Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

68Ga-FAP-2286 PET of Solid Tumors: Biodistribution, Dosimetry, and Comparison with 18F-FDG

Brad Kline, Surekha Yadav, Youngho Seo, Robin Cumming Ippisch, Jessa Castillo, Rahul R. Aggarwal, Robin Kate Kelley, Spencer C. Behr, Robert R. Flavell, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Michelle Melisko, Hope S. Rugo, Victoria Wang, Sue S. Yom, Patrick Ha, Fei Jiang and Thomas A. Hope
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (6) 938-943; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267281
Brad Kline
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Surekha Yadav
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Youngho Seo
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin Cumming Ippisch
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessa Castillo
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rahul R. Aggarwal
2Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin Kate Kelley
2Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spencer C. Behr
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert R. Flavell
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
2Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Courtney Lawhn-Heath
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Melisko
2Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hope S. Rugo
2Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria Wang
2Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sue S. Yom
3Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Ha
4Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fei Jiang
5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas A. Hope
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), expressed in the tumor microenvironment of a variety of cancers, has become a target of novel PET tracers. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the imaging characteristics of 68Ga-FAP-2286, present the first—to our knowledge—dosimetry analysis to date, and compare the agent with 18F-FDG and FAPI compounds. Methods: Patients were administered 219 ± 43 MBq of 68Ga-FAP-2286 and scanned after 60 min. Uptake was measured in up to 5 lesions per patient and within the kidneys, spleen, liver, and mediastinum (blood pool). Absorbed doses were evaluated using MIM Encore and OLINDA/EXM version 1.1 using the International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 tissue weighting factor. Results: Forty-six patients were imaged with 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET. The highest average uptake was seen in sarcoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and colon cancer. The lowest uptake was found in lung cancer and testicular cancer. The average SUVmax was significantly higher on 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET than on 18F-FDG PET in cholangiocarcinoma (18.2 ± 6.4 vs. 9.1 ± 5.0, P = 0.007), breast cancer (11.1 ± 6.8 vs. 4.1 ± 2.2, P < 0.001), colon cancer (13.8 ± 2.2 vs. 7.6 ± 1.7, P = 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (9.3 ± 3.5 vs. 4.7 ± 1.3, P = 0.01), head and neck cancer (11.3 ± 3.5 vs. 7.6 ± 5.5, P = 0.04), and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (7.4 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.01). The total-body effective dose was estimated at 1.16E−02 mSv/MBq, with the greatest absorbed organ dose in the urinary bladder wall (9.98E−02 mGy/MBq). Conclusion: 68Ga-FAP-2286 biodistribution, dosimetry, and tumor uptake were similar to those of previously reported FAPI compounds. Additionally,68Ga-FAP-2286 PET had consistently higher uptake than 18F-FDG PET. These results are especially promising in the setting of small-volume disease and differentiating tumor from inflammatory uptake.

  • dosimetry
  • FAP-2286
  • fibroblast activation protein
  • PET

Footnotes

  • Published online May 2, 2024.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 6
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga-FAP-2286 PET of Solid Tumors: Biodistribution, Dosimetry, and Comparison with 18F-FDG
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
68Ga-FAP-2286 PET of Solid Tumors: Biodistribution, Dosimetry, and Comparison with 18F-FDG
Brad Kline, Surekha Yadav, Youngho Seo, Robin Cumming Ippisch, Jessa Castillo, Rahul R. Aggarwal, Robin Kate Kelley, Spencer C. Behr, Robert R. Flavell, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Michelle Melisko, Hope S. Rugo, Victoria Wang, Sue S. Yom, Patrick Ha, Fei Jiang, Thomas A. Hope
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (6) 938-943; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267281

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
68Ga-FAP-2286 PET of Solid Tumors: Biodistribution, Dosimetry, and Comparison with 18F-FDG
Brad Kline, Surekha Yadav, Youngho Seo, Robin Cumming Ippisch, Jessa Castillo, Rahul R. Aggarwal, Robin Kate Kelley, Spencer C. Behr, Robert R. Flavell, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Michelle Melisko, Hope S. Rugo, Victoria Wang, Sue S. Yom, Patrick Ha, Fei Jiang, Thomas A. Hope
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (6) 938-943; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267281
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) PET
  • 1,090 Publications and 5 Years Later: Is FAP-Targeted Theranostics Really Happening?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 177Lu-PSMA-617 Consolidation Therapy After Docetaxel in Patients with Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
  • Transarterial Radioembolization in the TACOME Trial: Dosimetric Analysis and Clinical Features in Predicting Response and Overall Survival
  • Retreatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients with 223Ra Therapy in Daily Practice
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • dosimetry
  • FAP-2286
  • fibroblast activation protein
  • PET
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire