Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - Head and Neck

Multi-site, prospective trial evaluating FET-PET In Glioblastoma (FIG) Study (TROG 18.06): FET-PET biologic target volume delineation for radiation planning

Andrew Scott, Roslyn Francis, Sze Ting Lee, Lau Eddie, Angela Whitehead, Olivia Cook, Nathaniel Barry, Martin Ebert, Hui Gan, Bradford Moffat, Greg Fitt, Alisha Moore, Paul Thomas, David Pattison, Tim Akhurst, Ramin Alipour, Elizabeth Thomas, Geoffrey Schembri, Edward Hsiao, Peter Lin, Tam Ly, June Yap, Ian Kirkwood, Wilson Vallat, Shahroz Khan, Dayanethee Krishna, Stanley Ngai, Chris Yu, Scott Beuzeville, Tow Chan Yeow, David Wong, Madeleine McGuiness, Dale Bailey, Rachael Dykyj, Alana Rossi, Hamish Evans and Eng-Siew Koh
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242270;
Andrew Scott
1Austin Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roslyn Francis
2University of Western Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sze Ting Lee
1Austin Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lau Eddie
3Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Whitehead
4Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivia Cook
5TROG Cancer Research, Newcastle, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathaniel Barry
2University of Western Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Ebert
2University of Western Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui Gan
6Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bradford Moffat
7University of Melbourne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Greg Fitt
3Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alisha Moore
8TROG Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Thomas
9Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Pattison
9Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Akhurst
10University of Melbourne Department of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramin Alipour
11Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Thomas
12Perth Children's and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospitals
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey Schembri
13Royal North Shore Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Hsiao
13Royal North Shore Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Lin
14Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tam Ly
14Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
June Yap
14Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Kirkwood
15Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wilson Vallat
16Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shahroz Khan
17Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dayanethee Krishna
17Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanley Ngai
18Princess Alexandria Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Yu
19Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Beuzeville
20St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tow Chan Yeow
20St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Wong
21The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madeleine McGuiness
21The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dale Bailey
13Royal North Shore Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachael Dykyj
5TROG Cancer Research, Newcastle, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alana Rossi
5TROG Cancer Research, Newcastle, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hamish Evans
5TROG Cancer Research, Newcastle, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eng-Siew Koh
22Liverpool Hospital, NSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

242270

Introduction: To provide 1) a brief recruitment update from the prospective multi-site trial evaluating O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine Positron Emission Tomography (FET-PET) in Glioblastoma (FIG) study (1) (ACTRN12619001735145) and 2) assess the impact of central Nuclear Medicine physician (NMP) review of prospective FET-PET1 delineation of biological target volume (BTV) for radiation planning.

Methods: Up to 210 GBM participants across 11 Australian sites will undergo FET-PET post-surgery/pre-chemo-RT [CRT] (FET-PET1), one month post CRT (FET-PET2) and at suspected progression (FET-PET3) to determine FET-PET’s role in radiotherapy planning, pseudoprogression management and prognostication. Group 1 participants enter at timepoint 1 (FET-PET1 and MRI1), whilst Group 2 are registered and undergo timepoint 2 imaging. For timepoint 1, RT target volumes are derived per standard contrast MRI with hybrid post-hoc RT volumes created by incorporating the FET-PET1 NM-derived BTV. The FET-PET1 NM-derived BTV is derived using a standardised workflow developed in MiM version 7.0.

All trial sites and NMP have passed the credentialling phase which included three benchmarking cases involving BTV delineation (2). For the prospective recruitment phase, a minimum of three cases per site (n=10) are planned for central review of BTV delineation, with resubmission rate and reasons documented.

Results: Trial recruitment commenced in January 2021. To date, 168 (n=105 Group 1 and n=63 Group 2) participants have been enrolled, aiming for a target of 140 Group 1 participants. The IDSMC reviewed the trial on 17 October 2023 and supported that the trial continue, as planned.

During the trial credentialling phase of the study, published results demonstrated variations of FET-PET1 derived regions, including BTV in 25/72 (34.7%; 13 minor and 12 major) of cases, which were subsequently addressed following central review (2). In the prospective recruitment phase of the study, 40 participant FET-PET1 cases with BTV delineation across activated 10 sites to date have undergone central review, with 6/40 (15%) requiring resubmission. Reasons for resubmission/protocol deviations included the incorrect selection of MRI and other options within MiM workflow (n=3), overcontouring of Static GTV (n=2) related to incorrect placement of the background region of interest (ROI) and manual adjustment of the dynamic volume of interest (VOI) (n=1).

Conclusions: The FIG trial is expected to conclude in 2024 with analyses planned at one year post CRT completion. Despite improvements in case resubmission rates compared to the credentialling phase, central review of prospective FET-PET1-derived BTV delineation remains important in ensuring adherence to study workflow and quality assurance across sites with varying experience in FET-PET. To our knowledge, the FIG study is the largest prospective multi-site study of its kind addressing FET-PET’s role in management of pseudoprogression, prognostication and impact on adjuvant radiation planning.

References:

• Koh E-S, Gan HK, Senko C, Francis RJ, Ebert M, Lee ST, et al. F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine (FET) in glioblastoma (FIG) TROG 18.06 study: protocol for a prospective, multicentre PET/CT trial. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e071327. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071327.

• Barry N, Francis RJ, Ebert MA, Koh E-S, Rowshanfarzad P, Hassan GM, et al. Delineation and agreement of FET PET biological volumes in glioblastoma: results of the nuclear medicine credentialing program from the prospective, multi-centre trial evaluating FET PET In Glioblastoma (FIG) study—TROG 18.06. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2023. 50(13): 3970–3981. doi:10.1007/s00259-023-06371-5.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multi-site, prospective trial evaluating FET-PET In Glioblastoma (FIG) Study (TROG 18.06): FET-PET biologic target volume delineation for radiation planning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Multi-site, prospective trial evaluating FET-PET In Glioblastoma (FIG) Study (TROG 18.06): FET-PET biologic target volume delineation for radiation planning
Andrew Scott, Roslyn Francis, Sze Ting Lee, Lau Eddie, Angela Whitehead, Olivia Cook, Nathaniel Barry, Martin Ebert, Hui Gan, Bradford Moffat, Greg Fitt, Alisha Moore, Paul Thomas, David Pattison, Tim Akhurst, Ramin Alipour, Elizabeth Thomas, Geoffrey Schembri, Edward Hsiao, Peter Lin, Tam Ly, June Yap, Ian Kirkwood, Wilson Vallat, Shahroz Khan, Dayanethee Krishna, Stanley Ngai, Chris Yu, Scott Beuzeville, Tow Chan Yeow, David Wong, Madeleine McGuiness, Dale Bailey, Rachael Dykyj, Alana Rossi, Hamish Evans, Eng-Siew Koh
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242270;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Multi-site, prospective trial evaluating FET-PET In Glioblastoma (FIG) Study (TROG 18.06): FET-PET biologic target volume delineation for radiation planning
Andrew Scott, Roslyn Francis, Sze Ting Lee, Lau Eddie, Angela Whitehead, Olivia Cook, Nathaniel Barry, Martin Ebert, Hui Gan, Bradford Moffat, Greg Fitt, Alisha Moore, Paul Thomas, David Pattison, Tim Akhurst, Ramin Alipour, Elizabeth Thomas, Geoffrey Schembri, Edward Hsiao, Peter Lin, Tam Ly, June Yap, Ian Kirkwood, Wilson Vallat, Shahroz Khan, Dayanethee Krishna, Stanley Ngai, Chris Yu, Scott Beuzeville, Tow Chan Yeow, David Wong, Madeleine McGuiness, Dale Bailey, Rachael Dykyj, Alana Rossi, Hamish Evans, Eng-Siew Koh
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242270;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Initial Experience of 68Ga-Trivehexin PET-CT in follow-up cases of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) and Head-to-Head Comparison with 18F-FDG PET-CT
  • Leptomeningeal Metastases [LM] Phase 1/2a Dose Escalation Trial using Rhenium (Re-186) obisbemeda{Re-186-Nanoliposome (186RNL)}: Update for Initial Safety, Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy
  • GLIAA: FET-PET- vs. MRI-based re-irradiation in recurrent glioblastoma. A prospective randomized trial.
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - Head and Neck

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire