Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleTheranostics

Proof of Therapeutic Efficacy of a 177Lu-Labeled Neurotensin Receptor 1 Antagonist in a Colon Carcinoma Xenograft Model

Jörg Schulz, Martin Rohracker, Marvin Stiebler, Jürgen Goldschmidt, Franziska Stöber, Mercedes Noriega, Anette Pethe, Mathias Lukas, Frank Osterkamp, Ulrich Reineke, Aileen Höhne, Christiane Smerling and Holger Amthauer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2017, 58 (6) 936-941; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.185140
Jörg Schulz
1Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Rohracker
1Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marvin Stiebler
1Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jürgen Goldschmidt
2Leibniz-Institut für Neurobiologie, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franziska Stöber
1Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg, Germany
2Leibniz-Institut für Neurobiologie, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mercedes Noriega
3Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anette Pethe
1Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mathias Lukas
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
5Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Osterkamp
63B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Reineke
63B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aileen Höhne
63B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christiane Smerling
63B Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holger Amthauer
1Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg, Germany
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Increased expression of neurotensin receptor 1 (NTR1) has been shown in a large number of tumor entities such as pancreatic or colon carcinoma. Hence, this receptor is a promising target for diagnostic imaging and radioligand therapy. Using the favorable biodistribution data of the NTR1-targeting agent 111In-3BP-227, we investigated the therapeutic effect of its 177Lu-labeled analog on the tumor growth of NTR1-positive HT29 colon carcinoma xenografts. Methods: 3BP-227 was labeled with 177Lu. To assess its biodistribution properties, SPECT and CT scans of HT29-xenografted nude mice injected with 177Lu-3BP-227 were acquired, and ex vivo tissue activity was determined. To evaluate therapeutic efficacy, 2 groups of mice received the radiopharmaceutical in a median dose of either 165 MBq (129–232 MBq, n = 10) or 110 MBq (82–116 MBq, n = 10), whereas control mice were injected with vehicle (n = 10). Tumor sizes and body weights were monitored for up to 49 d. Renal function and histologic morphology were evaluated. Results: Whole-body SPECT/CT images allowed clear tumor visualization with low background activity and high tumor-to-kidney and -liver ratios. Ex vivo biodistribution data confirmed high and persistent uptake of 177Lu-3BP-227 in HT29 tumors (19.0 ± 3.6 vs. 2.7 ± 1.6 percentage injected dose per gram at 3 and 69 h after injection, respectively). The application of 177Lu-3BP-227 resulted in a distinct delay of tumor growth. Median tumor doubling time for controls was 5.5 d (interquartile range [IQR], 2.8–7.0), compared with 17.5 d (IQR, 5.5–22.5 d) for the 110-MBq and 41.0 d (IQR, 27.5–55.0) for the 165-MBg group. Compared with controls, median relative tumor volume at day 23 after injection was reduced by 55% (P = 0.034) in the 110-MBq and by 88% (P < 0.01) in the 165-MBq group. Renal histology and clinical chemistry results did not differ between radiotherapy groups and controls, suggesting absence of therapy-induced acute renal damage. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that the novel NTR1-targeting theranostic agent 3BP-227 is an effective and promising candidate for radioligand therapy, with a favorable preliminary safety profile and high potential for clinical translation.

  • NTR1 radiotracer
  • xenograft
  • SPECT/CT
  • theranostic
  • oncology

See an invited perspective on this article on page 934.

The successful diagnosis and therapy of somatostatin receptor–positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with 177Lu- and 90Y-labeled somatostatin analogs (1,2) demonstrate the high potential of neuropeptide receptor–based imaging and radioligand therapy (RLT). Because the range of somatostatin receptor–positive tumor entities is limited, other neuropeptide receptor systems such as the neurotensinergic system have been evaluated as targets for RLT. Neurotensin receptors (NTRs) mediate the effects of the neuropeptide hormone neurotensin, which acts as neuromodulator and peripherally as para- and endocrine factor in the gastrointestinal system (3). Physiologically, NTRs are mainly expressed in the central nervous as well as intestinal and hepatic system (4). Of the 3 known NTR subtypes, NTR1 is the primary mediator of neurotensin signaling because of its subnanomolar affinity to its natural ligand.

In colon carcinoma, breast cancer, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, NTR1 expression has been associated with neoplastic progression (5–8). Furthermore, autoradiographic studies have shown that NTR1 is expressed in pancreatic adenocarcinoma in high densities of 103–104 dpm/mg in primary tumors (9) and metastases (8). Ewing’s sarcoma, small cell lung cancer, and medullary thyroid carcinoma express similar densities, although a few individual tumors express receptor densities below 103 dpm/mg (10). These receptor densities are in a range similar to the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst2) densities found in neuroendocrine tumors when tested autoradiographically using an sst2 agonist (11). Therefore, NTR1-targeting RLT for NTR1-expressing tumors may become a therapy similar in effectiveness to today's use of somatostatin analog–based RLT for neuroendocrine tumors.

An approximately 10-fold-higher number of binding sites has been demonstrated in various tumor entities using an sst2 antagonist than using an sst2 agonist (12). Several other studies have also revealed higher numbers of binding sites and increased tumor uptake for radiolabeled somatostatin and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonists compared with agonists (13–15), which can be explained by the recognition of more conformational receptor states by the antagonist than the agonist (16). Hypothesizing that antagonist-based NTR1-targeting radiotracers might exhibit better tumor–to–normal-tissue uptake ratios than previously reported agonistic agents (17,18), Osterkamp et al. decided to modify the known NTR1 antagonist SR142948A (19,20) to allow attachment of the chelator DOTA (21). This strategy allows the formation of highly stable complexes with metal radionuclides such as 111In, 68Ga, 90Y, and 177Lu, and therefore enables use of the novel antagonistic derivatives as theranostic agents for a wide range of clinical applications such as SPECT or PET and RLT. We reported recently the favorable biodistribution profiles of the 111In-labeled NTR1 antagonists 3BP-227 and 3BP-228, exhibiting high tumor and low normal-tissue uptake, with 3BP-227 yielding a more persistent tumor uptake (22). The aim of this follow-up study was to evaluate the antitumoral effect of 177Lu-labeled 3BP-227 in the standard xenograft model in NTR1-targeted RLT, subcutaneous HT29 colon carcinoma tumors, and ultimately to gauge its potential for clinical translation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiolabeling

3BP-227 (35–40 μg) in buffer (0.4 M acetate, 0.325 M gentisic acid, pH 5) was incubated with 2.0–3.1 GBq of 177LuCl3 (in 0.04 M HCl; Isotope Technologies Garching GmbH). The mixture was heated at 95°C for 30 min. After being cooled, the product was analyzed by thin-layer and high-performance liquid chromatography as previously described (22) and formulated in 0.9% NaCl for intravenous administration.

Cell Culture and Tumor Model

NTR1-positive HT29 human colorectal carcinoma cells (European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures and Cell Lines Services) (23) were grown in McCoy’s 5A modified medium (Biochrom) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, penicillin (10,000 U/mL), and streptomycin (10 mg/mL) at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Experiments were approved by the local animal welfare committee and performed according to national regulations. Mice were kept in an individually ventilated cage system under standard conditions with food and water ad libitum. HT29 cells (2–3 × 106 cells) were inoculated subcutaneously in the flank of 6- to 8-wk-old athymic ν-ν female mice (Nude-Foxn1nu; Harlan Laboratories).

SPECT/CT Imaging

SPECT/CT whole-body imaging was performed at 3, 20, 45, 69, and 93 h after injection of 177Lu-3BP-227 in 2 mice (159.7 and 130.7 MBq, respectively). Images were acquired under isoflurane anesthesia (1%–2% isoflurane in 2:1 O2:N2O volume ratio) with a 4-head NanoSPECT/CT scanner (Mediso Ltd.). CT and SPECT were coregistered. Whole-body CT scans were acquired at pixel sizes of 192 μm and reconstructed with the manufacturer’s software (InVivoScope 1.43) at isotropic voxel sizes of 200 μm. Whole-body SPECT scans were acquired using a multipinhole collimator set (SCIVIS), each collimator with 9 pinholes (1.4-mm pinhole diameter, ≤ 1.0 mm nominal resolution). Photopeaks were set to the default values of the NanoSPECT for 177Lu (57, 113, and 208 keV, each ± 10%). Acquisition time was 60 min. SPECT scans were reconstructed using the manufacturer’s software (HiSPECT; SCIVIS) at isotropic voxel output sizes of 300–600 μm, depending on counting rates.

Ex Vivo Biodistribution Study

Mice were injected with 4.0 ± 0.7 MBq of 177Lu-3BP-227 and sacrificed under isoflurane anesthesia 3, 20, or 69 h later (n = 5 per time point). Tissues of interest and urine were removed and weighed, and their activity content was determined by well-counter measurement. Tissue counts and injected dose for individual mice were decay-corrected to the time of euthanasia. Tissue uptake is expressed as the percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g).

RLT

Radiopharmaceutical or vehicle injection was performed 7 d after tumor cell inoculation (day 0). At this time, tumors had reached a mean volume of 90 mm3. Mice were divided into 3 groups of 10, receiving either a median dose of 110 MBq (82–116 MBq) or 165 MBq (129–232 MBq) of 177Lu-3BP-227 or vehicle (0.9% NaCl) via a lateral tail vein. One mouse in the 165-MBq group had to be excluded from analysis because of a failed injection. Tumor measurements by digital caliper, determinations of body weight, and assessments of clinical status were performed 3 times a week beginning at the day of active agent or vehicle injection (day 0). Tumor volume was calculated according to the formula V = (π/6)LW2 (L = largest, W = shortest diameter of the tumor). Because the average tumor sizes in the 3 groups were not equal on day 0, individual tumor measurements were normalized to their initial value at day 0 and are presented as relative tumor volume (Vday after injection/V0). Endpoint criteria were defined as relative body weight (body weight at day after injection divided by weight on day 0) < 0.85; tumor volume > 1,500 mm3 or largest diameter ≥ 15 mm; exulceration or invasive growth of the tumor; and clinical abnormalities such as apathy, labored respiration, impaired movement, or abnormal posture. The study was terminated after a maximum observation time of 49 d.

Kidney Function and Morphology

To investigate potential induction of renal damage by 177Lu-3BP-227, kidney sections were histologically examined. For this purpose, the kidneys of 3 mice of the 165-MBq, 110-MBq, and control groups were collected after they reached endpoint criteria or the end of the investigation period. Organs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Dewaxed sections were either stained with periodic acid–Schiff reagent, hematoxylin and eosin, or Masson Trichrom staining. Specimens were evaluated by a trained nephropathologist. Furthermore, blood samples were taken via heart puncture directly after euthanasia. Serum concentrations of creatinine and urea were measured using standard techniques of clinical chemistry. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and cystatin C concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Mouse NGAL ELISA Kit [BioPorto Diagnostics A/S]; Mouse Cystatin C ELISA Kit [Boster Biologic Technology Co., Inc.]) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Data Analysis

OsiriX MD (open source version 1.3, 64-bit) was used to analyze SPECT/CT data. Regions of interest for kidneys and tumors were drawn manually on transaxial CT slices. Volumes of interest were compiled of 2-dimensional regions of interest delineating the entire extent of each examined tissue and transferred to corresponding SPECT slices for quantification of counts in the volumes of interest.

Dosimetric calculations for selected tissues were performed using the sphere model of OLINDA/EXM software (version 1.1) (24) and monoexponential fitting of kinetic data. The tumor mass was assumed to be constant using the barycenter of the mass over time function. The resulting absorbed doses have to be considered rough estimates because of the limited number of time points and the imperfect tumor’s spheric shape.

SPSS Statistics (83-bit version 22.0.0.0; IBM) was used for statistical analysis and data visualization. Statistical analysis of differences of medians of relative tumor volume, tumor doubling times, relative body weight, and kidney parameters was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Mann–Whitney U test for multiple comparisons or Mann–Whitney U test for analyzing differences between 2 groups. For evaluation of the results of the RLT study, a Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were performed. The endpoint was defined as reaching a relative tumor volume of 2 or greater. Differences of P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Radiolabeling

177Lu radiolabeling yields of 3BP-227 were 95% or more based on thin-layer and high-performance liquid chromatography. Specific activities were 56.5 for the imaging and 59.9 MBq/nmol for the biodistribution study, and 59.3 MBq/nmol for the 110-MBq group and 87.6 MBq/nmol for the 165-MBq group in the therapy setting.

SPECT/CT Imaging

177Lu-3BP-227-SPECT/CT imaging of HT29-xenografted nude mice visualized the tumor clearly. At 3 h after injection, distinct background activity was still present, representing circulating radiotracer as well as urorenal and intestinal accretion (Fig. 1). By 20, 45, 69, and 93 h after injection tumor uptake clearly exceeded uptake in the kidneys and liver. The tumor–to–kidney activity ratio of the animal depicted in Figure 1 continuously increased from 1.19 at 3 h after injection to 5.66 at 93 h after injection (3.26 at 20 h after injection, 3.89 at 45 h after injection, 4.65 at 69 h after injection). The tumor–to–liver activity ratio was 1.35 at 3 h after injection, rising to a constantly high level in the following acquisitions (3.20 at 20 h after injection, 3.21 at 45 h after injection, 3.31 at 69 h after injection, 3.76 at 93 h after injection). These data indicate a slower washout from tumor than from renal and hepatic tissue. Tumor uptake was persistent—at 93 h after injection, still 34% of the decay-corrected activity determined at the first acquisition was still present in the tumor. The second mouse in the imaging study showed a similar distribution profile (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Coregistered whole-body SPECT/CT scans of a single female nude mouse grafted with HT29 tumor cells acquired 3 (A), 20 (B), 45 (C), 69 (D), and 93 (E) h after injection of 130.7 MBq of 177Lu-3BP-227. Arrows show HT29 tumors. SPECT data were scaled to 0%–75% of maximum count value in the tumor of the respective dataset. B = Urinary bladder; K = Kidney.

Ex Vivo Biodistribution Study

The ex vivo biodistribution data for 177Lu-3BP-227 confirmed a high and persistent tumor accumulation (Fig. 2; Supplemental Table 1). HT29 uptake at 3 h after injection was 19.0 ± 3.6 %ID/g, 8.6 ± 4.0 %ID/g at 20 h after injection, and 2.7 ± 1.6 %ID/g at 69 h after injection. A mean absorbed radiation dose of 830 mGy/MBq of 177Lu was estimated for the tumor. Low and over time decreasing activity was measured in the kidneys. Tumor-to-kidney ratios rose from 5.2 ± 2.5 at 3 h after injection to 6.3 ± 4.3 at 20 h and 15.9 ± 19.3 at 69 h after injection, respectively, indicating a faster washout of these critical organs than from target tissue. At each time point after injection, tumor uptake exceeded uptake in all other examined tissues considerably. In our dosimetry estimation this translated into low extrapolated human body and organ doses (Supplemental Table 2).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Uptake of 177Lu-3BP-227 in selected tissues 3, 20, and 69 h after injection (mean %ID/g ± SD). n = 5 mice per time point. p.i. = after injection.

RLT

Two groups of HT29-grafted nude mice were injected with a median dose of either 110 MBq (82–116 MBq) or 165 MBq (129–232 MBq) of 177Lu-3BP-227, corresponding to an average injected mass of approximately 1.9 nmol in both groups. Tumor volumes of control animals having received 0.9% NaCl vehicle injections instead of 177Lu-3BP-227 increased rapidly, with a median doubling time of 5.5 d (interquartile range, 2.8–7.0 d) (Fig. 3). Treatment with 177Lu-3BP-227 induced a marked slowing of tumor growth. In the 110-MBq group, the median doubling time was 17.5 d (interquartile range, 5.5–22.5 d) (P = 0.022 vs. control) and in the 165-MBq group it was prolonged to 41.0 d (interquartile range, 27.5–55.0 d) (P < 0.001 vs. control; P = 0.015 vs. 110-MBq group). At day 23 after injection, most animals in the control group reached tumor volumes that necessitated euthanasia. At this time, median relative tumor volume in the 110-MBq group was reduced by 55% (P = 0.034) and by 88% in the 165-MBq group (P < 0.01) compared with controls. Differences in relative tumor volume between the 110-MBq group and controls were statistically significant from day 7 after injection (P < 0.05). Between the 165-MBq group and controls, differences were statistically significant from day 4 after injection (P < 0.01). Application of 110 MBq of 111Lu-3BP-227 stabilized tumor size up to a median relative tumor volume level of approximately 2 until day 20 after injection, whereupon tumor growth proceeded similar to controls. The observation of animals receiving 110 MBq was terminated at day 38 after injection when most of the mice reached endpoint criteria. In comparison to the 110-MBq group, median relative tumor volume in the 165-MBq group was 89% lower at this time (P = 0.009). The effect of 165 MBq of 177Lu-3BP-227 was more persistent, with a median relative tumor volume of only 2.4 by day 49 after injection. Absolute tumor volume data are shown in Supplemental Figure 2.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

(A) Therapeutic effect of 177Lu-3BP-227 in female nude mice grafted with HT29 cells. Tumor volume data are normalized to measurement at day of 177Lu-3BP-227 injection and represented as median and interquartile range. (B) Kaplan–Meier plot showing tumor progression of HT29 in same study. Endpoint was set at reaching relative tumor volume of ≥ 2. Control: n = 10; 165-MBq group: n = 9; 110-MBq group: n = 10.

Kaplan–Meier analysis (Fig. 3) was performed to demonstrate the tumor growth behavior of individual mice. Four of 9 mice in the 165-MBq group and 1 animal of 10 in the 110-MBq group did not reach the endpoint, set at reaching twice the initial tumor volume. Log-rank tests showed a significantly increased tumor doubling time after application of 177Lu-3BP-227 in comparison with controls (110 MBq vs. control P = 0.006, 165 MBq vs. control P < 0.001). Application of 165 MBq of the compound had a significantly stronger effect than 110 MBq (P = 0.013).

Evaluation of Acute Toxicity

When the relative body weight of the 3 groups was compared, 165- and 110-MBq groups showed an intermittent weight loss of 7.2% (P = 0.001) and 4.7% (P < 0.001), respectively, in relation to the controls at day 3–5 after injection. At day 7 after injection, the intervention groups recovered their initial body weight. Hereafter, progression of body mass of the 165-MBq group and the control converged, with no statistically significant differences, whereas body weights of the 110-MBq group initially stayed stable but then increased continuously, remaining, however, on an overall lower level than the other 2 groups (Supplemental Fig. 3).

None of the examined functional kidney parameters revealed a significant or relevant change for both 165- and 110-MBq groups versus controls (Fig. 4). No pathologic abnormalities, such as tubular damage, thrombotic microangiopathy, interstitial nephritis, or glomerulonephritis, were detectable. No histologic differences between the kidneys of 177Lu-3BP-227– and vehicle-injected mice were visible.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Serum concentrations of functional kidney biomarkers—creatinine (A), urea (B), cystatin C (C), and neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin (NGAL) (D)—of female nude mice grafted with HT29 cells obtained after injection of median dose of 165 or 110 MBq of 177Lu-3BP-227 or 0.9% NaCl as control. Sample sizes (165-MBq group/110-MBq group/control)—2/5/6 (A), 2/5/6 (B), 3/5/6 (C), and 3/5/2 (D). Statistical analysis comparing biomarker concentrations was performed by Kruskal–Wallis test, with no significant differences detected.

DISCUSSION

This study presents the first, to our knowledge, evaluation of the therapeutic effect of an NTR1-antagonistic radiopharmaceutical. 3BP-227 is equipped with a DOTA chelator, allowing incorporation of a range of diagnostic and therapeutic metal radionuclides (e.g., 68Ga for PET, 111In for SPECT, 90Y and 177Lu for RLT). This enables use of 3BP-227 as a theranostic agent, that is, 3BP-227 labeled with a diagnostic radionuclide could be used to assess NTR1 expression and suitability for 3BP-227–based RLT in an individualized precision medicine approach. This is important because NTR1 expression in different tumor types can vary substantially (8,9,10,25), and patient selection is warranted for a successful treatment.

On the basis of its advantageous physical properties for RLT especially of smaller tumors (half-life, 6.7 d; maximum energy, 0.5 MeV, corresponding to tissue penetration depth of 2 mm), we chose the β-emitter 177Lu as the therapeutic radionuclide for this study. Consistent with our previous report on the theranostic potential of 3BP-227 (22), the biodistribution profile of 177Lu-labeled 3BP-227 in NTR1-positive HT29 tumor–bearing mice confirmed high tumor accumulation and low uptake in normal tissues, leading to favorable tumor-to-kidney activity ratios (e.g., 3.2 at 20 h after injection). Persistent uptake of radiopharmaceuticals in normal tissues can compromise their therapeutic applicability because of potential radiotoxicity. In particular, the accumulation of peptide radiopharmaceuticals in the kidneys has been described and may cause dose-limiting renal toxicity (26). The observed high tumor–to–kidney uptake ratios for 177Lu-3BP-227 suggest that therapeutically effective doses of the radiopharmaceutical are unlikely to cause intolerable radiation damage to the kidneys.

Interestingly, tumor uptake of 177Lu-3B-227 appeared to be significantly higher than of its 111In-labeled analog (22) (e.g., P = 0.02 at 20 and 24 h after injection, respectively). This observation cannot be attributed to differences in affinity: the half maximal inhibitory concentration of both compounds has been determined to be similar in an in vitro functional calcium assay (5.35 nM for natIn- vs. 5.95 nM for natLu-3BP-227) as well as in a radioligand binding assay (0.76 nM for natIn- vs. 0.59 nM for natLu-3BP-227) (21). More likely the discrepancy in 177Lu- versus 111In-3BP-227 uptake in tumors as well as other tissues is due to variation in experimental parameters such as batch-to-batch variability of xenografts and administered mass dose, and a head-to-head comparison would be necessary to determine whether there are any true differences in the biodistribution of 3BP-227 labeled with different radiometals.

Administration of a single therapeutic dose of 177Lu-3BP-227 to HT29-xenografted mice led to statistically significant and persistent tumor growth inhibition with a distinct dose-dependent response. A more than 3-fold increase of tumor doubling time corresponding to a tumor growth delay of approximately 2 wk was observed for the 110-MBq group compared with controls. The antitumor effect was even more pronounced in the 165-MBq group, with a more than 7-fold increase in tumor doubling time and a tumor growth delay of more than 5 wk. So far, such a high degree of tumor growth inhibition has not been achieved with NTR1-targeted radiotherapeutics. Comparable studies investigating the antitumoral potential of NTR1-agonistic radioligands were performed using peptidic neurotensin analogs based on the biologically active sequence 8-13. García-Garayoa et al. examined the metabolically stabilized neurotensin derivative (NHis)Ac-Arg-(N-CH3)-Arg-Pro-Dmt-Tle-Leu (NT-XIX), the 99mTc-labeled version of which displayed a promising biodistribution pattern for theranostic applications, with tumor-to-kidney ratios of 1.9–2.7 between 1.5 and 24 h after injection (17). Labeled with 188Re, a significant inhibition of HT29 tumor growth by this peptide was shown in the first week after administration of the first fraction. In subsequent weeks, however, tumor growth did not differ significantly between therapy and control groups, resulting in only marginally increased tumor doubling times under 188Re-NT-XIX treatment. Maschauer et al. investigated the therapeutic efficacy of the 177Lu-labeled, metabolically stabilized neurotensin derivative NLys-Lys-Pro-Tyr-Tle-Leu (177Lu-NT127) (18). Compared with controls, a significant reduction of HT29 tumor volume of 50% was shown 4 wk after the application of a single dose of 50 MBq. However, relatively high tracer uptake in excretory organs was observed, leading to tumor-to-kidney ratios as low as 0.03–0.04 between 1 and 24 h after injection. This unspecific accumulation led to significant radiation-induced damage to liver and kidney tissues, hindering clinical translation of 177Lu-NT127-RLT.

In contrast to previously reported neurotensin derivatives, the medium-sized NTR1 antagonist 177Lu-3BP-227 elicits a promising therapeutic effect with a favorable biodistribution profile. In line with the observed biodistribution pattern showing low accumulation and absorbed radiation doses in excretory organs, there was no evidence of radiation-induced acute side effects to the kidneys after administration of 177Lu-3BP-227. Our dosimetry estimates show that even when administering a rather high cumulative patient dose of 50 GBq of 177Lu-3BP-227, the absorbed radiation dose for the kidneys should be only around 6 Gy, which is far below the postulated 23 Gy threshold for increased probability of developing severe late kidney damage. Although we have observed cross-reactivity of 3BP-227 with murine and human NTR1 (Christiane Smerling and Frank Osterkamp, unpublished data), under- or overestimation of renal damage in patients through extrapolation from the xenograft model is still possible because of potential species differences in NTR1 kidney expression or radiotracer pharmacokinetics. The observed reduction in body weight gain was only transient and not directly dose-dependent. Taken together, these results suggest that 177Lu-3BP-227, while having a statistically significant inhibitory effect on tumor growth, induces no overt signs of acute nephrotoxicity at the doses studied. However, radiation nephropathy has been observed to occur late (>6 mo) after RLT (27,28). Long-term toxicity as well as comprehensive dosimetry studies are needed to evaluate whether measures for kidney protection such as dose fractionation or coadministration of renoprotective agents are necessary in conjunction with 177Lu-3BP-227 therapy. Furthermore, considering the relatively high initial blood-pool activity of 177Lu-3BP-227, its hematotoxic safety profile needs to be assessed in future studies.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the therapeutic potential of 177Lu-labeled 3BP-227. 177Lu-3BP-227 inhibited HT29 tumor growth to a high degree and in a dose-dependent manner without significant acute toxic effects on normal tissues. The favorable properties for both patient stratification and RLT applications underline the high potential of 3BP-227 as a theranostic agent for clinical translation. Further preclinical evaluations, for example, evaluation in other tumor models as well as multidose, detailed dosimetry and toxicity studies, are currently ongoing and paving the way toward clinical studies of the therapeutic efficacy of 177Lu-3BP-227 in cancer patients.

DISCLOSURE

This work was supported by the KMU Innovativ program of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, principal investigator Christiane Smerling, grant no. 0315865) and the Foundation of German Business (SDW; Jörg Schulz). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ines Bodewald for her expert technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Mar. 2, 2017.

  • © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Reubi JC,
    2. Schär JC,
    3. Waser B,
    4. et al
    . Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1-SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:273–282.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Alonso-Gordoa T,
    2. Capdevila J,
    3. Grande E
    . GEP-NETs update: biotherapy for neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172:R31–R46.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Vincent JP,
    2. Mazella J,
    3. Kitabgi P
    . Neurotensin and neurotensin receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1999;20:302–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Johnson LR
    . Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Two Volume Set. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Science; 2012.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dupouy S,
    2. Viardot-Foucault V,
    3. Alifano M,
    4. et al
    . The neurotensin receptor-1 pathway contributes to human ductal breast cancer progression. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Gui X,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Meng Z,
    4. Gao Z
    . Neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1) overexpression in breast carcinomas is common and independent of ER/PR/Her2 expression. J Cancer Ther. 2013;4(7A):12–17.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.
    1. Gui X,
    2. Guzman G,
    3. Dobner PR,
    4. Kadkol SS
    . Increased neurotensin receptor-1 expression during progression of colonic adenocarcinoma. Peptides. 2008;29:1609–1615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Körner M,
    2. Waser B,
    3. Strobel O,
    4. Büchler M,
    5. Reubi JC
    . Neurotensin receptors in pancreatic ductal carcinomas. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Reubi JC,
    2. Waser B,
    3. Friess H,
    4. Büchler M,
    5. Laissue J
    . Neurotensin receptors: a new marker for human ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gut. 1998;42:546–550.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Reubi JC,
    2. Waser B,
    3. Schaer JC,
    4. Laissue JA
    . Neurotensin receptors in human neoplasms: high incidence in Ewing’s sarcomas. Int J Cancer. 1999;82:213–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Reubi JC,
    2. Waser B
    . Concomitant expression of several peptide receptors in neuroendocrine tumours: molecular basis for in vivo multireceptor tumour targeting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:781–793.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Reubi JC,
    2. Waser B,
    3. Maecke HR,
    4. Rivier JE
    . Highly increased 125I-JR11 antagonist binding in vitro reveals novel indications for sst2 targeting in human cancers. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:300–306.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Dash A,
    2. Chakraborty S,
    3. Pillai MR,
    4. Knapp FF Jr.
    . Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: an overview. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2015;30:47–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    1. Wild D,
    2. Fani M,
    3. Behe M,
    4. et al
    . First clinical evidence that imaging with somatostatin receptor antagonists is feasible. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1412–1417.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cescato R,
    2. Maina T,
    3. Nock B,
    4. et al
    . Bombesin receptor antagonists may be preferable to agonists for tumor targeting. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:318–326.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sleight AJ,
    2. Stam NJ,
    3. Mutel V,
    4. Vanderheyden PM
    . Radiolabelling of the human 5-HT2A receptor with an agonist, a partial agonist and an antagonist: effects on apparent agonist affinities. Biochem Pharmacol. 1996;51:71–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. García-Garayoa E,
    2. Bläuenstein P,
    3. Blanc A,
    4. Maes V,
    5. Tourwé D,
    6. Schubiger PA
    . A stable neurotensin-based radiopharmaceutical for targeted imaging and therapy of neurotensin receptor-positive tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:37–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Maschauer S,
    2. Ruckdeschel T,
    3. Tripal P,
    4. et al
    . In vivo monitoring of the antiangiogenic effect of neurotensin receptor-mediated radiotherapy by small-animal positron emission tomography: a pilot study. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2014;7:464–481.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gully D,
    2. Canton M,
    3. Boigegrain R,
    4. et al
    . Biochemical and pharmacological profile of a potent and selective nonpeptide antagonist of the neurotensin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:65–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gully D,
    2. Labeeuw B,
    3. Boigegrain R,
    4. et al
    . Biochemical and pharmacological activities of SR 142948A, a new potent neurotensin receptor antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;280:802–812.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Osterkamp F,
    2. Smerling C,
    3. Reineke U,
    4. Haase C,
    5. Ungewiss J
    , inventors; 3BP Pharmaceuticals GmbH, assignee. Neurotensin receptor ligands. European patent application EP20120008208. December 7, 2012.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Schulz J,
    2. Rohracker M,
    3. Stiebler M,
    4. et al
    . Comparative evaluation of the biodistribution profiles of a series of nonpeptidic neurotensin receptor-1 antagonists reveals a promising candidate for theranostic applications. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1120–1123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Vita N,
    2. Laurent P,
    3. Lefort S,
    4. et al
    . Cloning and expression of a complementary DNA encoding a high affinity human neurotensin receptor. FEBS Lett. 1993;317:139–142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Stabin MG,
    2. Sparks RB,
    3. Crowe E
    . OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–1027.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Souazé F,
    2. Dupouy S,
    3. Viardot-Foucault V,
    4. et al
    . Expression of neurotensin and NT1 receptor in human breast cancer: a potential role in tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6243–6249.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lambert B,
    2. Cybulla M,
    3. Weiner SM,
    4. et al
    . Renal toxicity after radionuclide therapy. Radiat Res. 2004;161:607–611.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Valkema R,
    2. Pauwels SA,
    3. Kvols LK,
    4. et al
    . Long-term follow-up of renal function after peptide receptor radiation therapy with 90Y-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)-octreotide and 177Lu-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)-octreotate. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(suppl 1):83S–91S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Rolleman EJ,
    2. Krenning EP,
    3. Bernard BF,
    4. et al
    . Long-term toxicity of [177Lu-DOTA (0),Tyr (3)]octreotate in rats. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:219–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication October 4, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication February 5, 2017.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 6
June 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Proof of Therapeutic Efficacy of a 177Lu-Labeled Neurotensin Receptor 1 Antagonist in a Colon Carcinoma Xenograft Model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Proof of Therapeutic Efficacy of a 177Lu-Labeled Neurotensin Receptor 1 Antagonist in a Colon Carcinoma Xenograft Model
Jörg Schulz, Martin Rohracker, Marvin Stiebler, Jürgen Goldschmidt, Franziska Stöber, Mercedes Noriega, Anette Pethe, Mathias Lukas, Frank Osterkamp, Ulrich Reineke, Aileen Höhne, Christiane Smerling, Holger Amthauer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2017, 58 (6) 936-941; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.185140

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Proof of Therapeutic Efficacy of a 177Lu-Labeled Neurotensin Receptor 1 Antagonist in a Colon Carcinoma Xenograft Model
Jörg Schulz, Martin Rohracker, Marvin Stiebler, Jürgen Goldschmidt, Franziska Stöber, Mercedes Noriega, Anette Pethe, Mathias Lukas, Frank Osterkamp, Ulrich Reineke, Aileen Höhne, Christiane Smerling, Holger Amthauer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2017, 58 (6) 936-941; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.185140
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • NTR Is the New SSTR? Perspective for Neurotensin Receptor 1 (NTR)–Directed Theranostics
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Synthesis of 64Cu-, 55Co-, and 68Ga-Labeled Radiopharmaceuticals Targeting Neurotensin Receptor-1 for Theranostics: Adjusting In Vivo Distribution Using Multiamine Macrocycles
  • Complexes of the neurotensin receptor 1 with small-molecule ligands reveal structural determinants of full, partial, and inverse agonism
  • Genetic signature of prostate cancer mouse models resistant to optimized hK2 targeted {alpha}-particle therapy
  • Mechanistic Biomarkers Informative of Both Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review
  • Genetic signature of prostate cancer resistant to optimized hK2 targeted alpha-particle therapy
  • Future of Theranostics: An Outlook on Precision Oncology in Nuclear Medicine
  • 177Lu-3BP-227 for Neurotensin Receptor 1-Targeted Therapy of Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: First Clinical Results
  • NTR Is the New SSTR? Perspective for Neurotensin Receptor 1 (NTR)-Directed Theranostics
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Determination of the Intralesional Distribution of Theranostic 124I-Omburtamab Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
  • 177Lu-Labeled Anticlaudin 6 Monoclonal Antibody for Targeted Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
Show more Theranostics

Basic

  • Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonist PET Tracer Development: Assessment in Nonhuman Primates
  • Optical Navigation of the Drop-In γ-Probe as a Means to Strengthen the Connection Between Robot-Assisted and Radioguided Surgery
  • Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of a 68Ga-Labeled Adnectin, 68Ga-BMS-986192, as a PET Agent for Imaging PD-L1 Expression
Show more Basic

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • NTR1 radiotracer
  • xenograft
  • SPECT/CT
  • theranostic
  • oncology
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire