Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - Other Solid Tumors

Impact of dual tracer study to differentiate malignant vs benign peritoneal diseases.

Malasani Vindhya, Swagat Dash, Shreya Dang, Raj Abshishek, Deepika Parwan, Neetu Singhal, chaudhuri santanu and Pendharkar Dinesh
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242594;
Malasani Vindhya
1Sarvodaya Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Swagat Dash
1Sarvodaya Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shreya Dang
2P.D. Hinduja National Hospital & Medical Research Centre - Navi Mumbai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raj Abshishek
1Sarvodaya Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deepika Parwan
1Sarvodaya Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neetu Singhal
1Sarvodaya Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
chaudhuri santanu
3pushpanjali cancer care institute
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pendharkar Dinesh
1Sarvodaya Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

242594

Introduction: F18- FDG PET CT scan was the standard imaging modality for detecting peritoneal diseases . However, it is absolutely not tumor specific. To overcome this problem, Ga68 labeled FAPI-46 (fibroblast activation protein inhibitor) was developed. Lilan Fu, Shun Huang et al. showed that the sensitivity for peritoneal detection is around 93.2% by FAPI vs 53.8% by FDG.

we aim to look for the utility of dual tracer study to differentiate benign from malignant pathologies.

Methods: All the oncological patients who had indeterminate or negative findings in F18 FDG PET CT scan underwent Ga 68 FAPI-46 PET CT scan. Results were grouped into 4 categories based on quantification marker SUV (maximum standardized uptake value). Category I: likely benign (FDG positive & FAPI negative or both negative), II : Probably benign (both positive but the SUV of FAPI is ≤ 50% of SUV of FDG), III: indeterminate (both positive with SUV of FAPI ranging from 50-70 % of SUV of FDG), IV: likely malignant (both positive with SUV of FAPI >70% of SUV of FDG or only FAPI positive). Histopathology or follow-up imaging served as the standard for the final diagnosis

Results: We have included a total of 30 patients who had indeterminate findings in F18 FDG PET CT scan. Of these, 4 patients were being evaluated for residual/ recurrent disease.

Likely benign category: All the 6/30 patients were true negative for malignancy; hence FAPI-46 scan alone helped in preventing false positive findings in these patients.

Probably benign category: 4/30 patients in this category were true negative for malignancy; there by showing that dual tracer indeed additionally helped in reducing false positive rate.

Indeterminate category: 6/30 patients in this category, of which 3 (3/6) were malignant histopathologies including serous cyst-adenocarcinoma ovary and endometrial carcinoma and rest 3 (3/6 ) were benign (tubercular and inflammatory).

Likely malignant category: Remaining 14/30 patients were true positive for malignancy. In 2/14 patients who were histo-pathogically proven to have signet ring variant of adenocarcinoma stomach, alone could detect primary and metastatic disease ; hence reducing false negative rate. Additionally, FAPI-46 PET CT scan also helped in effectively detecting primary mitotic lesions in 4/14 patients with histopathology of adenocarcinoma colon, stomach and ovaries. Rest 8/14 patients had positive findings in both the scans, with 2 (2/8) patients positive for residual disease post-surgery, 2 (2/8) with proven recurrent peritoneal disease and remaining 4/(4/8 ) patients were treatment naive.

Conclusions: From the literature survey, we found neither FAPI -46 nor FDG were absolutely tumor specific. But it is already proven that Ga68 FAPI-46 PET CT scan has definitely surpassed F 18FDG PET CT scan in case of sensitivity. In this study, we have found that using dual tracer helped in differentiating benign from malignant thereby, reducing false positive and negative rates in peritoneal diseases. Our major limitation however, was the low study population; thus further studies with larger population groups are required.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of dual tracer study to differentiate malignant vs benign peritoneal diseases.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impact of dual tracer study to differentiate malignant vs benign peritoneal diseases.
Malasani Vindhya, Swagat Dash, Shreya Dang, Raj Abshishek, Deepika Parwan, Neetu Singhal, chaudhuri santanu, Pendharkar Dinesh
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242594;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of dual tracer study to differentiate malignant vs benign peritoneal diseases.
Malasani Vindhya, Swagat Dash, Shreya Dang, Raj Abshishek, Deepika Parwan, Neetu Singhal, chaudhuri santanu, Pendharkar Dinesh
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242594;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Radiation Absorbed Dose to Spinal Cord: Therapy of Leptomeningeal Metastasis Using Beta-Emission Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Initial Clinical Experience with 177Lu-EB-FAPI Radioligand Therapy in Patients with End-Stage Metastatic Cancers
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - Other Solid Tumors

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire