Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties - Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research & Radiation Safety

Radioligand Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in the Older Patients - Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors for Survival

Simon Weber, Anna Seitz, Hubert Kübler, Andreas Buck, Rudolf Werner and Philipp Hartrampf
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241969;
Simon Weber
1Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin des Universitätsklinikums Würzburg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Seitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hubert Kübler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Buck
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rudolf Werner
3Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp Hartrampf
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

241969

Introduction: The peak incidence of prostate cancer (PC) is over 75 years of age, making elderly patients a major target population for novel treatment options. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) using [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in individuals at least 75 years of age, including predictors of overall survival (OS).

Methods: Fifty-six men (≥75 years) with metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) treated with PSMA RLT using [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T were identified. Adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 by assessing hematologic (platelets, leukocytes, hemoglobin) and renal (eGFR, creatinine) parameters. In addition, baseline liver parameters (including aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (AP)), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Gleason score were recorded. PSA response was determined at every cycle after initiation of RLT (available for 47 patients). Metastatic spread was determined in bone, lymph nodes, liver and lung. Quantitative PET parameters including mean, peak and maximum SUV, PSMA positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and total PSMA lesion (TL-PSMA = PSMA-TV*SUV mean) were also determined. In 37 patients with available interim PSMA PET/CT after two cycles, changes from baseline (providing Δ) were determined and PET response was classified according to RECIP 1.0, while biochemical response according to PCWG3 criteria. Univariable Cox regression was performed, followed by multivariable and Kaplan-Meier analyses to determine the association with OS.

Results: Treated patients were diagnosed with an initial Gleason score of 8 (5-10) and presented with a median age at first cycle of 78 years (range, 75-95). A median cumulative activity of 18.2 GBq (range, 4.9-54.8 GBq) [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T was administered in a median of 3 (range, 1-9) cycles of RLT. No CTC grade ≥III occurred after RLT, but the following grade I/II hematologic CTCAEs were observed: anemia in 21%, followed by leukocytopenia in 17% and thrombocytopenia in 7%. eGFR decreased by 2.5%, with grade I/II CTCAE in 19% (creatinine increase 5%; creatinine CTCAE grade I/II, 14%). Median OS was 11 months, while 34/56 (60.7%) patients died. 38/47 (80.9%) showed a decrease in PSA after therapy with a median decrease of 57% (range, 0.6 - 99%), 23/38 achieved a decrease of more than 50%.In univariable analysis, the following parameters were significantly associated with OS: PSA, CRP, LDH, AST, AP, and hemoglobin (p<0.05, each). We included PSA, CRP and LDH in a multivariable Cox regression and additionally adjusted for PSMA-TV. Baseline PSA (per ng/ml, HR, 1.001 [95%CI, 1.000-1.002]; P<0.1), LDH (per U/l, HR, 1.008 [95%CI 1.002-1.013]; P<0.01) remained significant prognosticators for OS, while PSMA-TV and CRP did not. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in OS for patients with progressive disease (PD) according to RECIP or PCWG3 alone, but the combination of both criteria showed a significantly shorter OS (11 vs. 22 months, HR, 3.3 [95%CI 0.9-11.5]; P<0.01) in patients with PD. Patients with any PSA response after RLT showed a longer OS (21 vs. 7 months, HR, 0.3 [95%CI 0.1-1.2]; P<0.01).

Conclusions: RLT with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T is safe in patients older than 75 years and showed results comparable to previous studies including also men of younger age. Initial lower PSA and LDH were associated with longer OS in these patients, while PSMA-TV was not. Patients who have a decrease in PSA after starting RLT have a significantly longer OS, highlighting the importance of biochemical response to RLT. A combination of RECIP and PCWG3 should be preferred to assess response.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radioligand Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in the Older Patients - Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors for Survival
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Radioligand Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in the Older Patients - Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors for Survival
Simon Weber, Anna Seitz, Hubert Kübler, Andreas Buck, Rudolf Werner, Philipp Hartrampf
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241969;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radioligand Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in the Older Patients - Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors for Survival
Simon Weber, Anna Seitz, Hubert Kübler, Andreas Buck, Rudolf Werner, Philipp Hartrampf
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241969;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Is long-axial field-of-view PET/CT cost effective? An international health economic analysis
  • Effects of adding distal forearm bone densitometry to axial bone densitometry for the diagnosis of osteoporosis: prevalence and risk factors for diagnostic discordance
Show more General Clinical Specialties - Outcomes/Comparative Effectiveness Research & Radiation Safety

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire