Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPoster - PhysicianPharm

Comparison of S-Values and Absorbed Dose Rates at the Cellular Level in Prostate Cancer Cells Irradiated with 177Lu and 225Ac Labelled Compounds

Cassandra Miller, Guillaume Chausse, Julia Brosch-Lenz, Francois Benard, Arman Rahmim and Carlos Uribe
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1574;
Cassandra Miller
2Physics and Astronomy University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
1Department of Integrative Oncology BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillaume Chausse
3Department of Molecular Oncology BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
5Functional Imaging BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
4Department of Radiology BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Brosch-Lenz
6Department of Nuclear Medicine LMU University Hospital Munich Munich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francois Benard
5Functional Imaging BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
4Department of Radiology BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
3Department of Molecular Oncology BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arman Rahmim
2Physics and Astronomy University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
1Department of Integrative Oncology BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
5Functional Imaging BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
4Department of Radiology BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Uribe
4Department of Radiology BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
5Functional Imaging BC Cancer Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1574

Introduction: Radiopharmaceutical therapies with 177Lu and 225Ac labelled pharmaceuticals are increasing in popularity and have shown success in the treatment of malignancies such as prostate and neuroendocrine cancers. However, the dose deposition of 177Lu and 225Ac are different at the cellular level due to the differing properties between beta and alpha emissions, such as the particle range, the number of particle interactions, and the energy deposition in their tracks. Internalization properties of the pharmaceutical, i.e. whether the pharmaceutical crosses the membrane into the cytoplasm, may also impact the therapeutic efficacy. This work aims to compare S-values and relative absorbed dose rates to the nucleus, nuclear membrane, cytoplasm, and membrane of a LNCaP prostate cancer cell irradiated with either 177Lu or 225Ac. While this work focuses on the macroscopic quantities such as absorbed dose, our long term goal is to incorporate microdosimetry and evaluate the energy deposition on a microscopic level.

Methods: A spherical LNCaP prostate cancer cell was modelled using GATE version 9.0. The cell model includes the nucleus, nuclear membrane, cytoplasm, and membrane which were all water density. The radii of the nucleus and the cytoplasm were based off of the corresponding areas of human LNCaP cells and were 4.48 um and 6.74 um respectively, while each membrane was 5 nm thick. For simulations, the cell was suspended in water and the cytoplasm or membrane was filled with a homogeneous activity distribution of 177Lu or 225Ac. Simulations were performed separately for the cytoplasm and membrane. 3D matrices (0.18x0.18x0.18 um) were created containing information about the absorbed dose deposited in each voxel. Separate scoring matrices were created for each cell region and were used to calculate S-values. To determine the relative dose rates of a PSMA targeting compound labelled with 177Lu and 225Ac, the ratio of uptake in the cytoplasm and membrane was assessed using a standardized internalization assay in which LNCaP cells were incubated with a 177Lu labelled PSMA targeting ligand. The activity in each cell region was determined at multiple time points by cleaving the cellular surface proteins using an acid wash and subsequently measuring the activity per region using a gamma counter. The calculated S-values were combined with the cytoplasm to membrane ratio at the 120 minute time point to estimate the relative absorbed dose rates to the cell regions between 177Lu and 225Ac.

Results: The calculated S-values are summarized in Table 1. The S-values from the cytoplasm and membrane to the nucleus were 3.03x10-4 Gy/Bqs and 1.91x10-4 Gy/Bqs from 177Lu, and 3.92x10-2 Gy/Bqs and 2.29x10-2 Gy/Bqs from 225Ac, respectively. This corresponds to a 160% and 170% higher dose rate to the nucleus from 177Lu and 225Ac respectively when the radiopharmaceutical is internalized into the cell compared to being present only in the membrane. At 120 minutes, the ratio of activity in the membrane to the cytoplasm was 1:2.32. At this time, the relative absorbed dose rates to the nucleus, nuclear membrane, cytoplasm, and cell membrane were 127.3, 121.1, 119.0, and 116.0 times higher with 225Ac than 177Lu respectively.

Conclusions: Our model suggests that for a given radioactivity, 225Ac therapy is 100 times more effective at delivering radiation energy to cancer cells compared to 177Lu. Futhermore, radiopharmaceuticals which are internalized into the cell may be significantly more effective at cell kill. The next step is to expand our model into the realm of microdosimetry by incorporating lineal energy and specific energy at the cellular or regional levels. We also aim to find correlations between this work and the cell’s biological response to therapy, such as the number of double stranded DNA breaks after incubation with radiolabelled compounds.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 1: The S-values (Gy/Bqs) for 177Lu and 225Ac from the source (column) to the target (row)

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of S-Values and Absorbed Dose Rates at the Cellular Level in Prostate Cancer Cells Irradiated with 177Lu and 225Ac Labelled Compounds
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of S-Values and Absorbed Dose Rates at the Cellular Level in Prostate Cancer Cells Irradiated with 177Lu and 225Ac Labelled Compounds
Cassandra Miller, Guillaume Chausse, Julia Brosch-Lenz, Francois Benard, Arman Rahmim, Carlos Uribe
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1574;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of S-Values and Absorbed Dose Rates at the Cellular Level in Prostate Cancer Cells Irradiated with 177Lu and 225Ac Labelled Compounds
Cassandra Miller, Guillaume Chausse, Julia Brosch-Lenz, Francois Benard, Arman Rahmim, Carlos Uribe
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1574;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Poster - PhysicianPharm

  • Preliminary result of Texture Analysis on prediction of overall outcome of neuroendocrine tumors based on pre-therapy heterogeneity of somatostatin receptors on 68Ga Dotatate PET/CT scans.
  • Association of myocardial uptake on early FDG PET with cardiac radiation dose and cardiotoxicity after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer
  • A head-to-head comparison of the Lugano Classification and PERCIST for FDG-PET/CT response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Show more Poster - PhysicianPharm

Dosimetry

  • Preliminary Human Dosimetry Studies of [11C]-CS1P1, a Novel PET Tracer for Targeting Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 1 (S1P1)
  • Biodi: an application for storage, comparison, and dosimetry of biodistribution experiments in radiopharmaceutical development
  • Generation of clinical 177Lu SPECT/CT images for dosimetry in Molecular Radiotherapy based on Monte Carlo simulation with GATE
Show more Dosimetry

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire