Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Evaluation of Surgical Margins with Intraoperative PSMA PET/CT and Their Prognostic Value in Radical Prostatectomy

Alexandros Moraitis, Theresa Kahl, Jens Kandziora, Walter Jentzen, David Kersting, Lukas Püllen, Henning Reis, Jens Köllermann, Claudia Kesch, Ulrich Krafft, Boris A. Hadaschik, Habib Zaidi, Ken Herrmann, Francesco Barbato, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Christopher Darr and Pedro Fragoso Costa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2025, 66 (3) 352-358; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268719
Alexandros Moraitis
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa Kahl
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
3Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Kandziora
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter Jentzen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Kersting
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lukas Püllen
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
3Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henning Reis
4Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Köllermann
4Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia Kesch
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
3Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Krafft
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
3Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris A. Hadaschik
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
3Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Habib Zaidi
5Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Barbato
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang P. Fendler
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Darr
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
3Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pedro Fragoso Costa
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Detection of positive resection margins in surgical procedures of high-risk prostate cancer is key for minimizing the risk of recurrence. This study aimed at evaluating the accuracy of functional tumor-volume segmentation in intraoperative ex vivo PET/CT for margin assessment in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Methods: Seven high-risk prostate cancer patients received [18F]PSMA-1007 before radical prostatectomy. After removal of the prostate gland, ex vivo imaging on the AURA 10 PET/CT system was performed, and functional tumor volume was segmented using 4 semiautomatic segmentation methods. Resection margins and volumes were compared with histopathology. Additionally, a supportive phantom study was conducted to assess segmentation accuracy at low radiopharmaceutical activity. Results: Clinically, 18 lesions were analyzed in intraoperative PET/CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of margin detection were 83%, 100%, 100%, and 92%, respectively, using an iterative thresholding method. In 1 patient, a biochemical recurrence was observed within 1 y of prostate-specific antigen follow-up, and 1 patient underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. The remaining 5 patients were still undergoing prostate-specific antigen follow-up with no evidence of biochemical recurrence. On the basis of a phantom-deduced minimal segmentable activity concentration of approximately 2 kBq/mL, we propose an administered [18F]PSMA-1007 activity of at least 1.9 and 0.4 MBq/kg for preoperative and intraoperative injections, respectively. Conclusion: Intraoperative ex vivo PET/CT is a promising modality for intraoperative margin assessment. Prospective trials are needed to further investigate the value of specimen PET/CT-based radioguided surgery in high-risk prostate cancer.

  • margin assessment
  • PET/CT
  • prostate cancer
  • radical prostatectomy
  • radioguided surgery

Footnotes

  • Published online Feb. 6, 2025.

  • © 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 3
March 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Surgical Margins with Intraoperative PSMA PET/CT and Their Prognostic Value in Radical Prostatectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Surgical Margins with Intraoperative PSMA PET/CT and Their Prognostic Value in Radical Prostatectomy
Alexandros Moraitis, Theresa Kahl, Jens Kandziora, Walter Jentzen, David Kersting, Lukas Püllen, Henning Reis, Jens Köllermann, Claudia Kesch, Ulrich Krafft, Boris A. Hadaschik, Habib Zaidi, Ken Herrmann, Francesco Barbato, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Christopher Darr, Pedro Fragoso Costa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2025, 66 (3) 352-358; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268719

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of Surgical Margins with Intraoperative PSMA PET/CT and Their Prognostic Value in Radical Prostatectomy
Alexandros Moraitis, Theresa Kahl, Jens Kandziora, Walter Jentzen, David Kersting, Lukas Püllen, Henning Reis, Jens Köllermann, Claudia Kesch, Ulrich Krafft, Boris A. Hadaschik, Habib Zaidi, Ken Herrmann, Francesco Barbato, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Christopher Darr, Pedro Fragoso Costa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2025, 66 (3) 352-358; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268719
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Meeting Upcoming Clinical and Diagnostic Needs in Oncologic Imaging: A Structured Reporting System for Fibroblast-Activation-Protein–Targeted Imaging—FAP-RADS Version 1.0
  • Imaging Efficacy of [18F]CTT1057 PET for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Tumors Using Histopathology as Standard of Truth: Results from the GuideView Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study
  • Cost-Effectiveness of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis Based on Results of the NETTER-2 Trials
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • margin assessment
  • PET/CT
  • prostate cancer
  • radical prostatectomy
  • radioguided surgery
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire