Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential application of small-molecular-weight 64Cu-labeled bis-DOTA-hypericin in the noninvasive assessment of response to photothermal ablation therapy. Methods: Bis-DOTA-hypericin was labeled with 64Cu with high efficiency (>95% without purification). Nine mice bearing subcutaneous human mammary BT474 tumors were used. Five mice were injected intratumorally with semiconductor CuS nanoparticles, followed by near-infrared laser irradiation 24 h later (12 W/cm2 for 3 min), and 4 mice were not treated (control group). All mice were intravenously injected with 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin (24 h after laser treatment in treated mice). Small-animal PET images were acquired at 2, 6, and 24 h after radiotracer injection. All mice were killed immediately after the imaging session for biodistribution and histology study. In vitro cell uptake and surface plasmon resonance studies were performed to validate the small-animal PET results. Results: 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin uptake was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group. The percentage injected dose per gram of tissue in the treated and control groups was 1.72 ± 0.43 and 0.76 ± 0.19, respectively (P = 0.017), at 24 h after injection. Autoradiography and histology results were consistent with selective uptake of the radiotracer in the necrotic zone of the tumor induced by photothermal ablation therapy. In vitro results showed that treated BT474 cells had a higher uptake of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin than nontreated cells. Surface plasmon resonance study showed that bis-DOTA-hypericin had higher binding affinity to phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine than to phosphatidylcholine. Conclusion: 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin has a potential to image thermal therapy–induced tumor cell damage. The affinity of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin for injured tissues may be attributed to the breakdown of the cell membrane and exposure of phosphatidylserine or phosphatidylethanolamine to the radiotracer, which binds selectively to these phospholipids.
- hypericin
- neoplasm
- cell damage
- near-infrared (NIR)
- photothermal ablation therapy
- positron emission tomography
The fundamental problem of cancer treatment is the recurrence of resistant phenotypes. Most cancers, over time, develop resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and subsequently give rise to metastatic tumors that inevitably are fatal. In addition to the obvious need to develop more efficient and cancer cell–specific drugs, the development of new treatment modalities that can potentially overcome resistance through a mechanism completely different from that of traditional therapies is highly desirable.
Phototherapy is the use of electromagnetic radiation to treat various medical conditions, including cancer (1). This new type of cancer therapy is gaining popularity because it delivers a specific amount of energy directly into the tumor mass through the use of skin-penetrating near-infrared (NIR) (wavelength, 700–1,065 nm) irradiation. This laser energy delivered to the targeted tumors can induce localized photochemical, photomechanical, and photothermal reactions that kill the tumor cells (2). In photothermal ablation (PTA), heat generated through the absorption of light is used to directly destroy cancer cells (3).
PTA is attractive because it is a locoregional physical treatment and, therefore, should have fewer side effects than conventional cancer treatments. PTA may also be performed repeatedly without the accumulation of toxic side effects and resistance. The efficiency of PTA can be significantly enhanced when a light-absorbing material is applied to the target tissue to mediate selective photothermal effects (4). Various gold nanostructures, including nanoshells, nanorods, and nanocages, which absorb NIR light, have been shown to be effective photothermal coupling agents (5–8). Recently, a new class of semiconductor nanostructure CuS nanoparticles suitable for PTA was introduced (9,10). These nanoparticles were simple to make, possessed excellent stability, and were much smaller than gold nanostructures. Furthermore, CuS nanoparticles displayed strong absorption in the NIR region (peak, 900–930 nm) and mediated the ablation of tumor cells on exposure to NIR light both in vitro and in vivo after either intratumoral or intravenous injection.
Despite the great promise of PTA, some critical issues associated with its clinical translation remain to be addressed to fully realize the therapeutic potential of this treatment modality. For example, how much NIR flux (or laser dose) is required, and how many nanoparticles are needed to obliterate tumor cells without adversely affecting surrounding normal cells? What happens at the molecular and cellular levels at different stages of PTA? And how can response to PTA, particularly at an early stage of treatment, be monitored noninvasively and repeatedly with high accuracy?
Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of PTA in the clinic is currently based on anatomic imaging such as CT, MRI, or ultrasonography (e.g., Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors of the World Health Organization). However, morphologic changes usually do not occur until 2–3 mo after the start of treatment, and furthermore, volume measurements can be hampered by necrotic tissue or scar formation. PET using 18F-FDG has long been recognized as a tool for therapy response assessment, revealing highly predictive values only 1–2 wk after the start of a therapy (11,12). The use of PET to measure therapeutic response has many advantages over biopsy- and surrogate tissue–based measurements, including the direct measurement of heterogeneous tumors and metastases repeatedly over time, with reduced statistical bias (13–16). However, 18F-FDG is not specific for cancer cells; inflammatory foci, sarcoidosis, and active tuberculosis are also shown as 18F-FDG–positive lesions. Because 18F-FDG accumulation is equally intense, it is challenging to differentiate malignant from inflammatory lesions due to increased glucose metabolism rates (17,18).
The positron emitter 64Cu (half-life, 12.7 h) has been explored for use in PET in numerous recent studies (9,19). The well-established coordination chemistry of copper allows for its reaction with a wide variety of chelator systems that can potentially be linked to small-molecule peptides, antibodies, proteins, and nanoparticles (19). Compared with 18F, 64Cu has a longer half-life as is compatible with the time required for the optimal biodistribution of slower-clearing agents, which require longer imaging times.
Hypericin is a potent naturally occurring photodynamic agent, inducing apoptosis or necrosis of cancer cells when combined with light (20). Because the compound showed a peculiar affinity for irreversibly damaged ischemic or necrotic tissues, hypericin has also been recognized as a nonporphyrin necrosis–avid agent (21). Radiolabeled derivatives of hypericin such as 123I-iodohypericin have been studied in animal models of hepatic and myocardial infarction, though their mechanisms of action are still unclear (22,23). We hypothesized that hypericin derivatives can be used for early assessment of PTA-induced necrosis and that their affinity for necrosis could be attributed to their binding to phospholipids that normally reside in the interior of the cell membrane but are exposed to the exterior environment when the cell membrane is damaged, as in the case of necrosis. In this work, we report the synthesis and characterization of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin and its use in assessing necrotic response in BT474 breast tumor xenografts that have undergone PTA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Synthesis, Characterization, and Radiolabeling of Bis-DOTA-Hypericin
Supplemental Figure 1 (supplemental materials are available online only at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) shows the synthesis scheme for bis-DOTA-hypericin. Detailed synthetic procedures are also provided in the supplemental materials. For radiolabeling, 64CuCl2 (18.5–148 MBq) in 0.1 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) was added to 12.5 μg of bis-DOTA-hypericin in water. The reaction mixture was incubated at 70°C for 45 min. The progress of the reaction was monitored by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with a radio detector.
Synthesis of CuS Nanoparticles
A detailed procedure for the synthesis of citrate-coated CuS nanoparticles in water has been described previously (9). Briefly, 1 mL of sodium sulfide solution (Na2S, 1 M) under stirring at room temperature was added into 1,000 mL of an aqueous solution of CuCl2 (0.1345 g, 1 mmol) and sodium citrate (0.2 g, 0.68 mmol). The pale blue CuCl2 solution turned dark brown immediately after the sodium sulfide was added. Five minutes later, the reaction mixture was heated to 90°C and stirred for 15 min until a dark green solution was obtained. The mixture was transferred to ice-cold water. The citrate-coated nanoparticles were obtained and stored at 4°C. To introduce polyethylene glycol coating, about 1 mg of sulfhydryl-polyethylene glycol (SH–PEG) was added into the citrate–CuS nanoparticle solution (1.42 × 1015 nanoparticles in 1.0 mL of water). The reaction was allowed to proceed overnight at room temperature. Supplemental Figure 2 shows a transmission electron microscopy image and the absorption spectrum of citrate–CuS nanoparticles.
Cell Line and Animal Models
To create the BT474 breast tumor xenografts, we used 6- to 8-wk-old female nude mice (Charles River Laboratories). All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The human mammary cancer BT474 cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and F-12 medium (Invitrogen Corp.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Hyclone) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin and were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 and 100% humidity. One 17β-estradiol pellet (5 mg/pellet, catalog no. SE-121; Innovative Research of America) was implanted subcutaneously in the back of each mouse 1 d before subcutaneous injection of tumor cells (1 × 107 cells) in the right front flank. When the tumors reached approximately 8–10 mm in diameter, the mice were randomly divided into a treated group (TG) and nontreated group (N-TG; controls). All mice in the TG received an intratumoral injection of 10 μL of CuS nanoparticle solution (4 × 1013 nanoparticles/mL), and their tumors were irradiated with an NIR laser (808 nm, 12 W/cm2 for 3 min) 24 h later. The mice in both groups were intravenously injected with 64Cu-Bis-DOTA-hypericin (24 h after laser treatment in the TG).
Laser Treatment
A continuous-wave GCSLX-05-1600m-1 fiber-coupled diode laser with a center wavelength of 808 ± 10 nm was used. It was powered by a DH 1715A-5 dual-regulated power supply (15PLUS Laser; Diomed). A 5-m, 600-μm core BioTex LCM-001 optical fiber (BioTex Inc.) was used to transfer laser power from the laser unit to the target. The output power was independently calibrated using a handheld model 840-C optical power meter (Newport Corp.) and was found to be 1.5 W for a spot diameter of 4 mm (∼12 W/cm2) and a 2-amp supply current. The end of the optical fiber was attached to a retort stand using a movable clamp and positioned directly above the tumor.
In Vitro Study of PTA with CuS Nanoparticles in BT474 Cells
BT474 cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate with a density of 10,000 cells per well 1 d before the experiment. Cells were washed 3 times with Hanks balanced salt solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and then were treated with CuS nanoparticles alone (1 mM), NIR laser alone, or CuS nanoparticles followed by NIR laser 2 h after CuS nanoparticle treatment. Nontreated cells were used as a control. For laser treatment, cells were irradiated with a diode NIR laser (15PLUS Laser; Diomed) centered at 808 nm at an output power of 12 W/cm2 for 3 min. The laser was coupled to a 1-m-long, 2-mm-core-diameter fiber, which delivered a circular laser beam (diameter, 4 mm), covering the central area of the microplate well. After treatment, cells were resupplied with RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) without phenol red containing 10% FBS. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were washed with Hanks balanced salt solution and stained with calcein AM for visualization of viable cells and with EthD-1 for visualization of dead cells according to the manufacturer's suggested protocol (Invitrogen). Cells were examined under an Axio Observer.Z1 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH). Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Cell Uptake
BT474 cells in a 12-well plate were incubated with approximately 3 × 1011 CuS nanoparticles/mL in 0.2 mL of DMEM at 37°C for 2 h. Cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline, and then DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS without phenol red was added. Cells either were not treated with the NIR laser or were irradiated at a dose of 12 W/cm2 for 3 min. After irradiation, the cells were cultured with fresh complete DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS for 24 h. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The cells were scraped and transferred into 2-mL tubes and coincubated with 0.37 MBq/μL (10 μCi/μL) of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin at 37°C for 1 h. Next, 500 μL of a 75:25 mixture of silicon oil (density, 1.05; Sigma-Aldrich) and mineral oil (density, 0.872; Acros) were added into the cell suspension. The mixture was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The tubes were frozen in liquid nitrogen, the bottom tips containing the cell pellet were cut off, and the cell pellets and supernatants were collected and counted for radioactivity. The data were expressed as activity ratios of the cell pellet to the medium ([cpm/ug of protein in pellet/cpm/ug of medium] × 100%).
Preparation of Small Unilamellar Vesicles
Small unilamellar vesicles were prepared as described previously (24). Briefly, rotary evaporation under reduced pressure of the chloroform phospholipid stock solution (Avanti Polar Lipids Inc.) resulted in a thin lipid film on the sides of a round-bottom flask. The lipid films were thoroughly dried to remove residual organic solvent by rotation under a vacuum for 2 h. Hydration of each lipid film was achieved by the addition of 10 mM N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N′-(2-ethanesulfonic acid) buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2.5 mM CaCl2 and 100 mM NaCl to give a final 5 mM concentration of phospholipid vesicles. This suspension was then thoroughly mixed for 2 h on a rotary evaporation system without a vacuum. The resultant hydrated vesicles were then stored on dry ice overnight. Before loading to the L1 chip surface, the vesicles were extruded 20 times through a 50-nm polycarbonate filter using an extrusion apparatus to give small unilamellar vesicles composed of phosphatidylserine only, phosphatidylethanolamine only, or phosphatidylcholine only or composed of a mixture of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine (phosphatidylethanolamine/phosphatidylcholine, 1:1).
Surface Plasmon Resonance Measurements
A Biacore 3000 apparatus (Biacore Life Sciences) equipped with an L1 chip was used for surface plasmon resonance measurements using 10 mM N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N′-(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl), with or without 2.5 mM CaCl2 as the running buffer. The buffer solution was filtered through a 0.22-μm filter and degassed thoroughly. The L1 chips were coated with vesicles by injecting 20 μL of 5 mM phospholipid vesicle suspension at a rate of 5 μL/min for 20 min, conditioned with 3 consecutive injections of isopropanol/50 mM NaOH (2:3, v/v), each at 30 μL/min for 1 min. Solutions of bis-DOTA-hypericin at various concentrations in the running buffer were injected over the flow cells at a flow rate of 20 μL/min for predetermined periods. The bis-DOTA-hypericin solution was then replaced with the running buffer to allow it to dissociate. Binding levels expressed as a response unit (RU) were recorded for all injections before and after the onset of dissociation. The specific binding profiles of the peptides to phosphatidylserine were obtained by subtracting the response signal of the control flow cell coated with phosphatidylcholine from the total phosphatidylserine binding signal. The analysis was performed in duplicate at concentrations ranging from 0.325 to 25 μM. A sensorgram was obtained by plotting the RU against time. An increase in RU from the injection point and a decrease in RU from the beginning of the washing step, as measures of association and dissociation, respectively, were determined and used to compare binding affinities. After each injection–dissociation cycle, the flow cell surfaces were regenerated by injection of isopropanol and 50 mM NaOH solution.
Small-Animal PET and Biodistribution
An R4 microPET unit (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.), which has an approximate resolution of 2 mm in each axial direction, was used for imaging. After a tail vein injection of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin (5.55–7.4 MBq/0.1 mL [150–200 μCi/0.1 mL]), a 20-min prone scan was obtained at 2, 6, and 24 h after injection. Mice were maintained under anesthesia with 1%–2% isoflurane, and a heating lamp was used to maintain their body temperature during acquisition. Small-animal PET images were reconstructed with the ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm using 16 subsets and 4 iterations.
Irregular 3-dimensional regions of interest were manually drawn around the edge of the tumor activity by visual inspection using ASIpro VM software (Analysis Tools and System Setup/Diagnostics Tool; Siemens Medical Solutions USA). Separate regions of interest were drawn for each scan because the tumor size tended to change 24 h after treatment. The mean activities within the regions of interest were recorded. Assuming a tissue density of 1 g/mL, the regions of interest were converted to MBq/g and then divided by the administered activity to obtain a percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) derived from the imaging region of interest.
Immediately after the last imaging session at 24 h after injection, the mice were killed. Blood, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, lung, stomach, intestine, muscle, bone, brain, and tumor tissues were removed and weighed, and radioactivity was measured with a Cobra γ-counter (Packard Cobra). The uptake of 64Cu-labeled hypericin in the various organs was calculated as the %ID/g.
Histopathology and Autoradiography
Of each tumor collected at 24 h after injection, one half was used to measure the radioactivity count and the other half was snap-frozen with optimum-cutting-temperature compound (Sakura Finetek) and sectioned into 6–8 consecutive 5-μm slices. One slice was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and the other slices were stained for autoradiography. For autoradiography, the slices were dried at 40°C in open air. The sections were then photographed and exposed on BAS-SR 2025 Fuji phosphorous film, and the film was scanned with the FLA5100 Multifunctional Imaging System (Fujifilm Medical Systems USA).
Statistical Analysis
Group variation was described as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the uptake at different time points in the TG and N-TG at 2, 6, and 24 h. Means were compared using 1-way ANOVA. A P value of less than 0.05 was assigned statistical significance.
RESULTS
64Cu Labeling and Stability of 64Cu-Bis-DOTA-Hypericin
The synthesis of bis-DOTA-hypericin and 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin is shown in Supplemental Figure 1A. Radio–high-performance liquid chromatography analysis showed that the labeling efficiency was 97.7%. Supplemental Figures 1B and 1C show high-performance liquid chromatograms of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin recorded using a sodium crystal radiodetector and ultraviolet–visible light detector at 254 nm, confirming that the radiochemical purity of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin was greater than 95%. The structure of the DOTA-hypericin was confirmed by mass spectrometry.
In Vitro PTA Mediated with CuS Nanoparticles and Cell Uptake of 64Cu-Bis-DOTA-Hypericin
Exposure of BT474 cells to both CuS nanoparticles and NIR laser caused significantly greater cell death than exposure to CuS nanoparticles alone or NIR laser alone. The membranes of cells treated with PTA were damaged, as indicated by the uptake of the red, cell-impermeable EthD-1 dye in the cells treated with CuS nanoparticles and NIR laser (Fig. 1A). Also, BT474 cells treated with CuS nanoparticles and irradiated with NIR laser had a significantly higher uptake of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin than cells exposed to CuS nanoparticles only (Fig. 1B). The uptake of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin in laser-treated dead cells was reduced by 54% in the presence of an excess amount of cold hypericin (Supplemental Fig. 3).
(A) In vitro PTA mediated with CuS nanoparticles. BT474 cells were exposed to CuS nanoparticles (1 mM) alone, NIR laser alone (808 nm, 15 mW/cm2, 3 min), or combination of CuS nanoparticles and NIR laser. Cells exposed to both CuS nanoparticles and laser caused extensive cell death. Right side of curve indicates area irradiated with NIR laser; left side indicates area treated with CuS nanoparticle but not irradiated with laser. (B) Uptake of 64Cu-Bis-DOTA-hypericin in BT474 cells. Radiotracer had significantly higher uptake in treated cells than in nontreated cells. NP = nanoparticles.
Surface Plasmon Resonance Screening of Phosphatidylserine-Binding Peptides
Figure 2 represents sensorgrams of bis-DOTA-hypericin used as an analyte obtained on a phosphatidylserine-coated L1 sensor chip (Fig. 2A) and a phosphatidylethanolamine–phosphatidylcholine-coated L1 sensor chip (Fig. 2B). A summary of binding levels at the end of association and dissociation phases for bis-DOTA-hypericin is also presented in Figure 2. The surface plasmon resonance experiment showed that bis-DOTA-hypericin had a higher binding affinity to phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine than to phosphatidylcholine.
Surface plasmon resonance sensorgrams of bis-DOTA-hypericin obtained on sensor chips immobilized with phosphatidylserine (A) and phosphatidylethanolamine (B). Sensorgrams were obtained by subtracting RU of control flow cell coated with phosphatidylcholine from total binding signal from flow cells coated with either phosphatidylserine or phosphatidylethanolamine–phosphatidylcholine. Binding profiles were performed in duplicate at bis-DOTA-hypericin concentrations ranging from 0.375 to 12 μM.
Small-Animal PET and Biodistribution
All tumors in the PTA group were clearly visible at 2–24 h after injection of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin, whereas a rather low uptake of the radiotracer was seen in the N-TG at all time points. The highest uptake in the TG was observed at 24 h after injection (Fig. 3A). Quantitative imaging analysis showed a significantly higher tumor uptake of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin in the TG mice than in the N-TG mice (P < 0.05). The tumor uptake values at 2, 6, and 24 h after injection in the TG were 0.80 ± 0.14 %ID/g, 1.19 ± 0.45 %ID/g, and 1.49 ± 0.68 %ID/g, respectively. The values at 2, 6, and 24 h after injection in the N-TG were 0.57 ± 0.06 %ID/g, 0.50 ± 0.63 %ID/g, and 0.53 ± 0.18 %ID/g, respectively (Fig. 3B).
(A) Representative small-animal PET images of mice treated with CuS nanoparticles (intratumoral injection, 10 μL, 4 × 1013 nanoparticles/mL), followed by NIR laser (808 nm, 12 W/cm2, 3 min), and nontreated control mice after intravenous injection of 64Cu-Bis-DOTA-hypericin (5.55–7.4 MBq). (B) Tumor uptake values obtained from quantitative imaging analysis. Treated tumors had significantly higher uptake than nontreated tumors at 2, 6, and 24 h after radiotracer injection. Data are expressed as mean and SD (n = 4–5).
The biodistribution data were consistent with the PET findings (Fig. 4). At 24 h after injection, the tumor uptake was significantly higher (1.71 ± 0.43 %ID/g) in the TG mice than in the N-TG mice (0.76 ± 0.19 %ID/g) (P = 0.017). Liver and kidney had the highest uptake of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin. There were no differences in other organs between the TG and N-TG mice.
Biodistribution of 64Cu-Bis-DOTA-hypericin at 24 h after injection. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 4–5).
Correlation of High-Uptake Areas on Small-Animal PET with H&E Findings
In conventional histology (H&E), tumors undergoing CuS nanoparticle and NIR treatment showed signs of cell damage or injury of various extents. Tumor cells displayed nuclear pyknosis and cytoplasmic edema, with patches of eosinophilic tumor necrosis evident. Thromboses of the larger adjacent vessels were found on the tumor–muscle border. The untreated tumors were composed of viable hematoxylinophilic malignant cells in large quantity. Figure 5 compares autoradiographs of tumors from mice treated with PTA and untreated mice at 24 h after 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin injection. 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin showed higher uptake in treated tumors (Fig. 5A), which correlated with areas of injured tumor cells on histologic slides stained with H&E. In contrast, the tumors from nontreated mice had relatively lower uptake of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin, which corresponded with the presence of a large number of viable tumor cells (Fig. 5B).
Autoradiographs and photographs of corresponding H&E-stained tumor section from treated tumors (A) and nontreated tumors (B). 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin showed higher uptake in treated tumors, corresponding with areas of injured tumor cells.
DISCUSSION
Our study demonstrates that 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin can be used to assess therapeutic response induced by PTA. A significantly higher accumulation of 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin was observed in tumors treated with CuS nanoparticles plus NIR laser than in nontreated tumors. 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin small-animal PET could differentiate treated from nontreated tumors as early as 24 h after PTA treatment (Figs. 3 and 4).
In PTA, photothermal coupling agents are used to mediate increases in the local temperatures far above the threshold (∼54°C) at which irreversible cell death occurs. Thermal ablation kills cells directly by inducing cellular injury, leading to necrosis (3). To ensure the safety and efficacy of such a procedure, the nanoparticles have to be delivered to the target volume, and the extent of therapy and early response to treatment have to be monitored properly. Therefore, successful translation of PTA into the clinic will require the accurate visualization and quantification of the accumulation of photothermal-conducting nanoparticles in the tumors for pretreatment planning, noninvasive monitoring of the spatiotemporal heat profile and response to therapy in a given target volume, and selective delivery of nanoparticles to the tumor.
The accumulation of nanoparticles in tumors has been noninvasively evaluated by PET using photothermal-conducting nanoparticles labeled with the positron-emitting radionuclide 64Cu (25). It has also been proposed that MRI may be used to detect the intratumoral distribution of photothermal-conducting nanoparticles using gold nanostructures encapsulated with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (26). MRI can also provide real-time temperature-sensitive imaging feedback during therapy (4).
In this work, we addressed the problem associated with noninvasive assessment of therapeutic response induced by PTA. Semiconductor CuS nanoparticles that showed a strong absorption in the NIR region, high photothermal conducting efficiency, low cytotoxicity, and small particle size were chosen as the PTA agent (9,10). Irradiation of tumor cells exposed to CuS nanoparticles with an NIR laser caused marked cell death in BT474 tumors both in vitro and in vivo, characterized by cell membrane damage (Fig. 1) and extensive tumor damage (Fig. 5).
Hypericin is a naturally occurring photosensitizer derived from St. John's wort (27). As a photodynamic sensitizer, hypericin is able to generate superoxide anion and singlet oxygen with a high quantum yield. When combined with light, hypericin can effectively induce apoptosis or necrosis of cancer cells. Although not evaluated in this work, 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin may also be an efficient photodynamic agent and thus may be suitable for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Van de Putte et al. (21,28) investigated the distribution of hypericin in a murine liver tumor model and found that hypericin was a necrosis-avid agent. They showed that hypericin specifically stained necrotic tissue by interacting with necrotic cellular debris. Our experiment with PTA-treated BT474 tumors suggested that 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin as a hypericin derivative is associated with injured rather than viable tumor cells. Therefore, 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin is a new radiotracer suitable for noninvasive imaging of PTA-induced tumor damage by small-animal PET.
Although the affinity of hypericin to necrotic tissues has been reported, little is known about the mechanism of this affinity. The membrane of the cell is made up of 4 principal phospholipid components: phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, and sphingomyelin. These 4 phospholipids are distributed between the 2 monolayers of the membrane in an asymmetric fashion, with phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin largely populating the extracellular leaflet and phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylserine restricted primarily to the inner leaflet (29). There is abundant evidence suggesting that phosphatidylserine externalization is a contributing factor to the recognition of dead and dying cells by macrophages (30). Because inflammatory cells are reported to express phosphatidylserine on their cell surface (31–33), and inflammation and malignancy often go together, 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin may also be used to assess tumor inflammation. Our finding that bis-DOTA-hypericin had differential binding to phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine, as compared with phosphatidylcholine (Fig. 2), the most common and abundant phosphatidyl lipid on the surface of the plasma membrane, suggests that selective binding to phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine in damaged cells with disintegrated cell membranes may be one of the contributing factors responsible for the affinity of hypericin for necrosis.
CONCLUSION
Our studies demonstrate that 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin has a high binding affinity to damaged tumor cells and, thus, a potential use in the noninvasive assessment of early tumor response to PTA with PET. The mechanism of the affinity of hypericin to necrotic cells can be explained, at least in part, by the loss of the cell membrane integrity and subsequent exposure of phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine to the extracellular fluid and by selective binding of hypericin to phosphatidylserine–phosphatidylethanolamine, as compared with phosphatidylcholine. The ability to monitor response to CuS nanoparticle–mediated PTA should provide the opportunity for the noninvasive assessment of response to PTA and other thermal ablation techniques.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dawn Chalaire for editing the article. This work was funded in part by the John S. Dunn Foundation and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 30830038), the Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (grant S30203), and the European Commission Project Asia-Link (CfP 2006-EuropeAid/123738/C/ACT/Multi-Proposal No. 128-498/111).
Footnotes
↵* Contributed equally to this work.
- © 2011 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
REFERENCES
- Received for publication November 30, 2010.
- Accepted for publication January 31, 2011.