Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Robert J.H. Miller, Paul Kavanagh, Mark Lemley, Joanna X. Liang, Tali Sharir, Andrew J. Einstein, Mathews B. Fish, Terrence D. Ruddy, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Albert J. Sinusas, Edward J. Miller, Timothy M. Bateman, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo Di Carli, Sean Hayes, John Friedman, Daniel S. Berman, Damini Dey and Piotr J. Slomka
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2025, jnumed.124.268079; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268079
Robert J.H. Miller
1Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
2Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Kavanagh
1Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Lemley
1Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanna X. Liang
1Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tali Sharir
3Department of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel, and Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Einstein
4Division of Cardiology, Departments of Medicine, and Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mathews B. Fish
5Oregon Heart and Vascular Institute, Sacred Heart Medical Center, Springfield, Oregon;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terrence D. Ruddy
6Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp A. Kaufmann
7Cardiac Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert J. Sinusas
8Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward J. Miller
8Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy M. Bateman
9Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies LLC, Kansas City, Missouri; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharmila Dorbala
10Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcelo Di Carli
10Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Hayes
1Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Friedman
1Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel S. Berman
1Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damini Dey
1Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piotr J. Slomka
1Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that a deep learning (DL) model of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging improved accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to improve the clinical translatability of this artificial intelligence (AI) approach using the results to derive enhanced total perfusion deficit (TPD) and 17-segment summed scores. Methods: We used a cohort of patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging within 180 d of invasive coronary angiography. Obstructive CAD was defined as any stenosis of at least 70% or at least 50% in the left main coronary artery. We used per-vessel DL predictions to modulate polar map pixel scores. These transformed polar maps were then used to derive TPD-DL and summed stress score–DL. We compared diagnostic performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: In the 555 patients held out for testing, the median age was 65 y (interquartile range, 57–73 y), and 381 (69%) were male. Obstructive CAD was present in 329 (59%) patients. The prediction performance for obstructive CAD of stress TPD-DL (AUC, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.804–0.870) was higher than AI prediction alone (AUC, 0.795; 95% CI, 0.758–0.831; P = 0.005) and traditional stress TPD (AUC, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.696–0.778; P < 0.001). Summed stress score–DL had the second highest prediction performance (AUC, 0.822; 95% CI, 0.788–0.857) and higher AUC than traditional quantitative summed stress score (AUC, 0.728; 95% CI, 0.686–0.769; P < 0.001). At a threshold of 5%, the sensitivity and specificity of TPD rose from 72% to 79% and from 62% to 70%, respectively. Conclusion: Integrating AI predictions with traditional quantitative approaches leads to a simplified AI approach, presenting clinicians with familiar measures but operating with higher accuracy than traditional quantitative scoring. This approach may facilitate integration of new AI methods into clinical practice.

  • deep learning
  • myocardial perfusion imaging
  • quantification
  • artificial intelligence
  • diagnostic accuracy

Footnotes

  • Published online Feb. 20, 2025.

  • © 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 6
June 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Robert J.H. Miller, Paul Kavanagh, Mark Lemley, Joanna X. Liang, Tali Sharir, Andrew J. Einstein, Mathews B. Fish, Terrence D. Ruddy, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Albert J. Sinusas, Edward J. Miller, Timothy M. Bateman, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo Di Carli, Sean Hayes, John Friedman, Daniel S. Berman, Damini Dey, Piotr J. Slomka
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2025, jnumed.124.268079; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268079

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Robert J.H. Miller, Paul Kavanagh, Mark Lemley, Joanna X. Liang, Tali Sharir, Andrew J. Einstein, Mathews B. Fish, Terrence D. Ruddy, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Albert J. Sinusas, Edward J. Miller, Timothy M. Bateman, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo Di Carli, Sean Hayes, John Friedman, Daniel S. Berman, Damini Dey, Piotr J. Slomka
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2025, jnumed.124.268079; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268079
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • [18F]FDG PET/CT Predicts Patient Survival in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
  • Whole-Body [18F]DPA-714 Kinetic Assessment Using PET/CT Scanner with Long Axial Field of View
  • Clinical Outcomes of 177Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Skeletal Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors: Insights from Real-World Experience
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • deep learning
  • myocardial perfusion imaging
  • quantification
  • artificial intelligence
  • diagnostic accuracy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire