Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes-Radioactive & Nonradioactive - Novel Multimodality & Nonradioactive Probes

Assessment of silver sulfide nanoparticles as a contrast agent for spectral photon-counting mammography

Jessica Hsu, Kristen Lau, David Cormode, Andrew Maidment and Weibo Cai
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241310;
Jessica Hsu
1University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristen Lau
2University of Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Cormode
2University of Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Maidment
2University of Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weibo Cai
3University of Wisconsin - Madison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

241310

Introduction: Mammography has extended in recent years to include a dual-energy approach, which is based on K-edge imaging. This technique utilizes contrast agents to increase tumor detection in women with dense breasts through weighted subtraction between the low- and high-energy images. However, dual-energy mammography (DEM) requires two sequential exposures at two different energies, leading to higher doses as well as misregistration artifacts from patient movement. On the other hand, spectral mammography, an emerging technology similar to DEM, but making use of photon-counting detectors, provides energy information via a single x-ray exposure. This system uses less radiation than DEM, without impacting image quality, and eliminates motion artifacts associated with DEM. This technique has also been shown to improve contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and specificity without contrast injection, resulting in better breast lesion characterization. Currently, contrast-enhanced mammography is performed using iodinated small molecules, but these agents produce sub-optimal contrast due to iodine’s relatively high K-edge. Thus, there exists a need to explore novel imaging agents that are explicitly designed for contrast-enhanced photon-counting mammography. Recently, our group identified silver sulfide nanoparticles (Ag2S-NP) to generate stronger contrast than iodine in DEM, as silver’s lower K-edge is well matched to the energies used. We therefore decided to investigate the feasibility of using Ag2S-NP as a spectral mammography specific contrast agent.

Methods: In this study, monodisperse, ultrasmall Ag2S-NP were synthesized by heating a mixture of silver nitrate and glutathione in ethylene glycol (Fig. S1) and were purified via repeated centrifugation. These nanoparticles were characterized using various analytical tools such as TEM, DLS, and zeta potential (Fig. A). The biocompatibility of Ag2S-NP was evaluated using the LIVE/DEAD assay in five cell lines after 24 hours of treatment. To evaluate the potential of Ag2S-NP as a photon-counting mammography contrast agent, a Philips MicroDose SI prototype mammography system was used to image a customized ramp phantom composed of adipose and glandular tissue-equivalent materials. The following acquisition parameters were used: 26-40 kV, 12-24 mAs, and 0.28-0.40 high bin fractions (HBF). Ag2S-NP with concentrations ranging from 1 to 30 mg Ag/ml along with PBS and water were inserted in the phantom (Fig. B).

Results: These sub-5 nm nanoparticles remain well suspended in PBS and serum, proving their robust stability under physiological conditions. Nearly 100% relative cell viability was observed even at a dose of 1 mg Ag/ml, indicating good biocompatibility (Fig. S2). Analysis of the phantom images shows a linear correlation between Ag2S-NP concentration and DE signal at each scanning condition (Fig. S3). Ag2S-NP produce significantly higher CNR than iodine over the concentrations (Fig. S4) and energies used, while iodine signal is not detectable below 35 kV (Fig. C). The imaging sensitivity of Ag2S-NP is significantly greater than that of iodine, even at energies above iodine’s K-edge (Fig. D). The optimal energy for detection of iodine is beyond the clinical mammographic energy range. Lastly, HBF calibration, which determines the threshold energy for count binning, could be further reduced to enhance the contrast of Ag2S-NP (Fig. E). Therefore, silver can be imaged at lower mammographic energies (< 35 kV) without compromising image quality, which results in radiation dose savings (Fig. S5).

Conclusions: We have synthesized Ag2S-NP that have good stability and excellent biocompatibility. When compared to iodine, these nanoparticles provide improved contrast production, dose efficiency and sensitivity in photon-counting mammography at clinically relevant beam energies, demonstrating their utility as a contrast agent for this new technique for breast cancer screening.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of silver sulfide nanoparticles as a contrast agent for spectral photon-counting mammography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Assessment of silver sulfide nanoparticles as a contrast agent for spectral photon-counting mammography
Jessica Hsu, Kristen Lau, David Cormode, Andrew Maidment, Weibo Cai
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241310;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of silver sulfide nanoparticles as a contrast agent for spectral photon-counting mammography
Jessica Hsu, Kristen Lau, David Cormode, Andrew Maidment, Weibo Cai
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241310;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Development of Molecularly Targeted Photoacoustic Imaging Agents for Prostate Cancer Imaging
  • Novel Conjugation approaches to developing RadioImmune Conjugates - Case Studies
  • Development and evaluation of 68Ga-D75CM-NODAGA: A 68Ga-Labeled multimodal imaging tracer for sentinel lymph node detection
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes-Radioactive & Nonradioactive - Novel Multimodality & Nonradioactive Probes

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire