire