Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleFEATURED BASIC SCIENCE ARTICLE

Interrogating the Theranostic Capacity of a MUC16-Targeted Antibody for Ovarian Cancer

Kyeara N. Mack, Zachary V. Samuels, Lukas M. Carter, Tara D. Viray, Komal Mandleywala, Cory L. Brooks, Michael A. Hollingsworth, Prakash Radhakrishnan and Jason S. Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2024, 65 (4) 580-585; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266524
Kyeara N. Mack
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
2Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachary V. Samuels
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lukas M. Carter
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tara D. Viray
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Komal Mandleywala
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cory L. Brooks
3Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Fresno, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Hollingsworth
4Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prakash Radhakrishnan
4Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason S. Lewis
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
2Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
5Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    huAR9.6 can differentiate between OC cells with high and low MUC16 expression in vitro and in vivo. (A) Radioligand cell-binding assay with [89Zr]Zr-DFO-huAR9.6 in cell lines with varying levels of MUC16 expression. Binding was significantly reduced with administration of 1,000-fold excess blocking dose of nonlabeled huAR9.6. (B) In vitro validation of huAR9.6-AF488 binding in OC cells via flow cytometry. (C) huAR9.6 immunohistochemical staining images of harvested OVCAR3, OVCAR4, OVCAR5, and OVCAR8 subcutaneous tumors. Arrow indicates MUC16 expression on surface of OVCAR5 cells. (D) Female nude mice containing subcutaneous tumors that were injected with 7.4–9.25 MBq (20–25 μg) of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-huAR9.6 followed by PET imaging. (E) Terminal biodistributions at 144 h after injection. n = 3 for OVCAR4 and OVCAR8; n = 4 for OVCAR3 and OVCAR5. *P ≤ 0.05. ***P ≤ 0.001. ****P ≤ 0.0001. %ID = percentage injected dose; FSC-A = forward scatter area; T = tumor.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    [177Lu]Lu-CHX-A″-DTPA-huAR9.6 treatment improves overall survival and inhibits tumor growth in OVCAR3-bearing mice. (A and B) Overall survival percentage (A) and TV (mm3) growth curves (B) of R2G2 OVCAR3-bearing mice after treatment. Significant tumor growth inhibition was observed in all treated mice in comparison to saline and IgG isotype controls. Shading represents 95% CI. ***P ≤ 0.001. ****P ≤ 0.0001.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    [177Lu]Lu-CHX-A″-DTPA-huAR9.6 still shows strong antitumor effects in recurrent tumors. (A) 72-h PET/CT imaging with [89Zr]Zr-DFO-huAR9.6 shows that OVCAR3 recurrent tumors still strongly express MUC16. Images are represented as maximum-intensity projections. (B) Individual TVs for recurrent OVCAR3 tumors. Mice were retreated with 9.25 MBq of [177Lu]Lu-CHX-A″-DTPA-huAR9.6 at day 75 of therapy. %ID = percentage injected dose; MIP = maximum-intensity projection; T = tumor.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Hematologic toxicity is transient in [177Lu]Lu-CHX-A″-DTPA-huAR9.6–treated mice with OVCAR3 tumors. (A–C) White blood cell counts (A), red blood cell counts (B), and platelet counts (C) in OVCAR3-bearing mice that received [177Lu]Lu-CHX-A″-DTPA-huAR9.6 treatment. Shading indicates mean ± SD of values collected from entire cohort of OVCAR3-bearing mice before therapy initiation (week 0). (D) Mean relative weight percentages for OVCAR3-bearing mice in each cohort. RBC = red blood cell; WBC = white blood cell.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 4
April 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interrogating the Theranostic Capacity of a MUC16-Targeted Antibody for Ovarian Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Interrogating the Theranostic Capacity of a MUC16-Targeted Antibody for Ovarian Cancer
Kyeara N. Mack, Zachary V. Samuels, Lukas M. Carter, Tara D. Viray, Komal Mandleywala, Cory L. Brooks, Michael A. Hollingsworth, Prakash Radhakrishnan, Jason S. Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2024, 65 (4) 580-585; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266524

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Interrogating the Theranostic Capacity of a MUC16-Targeted Antibody for Ovarian Cancer
Kyeara N. Mack, Zachary V. Samuels, Lukas M. Carter, Tara D. Viray, Komal Mandleywala, Cory L. Brooks, Michael A. Hollingsworth, Prakash Radhakrishnan, Jason S. Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2024, 65 (4) 580-585; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266524
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • RadioFlow Cytometry Reveals That [18F]FDG Uptake in K-RAS Lung Cancer Is Driven by Immune Cells: An Analysis on a Single-Cell Level
  • Comparison Between Brain and Cerebellar Autoradiography Using [18F]Flortaucipir, [18F]MK6240, and [18F]PI2620 in Postmortem Human Brain Tissue
  • Preclinical Evaluation of 226Ac as a Theranostic Agent: Imaging, Dosimetry, and Therapy
Show more FEATURED BASIC SCIENCE ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PET imaging
  • radioimmunotherapy
  • MUC16
  • huAR9.6
  • ovarian cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire