Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOral - PhysicianPharm

Ga-68-FAPI for sarcoma imaging: Data from the FAPI-PET prospective observational trial

Lukas Kessler, Rainer Hamacher, Justin Ferdinandus, Fadi Zarrad, Nader Hirmas, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Jens Siveke, Ken Herrmann and Wolfgang Fendler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 126;
Lukas Kessler
1Nuclear medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rainer Hamacher
2Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin Ferdinandus
1Nuclear medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fadi Zarrad
1Nuclear medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nader Hirmas
1Nuclear medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus
3Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Siveke
5Institute for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
4Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK, partner site Essen) and German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
1Nuclear medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Fendler
1Nuclear medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

126

Introduction: Bone and soft tissue tumors are of mesenchymal origin and have been shown to express fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in tumor cells and cancer-associated fibroblast. Recently introduced radio-labelled FAP-Inhibitors (e.g. 68Ga-FAPI46) have shown increased tumor uptake in positron emission tomography in sarcoma patients. Here we report the accuracy of FAPI-PET in a prospective trial.

Methods: Fortyseven patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma undergoing clinical 68Ga-FAPI-PET were enrolled into the FAPI-PET observational trial. Of these, 46 (92%) patients also underwent 18F-Fluordesoxyglucose-PET. Primary Endpoint was association of 68Ga-FAPI-PET uptake intensity and histopathological FAP-expression. Secondary endpoints were detection rate, positive predictive value (PPV), detection rate, interrater reproducibility, and change in management.

Results: Primary endpoint was met and the association between FAPI-PET uptake intensity and histopathological FAP-expression was significant (p = 0.037). Lesions were validated by histopathology and if possible FAP-immunohistochemistry in 31 patients. Sensitivity and specificity for histopathologically confirmed lesions were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.82-1.0) and 0.50 (95% CI; 0.01-0.99). PPV was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.82-1.0) for any tumor and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.54-0.89) for histopathology-FAP-positive tumors on a per-patient basis. 327 lesions were detected by FAPI-PET/CT compared to 359 lesions by FDG-PET/CT. Clinical management changed in 19 (41.3%) patients after FAPI-PET/CT. In 7 (14%) patients FAPI-PET/CT resulted in an upstaging compared to FDG-PET/CT, in two patients (8%) it resulted in a downstaging. Readers showed substantial to almost perfect agreement for the defined regions (local Fleiss’ κ = 0.73;; distant nodalκ = 0.92; lung κ = 0.86; bone κ = 0.65 and other organs/tissues κ = 0.63) and fair agreement for local nodal staging κ = 0.33. Conclusion: We confirm an association of FAPI-PET uptake intensity and histopathological FAP expression in sarcoma patients. Additionally, we demonstrate high PPV and sensitivity for 68Ga-FAPI-PET by blinded reads and histopathological validation.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ga-68-FAPI for sarcoma imaging: Data from the FAPI-PET prospective observational trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Ga-68-FAPI for sarcoma imaging: Data from the FAPI-PET prospective observational trial
Lukas Kessler, Rainer Hamacher, Justin Ferdinandus, Fadi Zarrad, Nader Hirmas, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Jens Siveke, Ken Herrmann, Wolfgang Fendler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 126;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Ga-68-FAPI for sarcoma imaging: Data from the FAPI-PET prospective observational trial
Lukas Kessler, Rainer Hamacher, Justin Ferdinandus, Fadi Zarrad, Nader Hirmas, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Jens Siveke, Ken Herrmann, Wolfgang Fendler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 126;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oral - PhysicianPharm

  • Safety and efficacy of radioligand therapy with 177lutetium-PSMA-617 within 3 months after 223Radium-dichloride
  • Usefulness of99mTc SESTAMIBI Scintigraphy in Persistent Hyperparathyroidism after Kidney Transplant
  • Toll-like receptor 5 in triple-negative breast cancer: a novel reporter for tumor progression
Show more Oral - PhysicianPharm

Advances in PET Imaging for Cancer: Highlights of Clinical Diagnostics in Oncology

  • Multi-Parametric Total-body Dynamic PET/CT imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Lymph Nodes
  • 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in the evaluation of post-treatment response for Waldenström Macroglobulinemia/ Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
  • Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG uptake in gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers
Show more Advances in PET Imaging for Cancer: Highlights of Clinical Diagnostics in Oncology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire