Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Review ArticleContinuing Education

18F-FDG PET in Parkinsonism: Differential Diagnosis and Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment

Philipp T. Meyer, Lars Frings, Gerta Rücker and Sabine Hellwig
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2017, 58 (12) 1888-1898; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186403
Philipp T. Meyer
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Frings
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
2Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerta Rücker
3Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabine Hellwig
4Department of Psychiatry, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Accurate differential diagnosis of parkinsonism is of paramount therapeutic and prognostic importance. In addition, with the development of invasive therapies and novel disease-specific therapies, strategies for patient enrichment in trial populations are of growing importance. Imaging disease-specific patterns of regional glucose metabolism with PET and 18F-FDG allows for a highly accurate distinction between Parkinson disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonian syndromes, including multiple-system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration. On the basis of a preliminary metaanalysis of currently available studies with inclusion of multiple disease groups, we estimated that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for visual PET readings supported by voxel-based statistical analyses for diagnosis of atypical parkinsonian syndromes are 91.4% and 90.6%, respectively. The diagnostic specificity of 18F-FDG PET for diagnosing multiple-system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration was consistently shown to be high (>90%), whereas sensitivity was more variable (>75%). It is increasingly acknowledged that cognitive impairment represents a major challenge in PD, with mild cognitive impairment being a prodromal stage of PD with dementia (PDD). In line with clinical and neuropsychologic studies, recent PET studies demonstrated that posterior cortical dysfunction in nondemented PD patients precedes cognitive decline and the development of PDD by several years. Taken together, the current literature underscores the utility of 18F-FDG PET for diagnostic evaluation of parkinsonism and the promising role of 18F-FDG PET for assessment and risk stratification of cognitive impairment in PD.

  • FDG PET
  • Parkinson disease
  • multiple-system atrophy
  • progressive supranuclear palsy
  • corticobasal degeneration
  • mild cognitive impairment

Molecular neuroimaging using PET allows for quantitative visualization of functional and molecular processes in vivo. 18F-FDG is the most commonly used radiotracer for the assessment of regional cerebral glucose metabolism as a marker of neuronal function. By virtue of disclosing disease-specific alterations due to synaptic dysfunction, neuronal degeneration, and accompanying compensatory network changes, 18F-FDG PET has become an essential part in the diagnostic work-up of patients with neurodegenerative disorders, most notably dementia. Although disease-specific patterns of regional glucose metabolism in patients with parkinsonism have been known since the early days of PET imaging (1–3), the valuable role of 18F-FDG PET for differential diagnosis of parkinsonism has been increasingly acknowledged only in recent years. This interest was prompted by several promising studies from different research groups worldwide, particularly the group from the Feinstein Institute (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Overview and Preliminary Metaanalysis of Available Studies on Differential Diagnosis of Parkinsonism by 18F-FDG PET, Including Multiple Disease Groups (Group of APSs as Target Condition; i.e., Positive Case)

Against this background, this clinically oriented review on the use of 18F-FDG PET in neurodegenerative parkinsonism provides the clinical practitioner with an update on the clinical demand and rationale for 18F-FDG PET imaging in parkinsonism, typical 18F-FDG PET patterns and their value for differential diagnosis of parkinsonism (including a preliminary metaanalysis of recent studies), and an outlook on the promising role of 18F-FDG PET for diagnostic assessment and risk stratification in cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease (PD).

CLINICAL DEMAND AND RATIONALE FOR 18F-FDG PET IMAGING IN PARKINSONISM

PD

The clinical diagnosis of PD, as the most common neurodegenerative cause of parkinsonism, relies on the presence of the cardinal motor manifestations: bradykinesia, resting tremor, and rigidity. A clear response to dopaminergic therapy and the presence of either olfactory loss or cardiac sympathetic denervation are supportive criteria (4). Moreover, diagnosis of clinically established PD requires absence of the features of atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APSs).

The histopathologic hallmark of PD is the so-called Lewy pathology (i.e., α-synuclein immunoreactive neuronal inclusions) (5). Intracerebral Lewy pathology starts at clearly defined induction sites and advances in a topographically predictable sequence affecting the brain stem, subcortical nuclei, and neocortex (6). Consequently, loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic projection neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (5) is primarily responsible for the development of typical motor symptoms. Cortical spread of Lewy pathology in addition to concomitant, possibly synergistic pathologies (e.g., Alzheimer-type pathology) and distant effects via disruption of modulatory projections from noradrenergic, serotonergic, dopaminergic, and cholinergic brain stem and basal forebrain nuclei contributes to cognitive decline, ranging from PD with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) to PD with dementia (7). Although controversial, the so-called 1-y rule (i.e., the diagnosis is PD with dementia (PDD) if the onset of dementia occurs more than 1 y after the onset of parkinsonism) (8) is used by clinicians to distinguish dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) from PDD. The continuum of PD, PD-MCI, PDD, and DLB is often referred to as the spectrum of Lewy body disorders (9).

APSs

The APSs comprise multiple-system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD), which are a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by levodopa-refractory parkinsonism and distinctive atypical clinical features (10). In cases of MSA, one may observe various combinations of progressive autonomic failure, parkinsonian, cerebellar features, and pyramidal features. MSA is classified as of the parkinsonian subtype (MSA-P) if parkinsonism is the most prominent feature and as of the cerebellar subtype (MSA-C) if cerebellar ataxia predominates (11). MSA is defined as a primary oligodendroglial α-synucleinopathy with consecutive neuronal degeneration (11). MSA pathology most severely affects the substantia nigra, caudate, putamen, cerebellar white matter, pontine nuclei, inferior olivary nucleus, and medullary tegmentum (12).

The 4-repeat tauopathies PSP and CBD may be considered to represent different manifestations of a disease spectrum with several common clinical, pathologic, genetic, and biochemical features (13). In cases of PSP, recent Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria propose 4 core functional domains—ocular motor dysfunction, postural instability, akinesia, and cognitive dysfunction—as characteristic clinical manifestations (14). Several clinical PSP presentations have been defined, with the combination of early-onset postural instability and falls with vertical ocular motor dysfunction representing the most frequent presentation (the so-called Richardson syndrome). Of particular relevance for the present context are also PSP presentations with prominent parkinsonism resembling PD (possibly including tremor and response to levodopa) and a corticobasal syndrome (14). PSP is histopathologically defined by intracerebral aggregation of the microtubule-associated protein tau, predominantly involving isoforms with 4 microtubule-binding repeats, in neurofibrillary tangles, oligodendrocytic coils, and, specifically, astrocytic tufts (14). Albeit heterogeneity in the distribution of tau pathology in PSP has to be recognized (reflecting clinical diversity), globus pallidus, subthalamic nucleus, and substantia nigra are consistently the regions most severely affected, whereas less tau immunoreactivity is detected in the posterior frontal cortex (15).

On the basis of autopsy-confirmed cases, 4 clinical phenotypes associated with CBD pathology have been proposed (16). The corticobasal syndrome phenotype, as the most frequent, prototypical variant, is characterized by an asymmetric presentation of limb rigidity or akinesia; limb dystonia or myoclonus; oro-buccal or limb apraxia; cortical sensory deficit; or alien limb phenomenon (16). Like PSP, CBD may also cause a frontal behavioral syndrome, primary progressive aphasia, and even a PSP-like syndrome. CBD is also characterized by widespread deposition of hyperphosphorylated 4-repeat tau in neurons and glia, the latter as astrocytic plaques. Strategic regions severely affected by CBD are the superior frontal gyrus, motor cortex, and substantia nigra (5).

Treatment and Prognosis

Clinicopathologic studies suggest that the clinical diagnosis of PD is inaccurate in about 20%–25% of patients (17,18). APSs are frequently misdiagnosed as PD. Even at advanced stages, when patients present with distinctive clinical features, a relevant fraction of patients with MSA and PSP (∼30%) and, particularly, CBD (≤74%) receive an incorrect diagnosis (19). The limited accuracy represents a major obstacle for treatment selection and reliable prognostic counseling: for PD, functional reconstitution of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway is essential. Dopaminergic drugs alleviate both motor symptoms and (to some extent) nonmotor symptoms and improve quality of life (20). Trials investigating possible neuroprotective agents have supported, although not proven, disease-modifying effects of dopaminergics in PD (21). Given that common side effects (i.e., psychosis, orthostatic hypotension, and gastrointestinal disorders) may substantially compromise the clinical condition, reliable treatment-predictive biomarkers and diagnoses are desirable. Moreover, unnecessary treatment costs need to be avoided. For the management of advanced PD (when intractable levodopa-induced motor complications develop) invasive techniques, including deep-brain stimulation, stereotactic neurosurgery or other ablative treatments, and subcutaneous apomorphine therapy or intraduodenal levodopa infusion, are available (22,23). Experimental therapies have tried to restore striatal dopamine in PD patients by gene-based and cell-based approaches. Aside from ethical considerations and logistic challenges, data concerning the use of human fetal ventral mesencephalic allografts in PD are controversial (24,25).

The current focus of drug therapy for APSs is still primarily alleviation of symptoms, for which the therapy is often ineffective (10). Available data on interventional therapies in APSs are sparse: small case series highlight the risk of clinical worsening after deep-brain stimulation in histologically proven MSA patients and strongly discourage its use (26). In line with this finding, another case report revealed rapid post-thalamotomy deterioration in a patient who received a postmortem diagnosis of CBD (27). At present, no effective treatment exists to delay disease progression in APSs. In turn, disease-modifying trials with rasagiline and rifampicin for MSA or tideglusib and davunetide for PSP yielded negative results (10). Strategies to enhance trial success have been proposed, such as an enrichment design for novel disease-specific molecularly targeted therapeutics or identification of preclinical stages of parkinsonism, allowing for primary prevention and early disease-modifying trials. Most recently, several immunotherapeutic approaches to modify clearance, aggregation, and transport of α-synuclein (28) and tau (29) have been explored.

Survival is distinctly better in PD than in APSs: although some population-based studies did not find higher mortality (30), others convincingly demonstrated an increased age-adjusted mortality in PD (31). A higher age at onset, as in APSs, is also associated with a higher PD mortality (32), but median survival was still 10.3 y in a recent population-based cohort with a high average age of 70 y at diagnosis (30). However, development of PDD is associated with a strong increase in mortality (33). In fact, the mean time span between onset of dementia and death appears to be only about 2–4 y (33,34). Compared with PD, APSs are characterized by the early presence of additional debilitating symptoms and a more rapid progression to death (10). According to clinicopathologic studies, APSs share a comparably short survival of about 7–8 y from symptom onset, or less than 3–4 y from the typically somewhat delayed clinical diagnosis (32).

Taken together, accurate diagnosis of the underlying cause of parkinsonism is required for decisions on treatment strategies (including invasive techniques), inclusion in therapy trials (e.g., enrichment of patient populations for novel therapies), and prognostic statements.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF PARKINSONISM

In our opinion and as practiced by many centers, 18F-FDG PET may be used for differential diagnosis of parkinsonism when there remains substantial uncertainty about the underlying cause of parkinsonism after comprehensive evaluation by a movement disorder specialist and when the result of the examination is expected to alter patient management (e.g., ordering further diagnostic tests, medication, other treatments, and patient counseling). This view is strengthened by a larger prospective study supporting American Academy of Neurology level I evidence for 18F-FDG PET as a test for APS differential diagnosis (35,36) and the present metaanalysis.

The preceding diagnostic work-up usually includes MRI, which may provide valuable diagnostic findings in secondary parkinsonism (e.g., vascular parkinsonism) and in APSs with relatively high specificity but low sensitivity (particularly in early disease stages) (37). In our experience, it is neither necessary nor effective in terms of costs and radiation burden to always verify beforehand a neurodegenerative cause of parkinsonism by imaging of nigrostriatal integrity (e.g., with 123I-FP-CIT [N-(3-fluoropropyl)-2β-carbon ethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane] SPECT), because an 18F-FDG PET scan in patients with suspected APSs often provides typical findings that render additional imaging of nigrostriatal integrity dispensable. Technical aspects of 18F-FDG PET brain imaging (e.g., patient preparation, data acquisition, and image interpretation) have been presented in respective procedure guidelines (38,39).

Disease-Specific Patterns of Regional Glucose Metabolism

Disease-specific patterns of altered cerebral glucose metabolism used for differential diagnosis of PD and APS subgroups (35,40–42) are schematically illustrated in Figure 1. Furthermore, transaxial 18F-FDG PET images and outputs of currently used image analysis methods are depicted in Figure 2.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Summary and schematic illustration of typical clinical findings and disease-specific metabolic patterns yielded by 18F-FDG PET in parkinsonism. Green regions show relative hypermetabolism, red regions exhibit hypometabolism, and orange regions indicate possible metabolic decreases in PD (especially in patients with cognitive impairment). Shown are lateral (left) and medial (right) views of brain. Hypometabolism in CBD is usually markedly asymmetric, with lower metabolism contralateral to the clinically more affected body side. ctx = cortex; DEC = decrease; INC = increase. MSA-P and MSA-C = multiple-system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism and cerebellar symptoms, respectively; PS = parkinsonian syndrome.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Typical 18F-FDG PET findings in individual patients with parkinsonism as depicted by the currently used image analysis methods. First panel shows spatially normalized transaxial 18F-FDG PET cross-sections at levels of cerebellum, basal ganglia, and dorsal frontoparietal cortex. Datasets were threshold-constrained for optimal display. Second panel shows individual results of voxelwise statistical analysis with NeuroSTAT/3D-SSP. Shown are lateral and medial views of brain. Metabolic deficits compared with age-matched control subjects are color-coded as z scores. Third panel shows individual results of voxelwise statistical analysis with SPM. Shown are t maps in comparison to age-matched control subjects overlaid on SPM MRI template. Metabolic decreases (blue color-scale) and increases (hot metal color-scale) were constrained to threshold at voxelwise P level of less than 0.01 and cluster extent of more than 50 voxels. Fourth panel shows z scores (relative to healthy controls) of metabolic covariance network expression for PD-related pattern, MSA-related pattern, PSP-related pattern, and CBD-related pattern (PDRP, MSARP, PSPRP, and CBDRP, respectively). Network showing highest expression (encircled) always matched reference diagnosis. Expression scores for PD-related cognitive pattern were 0.7 in patient with PD Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage II without MCI and 2.6 in patient with PD H&Y IV with MCI.

Scans of PD patients often show no major abnormality at first glance. On closer inspection and especially on voxel-based statistical analyses, PD is characterized by a posterior temporoparietal, occipital, and sometimes frontal hypometabolism (especially in PD with cognitive impairment) and relative hypermetabolism of the putamen, pallidum, thalamus sensorimotor cortex, pons, and cerebellum.

Conversely, MSA patients show a marked hypometabolism of the (posterior) putamen, pons, and cerebellum, which may be more pronounced in the striatum or in the pons and cerebellum, depending on the predominant side of degeneration and, thus, clinical presentation (striatonigral/MSA-P and olivopontocerebellar/MSA-C, respectively) (43). An isolated cerebellar hypometabolism may also occur in other causes of cerebellar degeneration (e.g., paraneoplastic or spinocerebellar ataxia). Group analyses demonstrated also a frontal hypometabolism that may spread to parietal and temporal areas simultaneously with the onset of cognitive impairment (44). The latter finding, however, is less apparent in individual analyses and of little help for differential diagnosis by 18F-FDG PET.

In the case of PSP, regional hypometabolism is consistently noted in the medial, dorsal, and ventrolateral frontal areas (i.e., the anterior cingulate gyrus, supplementary motor area, precentral gyrus, and premotor–to–posterior prefrontal areas); caudate; thalamus; and upper brain stem. These findings have also been confirmed in a recent study with postmortem verification (45). The recently proposed Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria for PSP set a framework for the diagnosis of several PSP predominance types (14), which can be expected to also differ on 18F-FDG PET. For example, the aforementioned functional domains have been linked to predominant bilateral regional hypometabolism of the anterior cingulate gyrus (vertical gaze palsy (46)), thalamus (repeated unprovoked falls (47)), midbrain (gait freezing (48)), and left medial and dorsolateral frontal lobe (nonfluent aphasia (49)).

Finally, CBD is characterized by a usually highly asymmetric hypometabolism of the frontoparietal areas, striatum, and thalamus contralateral to the most affected body side. Cortical hypometabolism may be pronounced in the parietal cortex and usually extends across the sensorimotor cortex into the cingulate gyrus and premotor–to–posterior prefrontal areas.

A corticobasal syndrome may also be caused by several diseases other than CBD, most notably Alzheimer disease and PSP. Consequently, the clinical diagnosis of CBD is notoriously inaccurate: only about 25%–50% of patients with a corticobasal syndrome are found to have CBD on postmortem examination, whereas only 25%–30% of patients with neuropathologically verified CBD present with a corticobasal syndrome (19,50). Likewise, imaging results in patients with clinically diagnosed PSP and CBD may be very similar. In direct comparison of clinically defined patient groups, PSP patients showed a lower metabolism in the midbrain, thalamus, and cingulate gyrus, whereas CBD patients revealed a more pronounced and asymmetric hypometabolism in the parietal and sensorimotor cortex and striatum (51–54). According to recent studies with support by postmortem data, parietal involvement and the asymmetry of the aforementioned frontoparietal hypometabolism appear to be most characteristic of CBD (45,55). However, asymmetric hypometabolism on 18F-FDG PET may also be encountered in PSP (Fig. 2), with an asymmetric PSP presentation being related to an asymmetric metabolism in the motor cortex, cingulate gyrus, and thalamus (51). Finally, a recent study suggested that more prominent temporoparietal than frontal hypometabolism points toward an underlying Alzheimer pathology in patients with corticobasal syndrome, as confirmed by amyloid PET and pathology in roughly two thirds of these cases (56).

The aforementioned results were gained mostly from categoric comparisons. However, they fit the results gained from spatial covariance analyses, which were used to detect abnormal metabolic networks in PD, MSA, PSP, and CBD. These disease-related patterns (i.e., PD-, MSA-, PSP-, and CBD-related patterns) (Fig. 3) were demonstrated to be highly reproducible, to correlate with disease severity and duration (albeit to a variable extent in PD, MSA, and PSP), and to allow for prospective discrimination between cohorts (55,57–60). Furthermore, these patterns were confirmed by several independent groups relying on different patient populations and equipment (61–63). Expression of the PD-related pattern inversely correlates with striatal dopaminergic integrity (as assessed by 6-18F-fluoro-l-dopa PET) (64) and is already significantly increased in the ipsilateral (presymptomatic) hemisphere of patients with hemiparkinsonism (65). Likewise, recent studies demonstrated that expression of the PD-related pattern is also increased in the rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder (66,67), being a significant predictor of phenoconversion to PD or DLB (assessed with perfusion SPECT (66)). In parallel to the respective metabolic changes (i.e., decrease in putamen/pallidum, sensorimotor cortex, and cerebellum; increase in precuneus) and symptom improvement, expression of the PD-related pattern was also found to decline with levodopa administration and deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in PD (68). Thus, covariance patterns of cerebral glucose metabolism represent interesting, observer-independent biomarkers for early diagnosis and therapy monitoring.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Disease-related metabolic covariance patterns: PD-related (A), MSA-related (B), PSP-related (C), and CBD-related (D). Metabolic increases and decreases are color-coded in blue and red, respectively; voxel loadings are z-scored. CBD-related pattern is usually markedly asymmetric (i.e., higher contralateral to clinically more affected body side). (Reprinted with permission of (58).)

Diagnostic Value: Preliminary Metaanalysis

Several larger, in part prospective studies investigated the applicability of 18F-FDG PET for the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. Given the paucity of disease-specific treatments for APS subtypes, distinguishing PD from APSs (as an umbrella diagnosis) is of major therapeutic and prognostic relevance. To better characterize the value of 18F-FDG PET for diagnosis of APSs (as the target condition—i.e., positive case—as opposed to PD) and to compare the analysis methods used so far, we conducted a preliminary metaanalysis, which is described in the supplemental materials (available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org).

Table 1 summarizes the results of currently available studies and the resulting metaanalyses. PET image analyses can be divided into 2 major approaches (Fig. 2). (A review of image analysis methods was recently published by Meles et al. (69).) Five studies (35,40,41,70,71) used observer-dependent visual reads supported by voxel-based statistical analyses in comparison to healthy control subjects (done by statistical parametric mapping [SPM; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/] or NeuroSTAT/3D-SSP [https://neurostat.neuro.utah.edu/]) (72). Three studies used observer-independent automated statistical classifications of patients with parkinsonism that applied logistic regression based on the expression of metabolic covariance patterns (42,73) or a relevance vector machine in combination with bootstrap resampling for nonhierarchic multiclass classification (74).

Most studies found 18F-FDG PET to be highly accurate (>90%) at distinguishing between APSs and PD. Figure 4 gives the summary receiver-operating-characteristic curves for the 2 analysis approaches used. The estimated pooled sensitivity of observer-dependent visual reads supported by voxel-based statistical analyses was significantly higher than the pooled sensitivity of observer-independent automated classifications (91.4% vs. 76.5%; P < 0.01), whereas the pooled specificity was slightly, though not significantly, higher for the automated analyses (94.7% vs. 90.6%; Table 1).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Summary receiver-operating-characteristic curves for differentiation between PD and APSs by 18F-FDG PET (APSs as target condition; i.e., positive case). Green and red lines represent summary receiver-operating-characteristic curves of observer-dependent visual reads supported by, respectively, voxel-based statistical analyses (methods 1.1 and 1.2 in Table 1; area under curve, 0.96 [95% confidence interval, 0.94–0.98]) and observer-independent automated classifications (methods 2.1 and 2.2 in Table 1; area under curve, 0.94 [0.90–0.97]).

Various factors might influence the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET. However, current studies support the robustness of the method: exploring the effect of disease duration on classification accuracy, Eckert et al. (40) showed that agreement with the final clinical diagnosis was slightly higher for patients with early-stage PD (disease duration < 5 y) than for those with late-stage PD (98% vs. 92%) when using SPM-supported readings, but not for visual readings alone (88% vs. 97%). In the studies by Hellwig et al. (35) and Tripathi et al. (73), no difference was observed for distinguishing between PD and APSs when stratifying by disease duration (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve ≥ 0.93), whereas in the study by Tang et al. (42), diagnostic sensitivity was somewhat higher in patients with a longer disease duration (≥2 y) than in those with a shorter disease duration (APSs, 87% vs. 72%; PD, 88% vs. 77%).

Interestingly, in the latter study, diagnostic performance increased with longer clinical follow-up (≥2 y), suggesting that the apparent lower performance of imaging classification in patients with short follow-up (<2 y) is probably caused by initial clinical uncertainty, not incorrect imaging diagnosis (42).

In the study by Hellwig et al. (35), 11 of 34 patients belonging to the spectrum of Lewy body disorders received a final diagnosis of PDD or DLB after follow-up. Exclusion of these patients did not affect the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, 0.93 vs. 0.94 before vs. after exclusion of PDD/DLB).

Given the aforementioned effects of treatment on regional metabolism and metabolic network expression, it may be advisable to scan patients in the off-medication state. However, a study comparing the diagnostic performance of the PD-related pattern in distinguishing between healthy controls and PD patients in the off-medication and on-medication states showed no major impact (62), and the effect of medication on regional metabolism in patients with APSs is unknown. The studies summarized in Table 1 were done under both conditions, without apparent impact.

The notably higher sensitivity of observer-dependent visual reads supported by voxel-based statistical analyses may represent an advantage over observer-independent automated analyses. In turn, observer dependence may be a disadvantage if expertise is limited. However, Eckert et al. (40) demonstrated that nonexpert investigators using SPM-supported reads performed better (92% accuracy) than experts using visual reads alone (85%), whereas in the study by Tripathi et al. (71), 2 experts performed comparably with (91%) and without (92%) using SPM-supported reads. Since NeuroSTAT/3D-SSP does not cover the striatum, SPM might be preferable, especially if reads are performed by nonexperts. The current automated method based on disease-specific network expression is limited with regard to cases classified as “indeterminate parkinsonism,” which accounted for 14% and 19% of patients in 2 studies (42,73). This issue seems to limit sensitivity for early APSs (73) and may also become more relevant if patients with severe structural abnormalities or alternative diagnosis are included.

Aside from multiclass relevance vector machine analysis (74), the specificity of the PET diagnoses for the APS subgroups MSA, PSP, and CBD usually exceeded 90% (as requested for a confirmatory test), whereas sensitivity was 77%–96% for MSA, 74%–100% for PSP, and 75%–91% for CBD (35,40–42,70,71,73). Such subgroup classifications will be important for patient enrichment in future trials with disease- or pathology-specific treatments. However, given the clinical and imaging ambiguity in the case of PSP and CBD, it may be advisable to use a combined PSP/CBD tauopathy category for PET readings, which reaches a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 100%, respectively (35).

Finally, a recent study investigated the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET in parkinsonism (32). Using a follow-up of up to 6 y (median survival duration: PD, not reached; APSs, 4.1 y after PET), risk stratification concerning overall survival yielded by PET was at least as good as that provided by the clinical diagnosis filed 1 y after PET (age-adjusted hazard ratios relative to PD for PET: PSP/CBD, 5.2, and MSA, 5.6; for clinical diagnosis: PSP/CBD, 4.5, and MSA, not significant). That study highlighted for the first time the prognostic relevance of 18F-FDG PET, which is of particular importance not only for the patients but also for their relatives and caregivers.

OUTLOOK

Cognitive Impairment in PD

The onset of cognitive impairment in PD, by the definition given earlier, follows the onset of motor symptoms (8), and both the diagnosis of PDD and the diagnosis of PD-MCI require an established PD diagnosis (75,76). Cognitive impairment is frequent in PD, with up to 80% of all patients developing dementia over the long term (77,78). The putative prodromal stage of PDD—PD-MCI (requiring functional independence, in contrast to PDD, in which activities of daily living are impaired)—is common in nondemented patients with PD (cross-sectional prevalence of 27% (79)). In a population-based study, 20% of incident PD cases had PD-MCI, and another 20% developed PD-MCI over the 5-y study period. PD-MCI was a major risk factor for PDD, with an annual conversion rate of 13% (79), which is similar to the rate of conversion for MCI (without PD) to Alzheimer dementia (80). However, a significant proportion of patients who had PD-MCI also reverted to normal cognition in that study (25% over 5 y (79)).

The spatial distribution of Lewy-related pathology contributes to the type of predominant cognitive deficit in a given patient, and the most affected cognitive domains in PD are the executive, visuospatial, attention, and memory functions (76,81). The diagnosis of PD-MCI requires objective cognitive impairment, at least on a scale of global cognitive abilities (level 1 (76)). However, greater diagnostic certainty and sensitivity is achieved with at least 2 neuropsychologic tests probing each of the 4 cognitive domains mentioned above plus the language domain (level 2 (76)). Although the current diagnostic criteria for PD-MCI recommend formal neuropsychologic testing across a range of cognitive domains, it might be especially efficient to focus on visuospatial abilities or semantic fluency, as there is emerging evidence of a dual cognitive syndrome in PD (82,83): a frontostriatal syndrome and a posterior cortical syndrome. These syndromes are presumably independent but frequently occur together. The cognitive deficits associated with the frontostriatal syndrome typically involve phonemic verbal fluency and other executive functions, such as flexibility or planning abilities. By contrast, figure drawing, but also semantic verbal fluency or episodic memory, are involved in the posterior cortical syndrome. Importantly, the risk for developing dementia is not associated with the frontostriatal syndrome but is significantly increased in the presence of the posterior cortical syndrome (83), thereby having special prognostic value. Whereas disturbance of the dopaminergic transmitter system (from degeneration of the substantia nigra pars compacta) presumably underlies the frontostriatal syndrome, altered cholinergic transmission (from degeneration of the nucleus basalis of Meynert) is primarily associated with the posterior cortical syndrome (81). Consistently, a recent metaanalysis provided strong evidence for the efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine) in the treatment of cognitive (and psychiatric) symptoms in PDD/DLB (84).

Because of the high prevalence and clinical importance of cognitive impairment in PD, valid biomarkers for risk stratification are wanted.

18F-FDG PET Imaging of Cognitive Impairment in PD

Interestingly, cortical hypometabolism, particularly in the posterior temporoparietal and occipital areas, is frequently observed in nondemented PD patients (Figs. 1 and 2). These changes often match the changes seen in PDD and also DLB, thus raising the question of whether they predict cognitive decline in PD.

Both PDD and DLB are characterized by a widespread lateral frontal and temporoparietal hypometabolism in addition to an occipital hypometabolism, which distinguishes PDD and DLB from Alzheimer dementia (85,86). In turn, metabolic differences between PDD and DLB, if any, appear to be subtle (87). The widespread involvement of cortical and subcortical areas in the spectrum of Lewy body disease was also demonstrated by studies showing an extensive positive correlation between results on the mini-mental status examination and regional glucose metabolism in the lateral parietal, occipital, temporal, and frontal association cortices; anterior cingulate; precuneus; and caudate nucleus across the spectrum of PD to PDD (88,89).

Consequently, spatial covariance analyses were found to be sensitive enough to identify a PD-related cognitive pattern even in nondemented patients. The pattern is characterized by metabolic decreases in the rostral supplementary motor area, dorsal premotor area, prefrontal cortex, precuneus, and parietal cortex and increases in the cerebellar vermis and dentate nucleus (90). A PD-related cognitive pattern was found to be reproducible across institutions and patient populations (minor differences, such as regarding the caudate nucleus and anterior cingulate, may stem from different tests), to correlate with executive and memory performance, and to be increased in PD-MCI compared with cognitively unimpaired PD patients (90–92). Despite its spatial overlap with the PD-related pattern, PD-related cognitive pattern is orthogonal to the PD-related pattern and does not correlate with the severity of motor impairment (90,93). Expression of the PD-related cognitive pattern seems to correlate with nigrostriatal dopaminergic dysfunction of the caudate nucleus (64,94) and with levodopa-induced improvement in verbal learning in a subgroup of PD patients without dementia (95). Thus, assessing expression of PD-related cognitive pattern may be a valuable tool for objectifying and monitoring cognitive dysfunction in PD. Future studies need to explore the predictive value of PD-related cognitive pattern for cognitive decline in PD-MCI in comparison to more specific posterior cortical measures, given the particular prognostic value of the posterior cortical syndrome.

The results of several longitudinal studies investigating cognitive decline and regional metabolism in PD have recently become available: In a seminal work, Bohnen et al. (96) demonstrated that conversion from PD to PDD was heralded by significant hypometabolism in the posterior cingulate, occipital cortex (Brodmann area 18/19), and caudate nucleus. Hypometabolism in the primary visual cortex (Brodmann area 17) was also observed in cognitively stable PD patients. Metabolic decline was widespread in converters on 2-y follow-up PET, involving the association cortices, posterior cingulate, hippocampus, and thalamus. Subsequent studies on nondemented PD patients confirmed these results, showing that bilateral hypometabolism in the precuneus and lateral posterior temporoparietal and occipital regions at baseline predicted cognitive decline in the following 3 y (97–99). These findings agree with earlier cross-sectional studies (87,100).

PET studies on PD-MCI patients support the notion that PD-MCI represents a prodromal stage of PDD, especially in those with posterior cortical hypometabolism. Patients with MCI typically exhibit decreased temporoparietal, occipital, precuneal, and frontal metabolism when compared with healthy controls and, to a lesser extent, PD patients without MCI (88,91,98,101,102). These changes were more pronounced in multidomain than single-domain MCI (91,102). Recent studies using the current diagnostic criteria for PD-MCI demonstrated that the overall pattern of hypometabolism gradually develops from smaller clusters of mainly parietal and occipital (and sometimes frontal) hypometabolism in cognitively normal PD patients, to more widespread parietal, occipital, frontal, and (to a lesser extent) posterior temporal clusters in PD-MCI, and then to extensive parietal, occipital, frontal, and temporal hypometabolism in PDD (88,98,103). Interestingly, hypometabolism on 18F-FDG PET preceded spatially matching atrophic changes on MRI (103). Across the entire group of patients with PD, PD-MCI, or PDD, regional glucose metabolism correlated with memory and visuospatial functions in the posterior temporal and parietal regions and also with attentional, executive, and language functions in the frontal regions (88,98). Several additional clinical observations support the strong negative prognostic value of posterior cortical hypometabolism. For example, recent longitudinal studies demonstrated that visual hallucinations and hyposmia, which coincided with a marked temporoparietal and occipital hypometabolism in PD (with or without MCI), were associated with an increased conversion to PDD (104,105). Likewise, PD patients with the rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder showed lower cognitive performance and a higher likelihood of MCI and posterior cortical hypometabolism than did PD patient without this disorder (106). Finally, the aforementioned long-term follow-up study (32) found that patients with posterior cortical hypometabolism exhibited twice the mortality risk of PD patients without such a pattern.

Taken together, these findings indicate that posterior cortical hypometabolism has an importance of which the nuclear medicine practitioner should be aware. Although it is probably premature to propose clinical use of posterior cortical hypometabolism as a predictor of cognitive decline in PD, this finding may prompt further examinations and special consideration under specific circumstances (e.g., counseling of patients with PD-MCI or before initiating invasive therapies such as deep-brain stimulation).

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET allows for accurate differentiation between PD and APSs, which is of paramount therapeutic and prognostic importance. Furthermore, 18F-FDG PET provides a highly specific differential diagnosis between the APS subtypes MSA, PSP, and CBD. However, given the limited accuracy of the clinical diagnosis as the reference standard, future studies with postmortem verification are needed to validate the diagnostic imaging patterns, particularly in tauopathies.

Current 18F-FDG PET studies strongly support the concept that PD-MCI represents a prodromal stage of PDD. These studies underline that posterior cortical hypometabolism in nondemented PD patients is not only a diagnostically useful epiphenomenon but also a negative prognostic marker. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET.

Acknowledgments

Regarding Figure 2, we thank Drs. Yilong Ma and David Eidelberg of the Center for Neurosciences, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, for providing the analyses of disease-specific metabolic network expression.

Footnotes

  • Published online Sep. 14, 2017.

  • Learning Objectives: On successful completion of this activity, participants should be able to (1) describe the clinical demand and rationale for differential diagnosis in parkinsonism, (2) recognize and differentiate the disease-specific patterns of regional glucose metabolism associated with Parkinson disease and the different atypical parkinsonian syndromes, and (3) identify regional metabolic changes that predict cognitive decline in Parkinson disease.

  • Financial Disclosure: Dr. Meyer receives support from GE and Piramal for a research study outside the present topic. The authors of this article have indicated no other relevant relationships that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest.

  • CME Credit: SNMMI is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to sponsor continuing education for physicians. SNMMI designates each JNM continuing education article for a maximum of 2.0 AMA PRA category 1 credits. Physicians should claim only credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. For CE credit, SAM, and other credit types, participants can access this activity through the SNMMI website (http://www.snmmilearningcenter.org) through December 2020.

  • © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. D’Antona R,
    2. Baron JC,
    3. Samson Y,
    4. et al
    . Subcortical dementia: frontal cortex hypometabolism detected by positron tomography in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain. 1985;108:785–799.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Eidelberg D,
    2. Dhawan V,
    3. Moeller JR,
    4. et al
    . The metabolic landscape of cortico-basal ganglionic degeneration: regional asymmetries studied with positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54:856–862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kuhl DE
    . Imaging local brain function with emission computed tomography. Radiology. 1984;150:625–631.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Postuma RB,
    2. Berg D,
    3. Stern M,
    4. et al
    . MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1591–1601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dickson DW
    . Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism: neuropathology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a009258.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Braak H,
    2. Ghebremedhin E,
    3. Rub U,
    4. Bratzke H,
    5. Del Tredici K
    . Stages in the development of Parkinson’s disease-related pathology. Cell Tissue Res. 2004;318:121–134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Aarsland D,
    2. Creese B,
    3. Politis M,
    4. et al
    . Cognitive decline in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13:217–231.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. McKeith IG,
    2. Dickson DW,
    3. Lowe J,
    4. et al
    . Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2005;65:1863–1872.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lippa CF,
    2. Duda JE,
    3. Grossman M,
    4. et al
    . DLB and PDD boundary issues: diagnosis, treatment, molecular pathology, and biomarkers. Neurology. 2007;68:812–819.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Eschlböck S,
    2. Krismer F,
    3. Wenning GK
    . Interventional trials in atypical parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22(suppl 1):S82–S92.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fanciulli A,
    2. Wenning GK
    . Multiple-system atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:249–263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Jellinger KA
    . Neuropathology of multiple system atrophy: new thoughts about pathogenesis. Mov Disord. 2014;29:1720–1741.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kouri N,
    2. Whitwell JL,
    3. Josephs KA,
    4. Rademakers R,
    5. Dickson DW
    . Corticobasal degeneration: a pathologically distinct 4R tauopathy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7:263–272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Höglinger GU,
    2. Respondek G,
    3. Stamelou M,
    4. et al
    . Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: the Movement Disorder Society criteria. Mov Disord. 2017;32:853–864.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Williams DR,
    2. Holton JL,
    3. Strand C,
    4. et al
    . Pathological tau burden and distribution distinguishes progressive supranuclear palsy-parkinsonism from Richardson’s syndrome. Brain. 2007;130:1566–1576.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Armstrong MJ,
    2. Litvan I,
    3. Lang AE,
    4. et al
    . Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology. 2013;80:496–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rizzo G,
    2. Copetti M,
    3. Arcuti S,
    4. Martino D,
    5. Fontana A,
    6. Logroscino G
    . Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016;86:566–576.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Tolosa E,
    2. Wenning G,
    3. Poewe W
    . The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:75–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ling H,
    2. O’Sullivan SS,
    3. Holton JL,
    4. et al
    . Does corticobasal degeneration exist? A clinicopathological re-evaluation. Brain. 2010;133:2045–2057.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Stowe R,
    2. Ives N,
    3. Clarke CE,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant treatment to levodopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease patients with motor complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(7):CD007166.
  21. 21.↵
    1. de la Fuente-Fernández R,
    2. Schulzer M,
    3. Mak E,
    4. Sossi V
    . Trials of neuroprotective therapies for Parkinson’s disease: problems and limitations. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010;16:365–369.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Krack P,
    2. Martinez-Fernandez R,
    3. Del Alamo M,
    4. Obeso JA
    . Current applications and limitations of surgical treatments for movement disorders. Mov Disord. 2017;32:36–52.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Volkmann J,
    2. Albanese A,
    3. Antonini A,
    4. et al
    . Selecting deep brain stimulation or infusion therapies in advanced Parkinson’s disease: an evidence-based review. J Neurol. 2013;260:2701–2714.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Barker RA,
    2. Drouin-Ouellet J,
    3. Parmar M
    . Cell-based therapies for Parkinson disease: past insights and future potential. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11:492–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Poewe W,
    2. Seppi K,
    3. Tanner CM,
    4. et al
    . Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17013.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Meissner WG,
    2. Laurencin C,
    3. Tranchant C,
    4. et al
    . Outcome of deep brain stimulation in slowly progressive multiple system atrophy: a clinico-pathological series and review of the literature. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;24:69–75.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Mizuno Y,
    2. Yokochi F,
    3. Ohta S,
    4. Mori H,
    5. Takubo HA
    . 65-year-old man with parkinsonism, gaze palsy, and dementia. No To Shinkei. 1996;48:381–393.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Dehay B,
    2. Bourdenx M,
    3. Gorry P,
    4. et al
    . Targeting alpha-synuclein for treatment of Parkinson’s disease: mechanistic and therapeutic considerations. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:855–866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Tsai RM,
    2. Boxer AL
    . Therapy and clinical trials in frontotemporal dementia: past, present, and future. J Neurochem. 2016;138(suppl 1):211–221.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Williams-Gray CH,
    2. Mason SL,
    3. Evans JR,
    4. et al
    . The CamPaIGN study of Parkinson’s disease: 10-year outlook in an incident population-based cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:1258–1264.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Pinter B,
    2. Diem-Zangerl A,
    3. Wenning GK,
    4. et al
    . Mortality in Parkinson’s disease: a 38-year follow-up study. Mov Disord. 2015;30:266–269.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hellwig S,
    2. Frings L,
    3. Amtage F,
    4. et al
    . 18F-FDG PET is an early predictor of overall survival in suspected atypical parkinsonism. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1541–1546.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Buter TC,
    2. van den Hout A,
    3. Matthews FE,
    4. Larsen JP,
    5. Brayne C,
    6. Aarsland D
    . Dementia and survival in Parkinson disease: a 12-year population study. Neurology. 2008;70:1017–1022.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kempster PA,
    2. Williams DR,
    3. Selikhova M,
    4. Holton J,
    5. Revesz T,
    6. Lees AJ
    . Patterns of levodopa response in Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study. Brain. 2007;130:2123–2128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Hellwig S,
    2. Amtage F,
    3. Kreft A,
    4. et al
    . [18F]FDG-PET is superior to [123I]IBZM-SPECT for the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. Neurology. 2012;79:1314–1322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Bohnen NI,
    2. Minoshima S
    . FDG-PET and molecular brain imaging in the movement disorders clinic. Neurology. 2012;79:1306–1307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Berardelli A,
    2. Wenning GK,
    3. Antonini A,
    4. et al
    . EFNS/MDS-ES/ENS [corrected] recommendations for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:16–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Varrone A,
    2. Asenbaum S,
    3. Vander Borght T,
    4. et al
    . EANM procedure guidelines for PET brain imaging using [18F]FDG, version 2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:2103–2110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Waxman AD,
    2. Herholz K,
    3. Lewis DH,
    4. et al
    . Society of Nuclear Medicine procedure guideline for FDG PET brain imaging. SNMMI website. http://snmmi.files.cms-plus.com/docs/Society%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine%20Procedure%20Guideline%20for%20FDG%20PET%20Brain%20Imaging.pdf. Approved February 8, 2009. Accessed September 19, 2017.
  40. 40.↵
    1. Eckert T,
    2. Barnes A,
    3. Dhawan V,
    4. et al
    . FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders. Neuroimage. 2005;26:912–921.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Juh R,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Moon D,
    4. Choe B,
    5. Suh T
    . Different metabolic patterns analysis of Parkinsonism on the 18F-FDG PET. Eur J Radiol. 2004;51:223–233.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Tang CC,
    2. Poston KL,
    3. Eckert T,
    4. et al
    . Differential diagnosis of parkinsonism: a metabolic imaging study using pattern analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:149–158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Perani D,
    2. Bressi S,
    3. Testa D,
    4. et al
    . Clinical/metabolic correlations in multiple system atrophy: a fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomographic study. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:179–185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Lyoo CH,
    2. Jeong Y,
    3. Ryu YH,
    4. et al
    . Effects of disease duration on the clinical features and brain glucose metabolism in patients with mixed type multiple system atrophy. Brain. 2008;131:438–446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Zalewski N,
    2. Botha H,
    3. Whitwell JL,
    4. Lowe V,
    5. Dickson DW,
    6. Josephs KA
    . FDG-PET in pathologically confirmed spontaneous 4R-tauopathy variants. J Neurol. 2014;261:710–716.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Amtage F,
    2. Maurer C,
    3. Hellwig S,
    4. et al
    . Functional correlates of vertical gaze palsy and other ocular motor deficits in PSP: an FDG-PET study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20:898–906.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    1. Zwergal A,
    2. la Fougere C,
    3. Lorenzl S,
    4. et al
    . Postural imbalance and falls in PSP correlate with functional pathology of the thalamus. Neurology. 2011;77:101–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    1. Park HK,
    2. Kim JS,
    3. Im KC,
    4. et al
    . Functional brain imaging in pure akinesia with gait freezing: [18F] FDG PET and [18F] FP-CIT PET analyses. Mov Disord. 2009;24:237–245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Roh JH,
    2. Suh MK,
    3. Kim EJ,
    4. Go SM,
    5. Na DL,
    6. Seo SW
    . Glucose metabolism in progressive nonfluent aphasia with and without parkinsonism. Neurology. 2010;75:1022–1024.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    1. Wadia PM,
    2. Lang AE
    . The many faces of corticobasal degeneration. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007;13(suppl 3):S336–S340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Amtage F,
    2. Hellwig S,
    3. Kreft A,
    4. et al
    . Neuronal correlates of clinical asymmetry in progressive supranuclear palsy. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:319–325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.
    1. Garraux G,
    2. Salmon E,
    3. Peigneux P,
    4. et al
    . Voxel-based distribution of metabolic impairment in corticobasal degeneration. Mov Disord. 2000;15:894–904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.
    1. Hosaka K,
    2. Ishii K,
    3. Sakamoto S,
    4. et al
    . Voxel-based comparison of regional cerebral glucose metabolism between PSP and corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol Sci. 2002;199:67–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Juh R,
    2. Pae CU,
    3. Lee CU,
    4. et al
    . Voxel based comparison of glucose metabolism in the differential diagnosis of the multiple system atrophy using statistical parametric mapping. Neurosci Res. 2005;52:211–219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Niethammer M,
    2. Tang CC,
    3. Feigin A,
    4. et al
    . A disease-specific metabolic brain network associated with corticobasal degeneration. Brain. 2014;137:3036–3046.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Sha SJ,
    2. Ghosh PM,
    3. Lee SE,
    4. et al
    . Predicting amyloid status in corticobasal syndrome using modified clinical criteria, magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7:8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Eckert T,
    2. Tang C,
    3. Ma Y,
    4. et al
    . Abnormal metabolic networks in atypical parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2008;23:727–733.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.
    1. Ko JH,
    2. Lee CS,
    3. Eidelberg D
    . Metabolic network expression in parkinsonism: clinical and dopaminergic correlations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:683–693.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.
    1. Ma Y,
    2. Tang C,
    3. Spetsieris PG,
    4. Dhawan V,
    5. Eidelberg D
    . Abnormal metabolic network activity in Parkinson’s disease: test-retest reproducibility. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:597–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Peng S,
    2. Eidelberg D,
    3. Ma Y
    . Brain network markers of abnormal cerebral glucose metabolism and blood flow in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Bull. 2014;30:823–837.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Teune LK,
    2. Renken RJ,
    3. Mudali D,
    4. et al
    . Validation of parkinsonian disease-related metabolic brain patterns. Mov Disord. 2013;28:547–551.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Tomǎe P,
    2. Jensterle L,
    3. Grmek M,
    4. et al
    . Abnormal metabolic brain network associated with Parkinson’s disease: replication on a new European sample. Neuroradiology. 2017;59:507–515.
    OpenUrl
  63. 63.↵
    1. Wu P,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Peng S,
    4. et al
    . Metabolic brain network in the Chinese patients with Parkinson’s disease based on 18F-FDG PET imaging. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19:622–627.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Holtbernd F,
    2. Ma Y,
    3. Peng S,
    4. et al
    . Dopaminergic correlates of metabolic network activity in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36:3575–3585.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. 65.↵
    1. Tang CC,
    2. Poston KL,
    3. Dhawan V,
    4. Eidelberg D
    . Abnormalities in metabolic network activity precede the onset of motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2010;30:1049–1056.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    1. Holtbernd F,
    2. Gagnon JF,
    3. Postuma RB,
    4. et al
    . Abnormal metabolic network activity in REM sleep behavior disorder. Neurology. 2014;82:620–627.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    1. Wu P,
    2. Yu H,
    3. Peng S,
    4. et al
    . Consistent abnormalities in metabolic network activity in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder. Brain. 2014;137:3122–3128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Asanuma K,
    2. Tang C,
    3. Ma Y,
    4. et al
    . Network modulation in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2006;129:2667–2678.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    1. Meles SK,
    2. Teune LK,
    3. de Jong BM,
    4. Dierckx RA,
    5. Leenders KL
    . Metabolic imaging in Parkinson disease. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:23–28.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    1. Brajkovic L,
    2. Kostic V,
    3. Sobic-Saranovic D,
    4. et al
    . The utility of FDG-PET in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. Neurol Res. 2017;39:675–684.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.↵
    1. Tripathi M,
    2. Dhawan V,
    3. Peng S,
    4. et al
    . Differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Neuroradiology. 2013;55:483–492.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    1. Minoshima S,
    2. Frey KA,
    3. Koeppe RA,
    4. Foster NL,
    5. Kuhl DE
    . A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer’s disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238–1248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. 73.↵
    1. Tripathi M,
    2. Tang CC,
    3. Feigin A,
    4. et al
    . Automated differential diagnosis of early parkinsonism using metabolic brain networks: a validation study. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:60–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. 74.↵
    1. Garraux G,
    2. Phillips C,
    3. Schrouff J,
    4. et al
    . Multiclass classification of FDG PET scans for the distinction between Parkinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;2:883–893.
    OpenUrl
  75. 75.↵
    1. Emre M,
    2. Aarsland D,
    3. Brown R,
    4. et al
    . Clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2007;22:1689–1707.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    1. Litvan I,
    2. Goldman JG,
    3. Troster AI,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Movement Disorder Society Task Force guidelines. Mov Disord. 2012;27:349–356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Aarsland D,
    2. Andersen K,
    3. Larsen JP,
    4. Lolk A,
    5. Kragh-Sorensen P
    . Prevalence and characteristics of dementia in Parkinson disease: an 8-year prospective study. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:387–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    1. Hely MA,
    2. Reid WG,
    3. Adena MA,
    4. Halliday GM,
    5. Morris JG
    . The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord. 2008;23:837–844.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    1. Pedersen KF,
    2. Larsen JP,
    3. Tysnes OB,
    4. Alves G
    . Natural course of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease: a 5-year population-based study. Neurology. 2017;88:767–774.
    OpenUrl
  80. 80.↵
    1. Petersen RC
    . Mild cognitive impairment. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016;22(2 Dementia):404–418.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    1. Gratwicke J,
    2. Jahanshahi M,
    3. Foltynie T
    . Parkinson’s disease dementia: a neural networks perspective. Brain. 2015;138:1454–1476.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    1. Kehagia AA,
    2. Barker RA,
    3. Robbins TW
    . Cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: the dual syndrome hypothesis. Neurodegener Dis. 2013;11:79–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. 83.↵
    1. Williams-Gray CH,
    2. Evans JR,
    3. Goris A,
    4. et al
    . The distinct cognitive syndromes of Parkinson’s disease: 5 year follow-up of the CamPaIGN cohort. Brain. 2009;132:2958–2969.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    1. Stinton C,
    2. McKeith I,
    3. Taylor JP,
    4. et al
    . Pharmacological management of Lewy body dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:731–742.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.↵
    1. Minoshima S,
    2. Foster NL,
    3. Sima AA,
    4. Frey KA,
    5. Albin RL,
    6. Kuhl DE
    . Alzheimer’s disease versus dementia with Lewy bodies: cerebral metabolic distinction with autopsy confirmation. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:358–365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    1. Vander Borght T,
    2. Minoshima S,
    3. Giordani B,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral metabolic differences in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases matched for dementia severity. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:797–802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. 87.↵
    1. Yong SW,
    2. Yoon JK,
    3. An YS,
    4. Lee PH
    . A comparison of cerebral glucose metabolism in Parkinson’s disease, Parkinson’s disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14:1357–1362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. 88.↵
    1. Garcia-Garcia D,
    2. Clavero P,
    3. Gasca Salas C,
    4. et al
    . Posterior parietooccipital hypometabolism may differentiate mild cognitive impairment from dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1767–1777.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. 89.↵
    1. Meyer PT,
    2. Frings L,
    3. Hellwig S
    . Update on SPECT and PET in parkinsonism—part 2: biomarker imaging of cognitive impairment in Lewy-body diseases. Curr Opin Neurol. 2014;27:398–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. 90.↵
    1. Huang C,
    2. Mattis P,
    3. Tang C,
    4. Perrine K,
    5. Carbon M,
    6. Eidelberg D
    . Metabolic brain networks associated with cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage. 2007;34:714–723.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. 91.↵
    1. Huang C,
    2. Mattis P,
    3. Perrine K,
    4. Brown N,
    5. Dhawan V,
    6. Eidelberg D
    . Metabolic abnormalities associated with mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2008;70:1470–1477.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  92. 92.↵
    1. Meles SK,
    2. Tang CC,
    3. Teune LK,
    4. et al
    . Abnormal metabolic pattern associated with cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a validation study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35:1478–1484.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. 93.↵
    1. Peng S,
    2. Ma Y,
    3. Spetsieris PG,
    4. et al
    . Characterization of disease-related covariance topographies with SSMPCA toolbox: effects of spatial normalization and PET scanners. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:1801–1814.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. 94.↵
    1. Niethammer M,
    2. Tang CC,
    3. Ma Y,
    4. et al
    . Parkinson’s disease cognitive network correlates with caudate dopamine. Neuroimage. 2013;78:204–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    1. Mattis PJ,
    2. Tang CC,
    3. Ma Y,
    4. Dhawan V,
    5. Eidelberg D
    . Network correlates of the cognitive response to levodopa in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2011;77:858–865.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. 96.↵
    1. Bohnen NI,
    2. Koeppe RA,
    3. Minoshima S,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral glucose metabolic features of Parkinson disease and incident dementia: longitudinal study. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:848–855.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  97. 97.↵
    1. Baba T,
    2. Hosokai Y,
    3. Nishio Y,
    4. et al
    . Longitudinal study of cognitive and cerebral metabolic changes in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2017;372:288–293.
    OpenUrl
  98. 98.↵
    1. Firbank MJ,
    2. Yarnall AJ,
    3. Lawson RA,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral glucose metabolism and cognition in newly diagnosed Parkinson’s disease: ICICLE-PD study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88:310–316.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  99. 99.↵
    1. Tard C,
    2. Demailly F,
    3. Delval A,
    4. et al
    . Hypometabolism in posterior and temporal areas of the brain is associated with cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2015;5:569–574.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. 100.↵
    1. Jokinen P,
    2. Scheinin N,
    3. Aalto S,
    4. et al
    . [11C]PIB-, [18F]FDG-PET and MRI imaging in patients with Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010;16:666–670.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. 101.↵
    1. Hosokai Y,
    2. Nishio Y,
    3. Hirayama K,
    4. et al
    . Distinct patterns of regional cerebral glucose metabolism in Parkinson’s disease with and without mild cognitive impairment. Mov Disord. 2009;24:854–862.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. 102.↵
    1. Lyoo CH,
    2. Jeong Y,
    3. Ryu YH,
    4. Rinne JO,
    5. Lee MS
    . Cerebral glucose metabolism of Parkinson’s disease patients with mild cognitive impairment. Eur Neurol. 2010;64:65–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. 103.↵
    1. González-Redondo R,
    2. Garcia-Garcia D,
    3. Clavero P,
    4. et al
    . Grey matter hypometabolism and atrophy in Parkinson’s disease with cognitive impairment: a two-step process. Brain. 2014;137:2356–2367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. 104.↵
    1. Baba T,
    2. Kikuchi A,
    3. Hirayama K,
    4. et al
    . Severe olfactory dysfunction is a prodromal symptom of dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease: a 3 year longitudinal study. Brain. 2012;135:161–169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. 105.↵
    1. Gasca-Salas C,
    2. Clavero P,
    3. Garcia-Garcia D,
    4. Obeso JA,
    5. Rodriguez-Oroz MC
    . Significance of visual hallucinations and cerebral hypometabolism in the risk of dementia in Parkinson’s disease patients with mild cognitive impairment. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37:968–977.
    OpenUrl
  106. 106.↵
    1. Arnaldi D,
    2. Morbelli S,
    3. Brugnolo A,
    4. et al
    . Functional neuroimaging and clinical features of drug naive patients with de novo Parkinson’s disease and probable RBD. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;29:47–53.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication May 31, 2017.
  • Accepted for publication August 10, 2017.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 12
December 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-FDG PET in Parkinsonism: Differential Diagnosis and Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-FDG PET in Parkinsonism: Differential Diagnosis and Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment
Philipp T. Meyer, Lars Frings, Gerta Rücker, Sabine Hellwig
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2017, 58 (12) 1888-1898; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186403

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-FDG PET in Parkinsonism: Differential Diagnosis and Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment
Philipp T. Meyer, Lars Frings, Gerta Rücker, Sabine Hellwig
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2017, 58 (12) 1888-1898; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186403
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • CLINICAL DEMAND AND RATIONALE FOR 18F-FDG PET IMAGING IN PARKINSONISM
    • DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF PARKINSONISM
    • OUTLOOK
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • [18F]Florzolotau PET for the Differential Diagnosis of Parkinsonism in Patients with Suspected 4-Repeat Tauopathies
  • Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes: Structural, Functional, and Molecular Imaging Features
  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0
  • Added value of FDG-PET for detection of progressive supranuclear palsy
  • In vivo assessment of astrocyte reactivity in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy
  • Molecular Imaging Findings on Acute and Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 on the Brain: A Systematic Review
  • 18F-FDG PET Imaging in Neurodegenerative Dementing Disorders: Insights into Subtype Classification, Emerging Disease Categories, and Mixed Dementia with Copathologies
  • Synaptic density and neuronal metabolic function measured by PET in the unilateral 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinsons disease
  • Limits for Reduction of Acquisition Time and Administered Activity in 18F-FDG PET Studies of Alzheimer Dementia and Frontotemporal Dementia
  • Principal Components Analysis of Brain Metabolism Predicts Development of Alzheimer Dementia
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Approaches to Imaging Immune Activation Using PET
  • Large Language Models and Large Multimodal Models in Medical Imaging: A Primer for Physicians
  • Precision Oncology in Melanoma: Changing Practices
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • FDG PET
  • Parkinson disease
  • multiple-system atrophy
  • progressive supranuclear palsy
  • corticobasal degeneration
  • Mild cognitive impairment
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire