Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT–Guided, Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

John Nikitas, Angela Castellanos Rieger, Andrea Farolfi, Ameen Seyedroudbari, Amar U. Kishan, Nicholas G. Nickols, Michael L. Steinberg, Luca F. Valle, Matthew Rettig, Johannes Czernin and Jeremie Calais
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2024, 65 (9) 1387-1394; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267922
John Nikitas
1Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Castellanos Rieger
2Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Farolfi
2Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
3Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ameen Seyedroudbari
2Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amar U. Kishan
1Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas G. Nickols
1Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
4Radiation Oncology Service, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael L. Steinberg
1Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luca F. Valle
1Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
4Radiation Oncology Service, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Rettig
5Departments of Medicine and Urology, UCLA, Los Angeles; and
6Division of Hematology–Oncology, Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Czernin
2Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremie Calais
2Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (A) PFS. (B) Biochemical recurrence-free survival. (C) Freedom from local progression (40 sites). (D) Freedom from distant progression. (E) Freedom from new lines of systemic therapy. (F) OS.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Change in PSA level from baseline at 6 mo. Biochemical response was defined as PSA decrease ≥ 50% from baseline. *>100% increase.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    (A) Comparison of patients who changed systemic therapy vs. patients who did not. (B) Comparison of patients who had nodal metastasis vs. bone or visceral metastasis. (C) Comparison of patients who had single vs. multiple treated metastases.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    PSMA PET/CT showed new metastases (arrows) in C4 vertebra and right sphenoid bone. Patient underwent metastasis-directed radiotherapy to both sites. Repeat PSMA PET/CT showed resolution of PSMA avidity (arrows) in both treated sites. It also showed multifocal distant disease progression, and patient subsequently started 177Lu-PSMA therapy.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    PSMA PET/CT showed new left sacral metastasis with stable disease in left femur and sternum (arrows). Patient underwent metastasis-directed radiotherapy to sacrum. Repeat PSMA PET/CT showed in-field local failure in sacrum and new progression in left femur and sternum (arrows). Patient underwent reirradiation to sacrum and metastasis-directed radiotherapy to left femur and sternum.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Patient Characteristics at Time of PSMA PET/CT (n = 24 Patients)

    CharacteristicData
    Median age (y)68.8 (IQR, 65.7–71.7)
    Median time since initial diagnosis (y)6.1 (IQR, 3.6–12.0)
    Median time since castration resistance (y)1.6 (IQR, 0.3–3.7)
    Median PSA (ng/mL)1.2 (IQR, 0.4–3.2)
    Initial NCCN risk group (n)
     Localized favorable intermediate risk3 (12.5%)
     Localized unfavorable intermediate risk2 (8.3%)
     Localized high risk9 (37.5%)
     Localized very high risk3 (12.5%)
     Metastatic6 (25.0%)
     Unknown1 (4.2%)
    Prior therapies (n)
     RP + ADT + ARPI5 (20.8%)
     RP + RT + ADT5 (20.8%)
     RP + RT + ADT + ARPI +/− sipuleucel-T7 (29.2%)
     RP + RT + ADT + ARPI + chemotherapy2 (8.3%)
     RT + ADT + ARPI1 (4.2%)
     ADT + ARPI +/− sipuleucel-T3 (12.5%)
     ADT + chemotherapy + 177Lu-PSMA-6171 (4.2%)
    • NCCN = National Comprehensive Cancer Network; RP = radical prostatectomy; RT = radiotherapy.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    PSMA PET/CT Findings (n = 24 Patients)

    FindingData
    On systemic therapy at time of PSMA PET/CT23 (95.8%)
    Indication for PSMA PET/CT
     Biochemical recurrence15 (62.5%)
     Evaluation of treatment response9 (37.5%)
    T+ disease5 (20.8%)
    N1 disease13 (54.2%)
    M1 disease20 (83.3%)
     M1a only6 (25.0%)
     M1b only12 (50.0%)
     M1a + M1b1 (4.2%)
     M1c only1 (4.2%)
    Staging
     miT0N1M03 (12.5%)
     miT+N1M01 (4.2%)
     miT0N0M1a1 (4.2%)
     miT+N0M1a1 (4.2%)
     miT0N1M1a4 (16.7%)
     miT0N0M1b6 (25.0%)
     miT+N0M1b2 (8.3%)
     miT0N1M1b4 (16.7%)
     miT+N1M1b1 (4.2%)
     miT0N0M1c1 (4.2%)
    • Data are number.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    PSMA PET/CT Lesions (n = 24 Patients)

    Visible lesionsnNew or progressing lesionsStable lesionsTreated lesionsNontreated lesions
    16 (25.0%)1010
    24 (16.7%)2020
    1 (4.2%)1111
    33 (12.5%)3030
    3 (12.5%)2121
    4 (16.7%)1212
    51 (4.2%)2323
    61 (4.2%)2424
    >101 (4.2%)2>102>10
    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Patient Treatment Characteristics (n = 24 Patients)

    CharacteristicData
    Median time from PSMA PET/CT to metastasis-directed radiotherapy (mo)1.4 (IQR, 0.9–2.8)
    Treated sites (n)
     111 (45.8%)
     210 (41.7%)
     33 (12.5%)
    Concurrent systemic therapy (n)
     ADT4 (16.7%)
     ADT + sipuleucel-T3 (12.5%)
     ADT + ARPI16 (66.7%)
     ADT + ARPI + sipuleucel-T1 (4.2%)
    Change in systemic therapy (n)
     Continued preexisting systemic therapy17 (70.8%)
     Started new systemic therapy7 (29.2%)
    • View popup
    TABLE 5.

    Treated Site Characteristics (n = 40 Sites)

    CharacteristicProstate/prostate bed (n = 5)Lymph nodes (n = 15)Bones (n = 19)Viscera (n = 1)
    Median size (cm)3.8 (IQR: 2.9–4.0)1.1 (IQR: 0.6–1.1)1.6 (IQR: 1.2–2.2)2.0
    Median SUVmax10.4 (IQR: 4.2–30.2)12.6 (IQR: 6.7–28.7)7.8 (IQR: 3.7–14.5)17.8
    Location
     Prostate3 (60.0%)
     Prostate bed1 (20.0%)
     Bladder base1 (20.0%)
     Pelvic lymph nodes9 (60.0%)
     Retroperitoneal lymph nodes6 (40.0%)
     Pelvic bone8 (42.1%)
     Spine6 (31.6%)
     Ribs/sternum4 (21.1%)
     Skull1 (5.3%)
     Corpus cavernosum1 (100%)
    Treatment modality
     SBRT3 (60.0%)8 (53.3%)19 (100%)0 (0.0%)
     Intensity-modulated radiotherapy2 (40.0%)7 (46.7%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
     High-dose-rate brachytherapy0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (100%)
    Dose and fractionation
     35–40 Gy in 5 fractions3 (60.0%)
     66–74 Gy in 37 fractions2 (40.0%)
     32 Gy in 4 fractions1 (6.7%)
     30–40 Gy in 5 fractions7 (46.7%)
     55–60 Gy in 23–33 fractions4 (26.7%)
     Unknown3 (20%)
     18 Gy in 1 fraction2 (10.5%)
     18–27 Gy in 3 fractions10 (52.6%)
     25 Gy in 5 fractions1 (5.3%)
     35–50 Gy in 5 fractions6 (31.6%)
     35 Gy in 8 fractions1 (100%)
    • View popup
    TABLE 6.

    Long-Term Clinical Outcomes (n = 24 Patients)

    OutcomeMedian (mo)1 y (%)2 y (%)4 y (%)
    Rate95% CIRate95% CIRate95% CIRate95% CI
    PFS16.49.8–23.069.750.9–88.538.718.5–58.929.010.0–48.0
    Biochemical recurrence-free survival16.49.8–23.069.750.9–88.538.718.5–58.933.213.2–53.2
    Freedom from local progressionNR94.687.3–10082.970.4–95.473.756.8–90.6
    Freedom from distant progression19.58.8–30.369.750.9–88.538.318.1–58.532.912.9–52.9
    Freedom from new lines of systemic therapy29.07.6–50.482.867.5–98.152.331.9–72.739.217.2–61.2
    OSNR95.787.3–10091.179.3–10068.845.1–92.5
    • NR = not reached.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 9
September 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT–Guided, Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT–Guided, Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
John Nikitas, Angela Castellanos Rieger, Andrea Farolfi, Ameen Seyedroudbari, Amar U. Kishan, Nicholas G. Nickols, Michael L. Steinberg, Luca F. Valle, Matthew Rettig, Johannes Czernin, Jeremie Calais
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2024, 65 (9) 1387-1394; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267922

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT–Guided, Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
John Nikitas, Angela Castellanos Rieger, Andrea Farolfi, Ameen Seyedroudbari, Amar U. Kishan, Nicholas G. Nickols, Michael L. Steinberg, Luca F. Valle, Matthew Rettig, Johannes Czernin, Jeremie Calais
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2024, 65 (9) 1387-1394; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267922
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 177Lu-PSMA-617 Consolidation Therapy After Docetaxel in Patients with Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
  • Transarterial Radioembolization in the TACOME Trial: Dosimetric Analysis and Clinical Features in Predicting Response and Overall Survival
  • Retreatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients with 223Ra Therapy in Daily Practice
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • castration resistance
  • metastasis-directed therapy
  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen PET
  • radiation therapy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire