Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - GYN

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Involvement in Cervical Cancer Patients with Negative Post-Treatment PET Scans

Fereshteh Yousefirizi, Caroline Holloway, Pete Tonseth, Abraham Alexander, Sara Harsini, Carlos Uribe and Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242237;
Fereshteh Yousefirizi
1BCCRC/UBC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Holloway
2BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pete Tonseth
3BC Cancer Agency–Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abraham Alexander
3BC Cancer Agency–Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Harsini
4BC Cancer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Uribe
4BC Cancer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arman Rahmim
5University of British Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

242237

Introduction: The FIGO/TNM staging system, with emphasis on lymph node involvement, is vital in cervical cancer prognosis. Identifying lymph node status pre-treatment aids personalized planning, reducing unnecessary surgeries or extensive radiotherapy. Our study explores disease-free survival in patients initially diagnosed with lymph node involvement but exhibiting negative post-treatment PET results.

Methods: Our study considered a cohort of 64 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer with the average age of 47.9±14.5. The patient selection spanned from 2015 to 2020, and included both pre-treatment PET scans and a post-treatment PET scan, conducted at a median of 5.54 months after radiotherapy. All patients had confirmed histological diagnosis of cervical cancer, with 61.9% showing lymph node involvement in their pre-treatment PET (Pre-PET) and 31.7% (n=20) experiencing recurrence following curative-intent radiotherapy. Notably, in this study we focused on the subset of cases, constituting 73.0% (n=46), characterized by negative post-treatment PET results. Disease-free survival after radiotherapy was determined based on follow-up imaging selected as per clinical practice. Our analysis focused on several key features extracted from Pre-PET scans, including lymph node involvement, the total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) of the primary tumor and lymph nodes, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor, and the number of involved lymph nodes. We employed a robust approach to hyperparameter tuning using grid search, and assessed the predictive performance of machine learning algorithms (Gradient Boosting, Ridge, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XG Boost), Linear Regression, Random Forest regressor, Lasso, K nearest Neighbors regressor, and Support Vector Regression (SVR)) for disease-free survival analysis through nested cross-validation. The hyperparameter tuning process was facilitated by GridSearchCV using negative mean squared error as the scoring metric. The outer loop iterates through folds, utilizing the best models obtained from grid search for each regression algorithm. The concordance index (c-index) is employed as an evaluation metric for disease-free survival prediction. Additionally, the Mann-Whitney U test is conducted to assess significant differences in performance between pairs of regressors.

Results: Within the subgroup of cases with negative post-treatment PET results, 21.7% (n=10) encountered recurrence. Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank test results revealed a significant difference in clinical disease-free survival of patients with lymph node (LN) involvement, for the subgroup with negative post-treatment PET ('LN Involvement & PostPET Negative') compared to those with positive post-treatment PET ('LN Involvement & PostPET Positive'), with a p-value of 0.033. On the other hand, we did not detect statistically significant difference in disease-free survival of patients without LN involvement, for the subgroups with negative vs. positive post-treatment PET results ('No LN Involvement & PostPET Negative' and 'No LN Involvement & PostPET Positive'), with a p-value of 0.58. Gradient Boosting, Ridge and XGBoost outperformed other approaches with c-indices of 0.671±0.120, 0.669±0.246 and 0.659±0.204 respectively (p-value<0.05) for progression prediction in cases with LN involvement and negative post-PET.

Conclusions: Our study highlighted the crucial interplay of lymph node involvement in influencing clinical disease-free survival. Notably, Gradient Boosting, Ridge, and XGBoost machine learning demonstrated superior predictive performance, underscoring their potential as effective models for prognosis in this specific patient population. These findings offer valuable insights to enhance outcomes in the management of cervical cancer, particularly for patients with node involvement in pre-treatment PET scans whose post-treatment PET results are negative.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Involvement in Cervical Cancer Patients with Negative Post-Treatment PET Scans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Involvement in Cervical Cancer Patients with Negative Post-Treatment PET Scans
Fereshteh Yousefirizi, Caroline Holloway, Pete Tonseth, Abraham Alexander, Sara Harsini, Carlos Uribe, Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242237;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Involvement in Cervical Cancer Patients with Negative Post-Treatment PET Scans
Fereshteh Yousefirizi, Caroline Holloway, Pete Tonseth, Abraham Alexander, Sara Harsini, Carlos Uribe, Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242237;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - GYN

  • [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT imaging in cervical cancer, a comparison with [18F]FDG
  • Intraindividual comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT with 18F-FDG PET/CT for imaging of cancer of the cervix.
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - GYN

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Involvement in Cervical Cancer Patients with Negative Post-Treatment PET Scans

  • [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT imaging in cervical cancer, a comparison with [18F]FDG
  • Intraindividual comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT with 18F-FDG PET/CT for imaging of cancer of the cervix.
  • Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Involvement in Cervical Cancer Patients with Negative Post-Treatment PET Scans
Show more Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Involvement in Cervical Cancer Patients with Negative Post-Treatment PET Scans

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire