Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

The Evolution of Cardiac Nuclear Imaging

Frank M. Bengel and Marcelo F. Di Carli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2023, 64 (Supplement 2) 1S-2S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266845
Frank M. Bengel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcelo F. Di Carli
2Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Although cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide, there has been tremendous success in its treatment over the last few decades, leading to a dramatic decline in age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality (1). This success is strongly attributed to effective management of acute, deadly manifestations such as myocardial infarction (2). Although more patients survive, they enter a subsequent stage of chronic disease with an injured heart. The prevalence of chronic heart failure is rising accordingly, posing a major challenge to the cardiovascular care of the future (3).

This evolution of cardiovascular disease epidemiology is paralleled by an evolution of cardiovascular therapy. The currently available powerful armamentarium of interventional and surgical procedures, implantable devices, and antithrombotic and heart disease risk factor–modifying drugs is continuously expanded by the development and introduction of novel treatments with an ever-increasing specificity that seeks to modify selective molecular pathways or even entire systems of molecular and cellular interaction (2,4,5). The goal of such novel therapies is to enhance myocardial repair or even provide a causative modification of cardiac disease, so that—beyond the effective treatment of acute events—the development of a chronic disease state can be prevented or reversed. Similar to other fields of molecular medicine, such targeted therapies, based on, for example, antibodies, nanoparticles, RNAs, or engineered cells, will be expensive, and because of their specific nature, they are not expected to work in everybody. This emphasizes the need for effective biomarkers to implement a personalized approach toward therapy guidance. Accordingly, the quest for biomarkers in personalized medicine presents an opportunity for noninvasive imaging (4,6).

The increasing range and increasing specificity of therapeutic options in cardiology are paralleled by an increasing range and increasing specificity of diagnostic imaging options, adding another layer to the evolution of cardiovascular medicine (Fig. 1). To meet the needs of evolving disease epidemiology and evolving therapeutic diversity, imaging tests today seek to provide quantitative measures of physiology (7), seek to go beyond physiology by interrogating specific biologic mechanisms (8), and seek to go beyond the heart as a single organ by systems-based analysis of the interaction between the heart and other organs and tissues (9). The future vision is that modern cardiovascular imaging will have a profound role in providing highly effective biomarkers for personalized guidance of modern systems-based and targeted cardiovascular therapy (10). The molecular specificity and quantitative potential of radionuclide-based imaging techniques hold great promise in this regard (11). Eventually, theranostic pairs will emerge in cardiology, with a molecular imaging test providing actionable information for a matched, specific therapeutic intervention in a manner similar to concurrent approaches in oncology and to upcoming approaches in neurology and immunology (12).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Evolution of cardiovascular medicine: interplay between cardiovascular disease epidemiology, therapy, and imaging-based diagnostic tools.

This supplement of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine seeks to highlight the exciting new developments and opportunities for nuclear cardiology in the modern era of personalized cardiovascular medicine (Table 1). Di Carli shows how absolute quantification, tracers with superior kinetic properties, and integration with CT promote a transition from SPECT to PET for myocardial perfusion imaging and will therefore refine the workup of ischemic heart disease (13). Knuuti et al. then show how the principle of quantitative blood flow imaging can be taken beyond the heart to look at total-body perfusion and systemic organ interaction, by use of novel PET systems with a large axial field of view (14). Modern tracers will also enable the concomitant assessment of extracardiac disease burden and cardiac involvement in systemic disease. This is exemplified by Dorbala et al. (15) in amyloidosis, for which novel, highly effective molecular therapies have been developed, and by Kersting et al. (16) in oncology, in which the continued success of targeted therapy leads to an increasing number of surviving patients entering chronic disease states, and in which effects on cardiac health become increasingly important, promoting the subdiscipline of cardiooncology. Finally, there is increasing attention toward the role of the immune system, fibrosis, and bacterial pathogens in cardiovascular disease. Here, novel tracers may again open avenues for molecular cardiac imaging toward applications in guidance of targeted therapy, as highlighted by Thackeray et al. for immunocardiology (17), by Bengel et al. for cardiac fibrosis (18), and by Roll et al. for cardiac infection (19).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Evolution of Nuclear Cardiology

Of note, this supplement has been specifically dedicated to imaging of the myocardium as the target that is most readily visualized by molecular imaging. Valvular (20) and vessel wall (21,22) pathologies have been reviewed separately recently and provide additional opportunities that will broaden the future of cardiovascular nuclear imaging even further.

As the coordinators of this supplement, we hope that you will enjoy reading it and that it will serve as a stimulus for expansion of clinical efforts, adoption of novel techniques, and design of innovative research in this exciting field.

Footnotes

  • Published online Nov. 1, 2023.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Nabel EG,
    2. Braunwald E
    . A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:54–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hill JA,
    2. Ardehali R,
    3. Clarke KT,
    4. et al
    .; American Heart Association Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, Stroke Council. Fundamental cardiovascular research: returns on societal investment: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Res. 2017;121:e2–e8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Roger VL
    . Epidemiology of heart failure: a contemporary perspective. Circ Res. 2021;128:1421–1434.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Frantz S,
    2. Hundertmark MJ,
    3. Schulz-Menger J,
    4. Bengel FM,
    5. Bauersachs J
    . Left ventricular remodelling post-myocardial infarction: pathophysiology, imaging, and novel therapies. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:2549–2561.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. McKinsey TA,
    2. Foo R,
    3. Anene-Nzelu CG,
    4. et al
    . Emerging epigenetic therapies of cardiac fibrosis and remodelling in heart failure: from basic mechanisms to early clinical development. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;118:3482–3498.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Werner RA,
    2. Thackeray JT,
    3. Diekmann J,
    4. Weiberg D,
    5. Bauersachs J,
    6. Bengel FM
    . The changing face of nuclear cardiology: guiding cardiovascular care toward molecular medicine. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:951–961.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Di Carli MF
    . PET perfusion and flow assessment: tomorrows’ technology today. Semin Nucl Med. 2020;50:227–237.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hess A,
    2. Thackeray JT,
    3. Wollert KC,
    4. Bengel FM
    . Radionuclide image-guided repair of the heart. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:2415–2429.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cherry SR,
    2. Diekmann J,
    3. Bengel FM
    . Total-body positron emission tomography: adding new perspectives to cardiovascular research. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16:1335–1347.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Di Carli MF,
    2. Geva T,
    3. Davidoff R
    . The future of cardiovascular imaging. Circulation. 2016;133:2640–2661.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Weber WA,
    2. Czernin J,
    3. Anderson CJ,
    4. et al
    . The future of nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, and theranostics. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(suppl 2):263S–272S.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Weber WA,
    2. Barthel H,
    3. Bengel F,
    4. Eiber M,
    5. Herrmann K,
    6. Schafers M
    . What is theranostics? J Nucl Med. 2023;64:669–670.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Di Carli M
    . Future of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: transitioning from SPECT to PET. J Nucl Med. 2023;11(suppl 2):3S–10S.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Knuuti J,
    2. Tuisku J,
    3. Kärpijoki H,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative perfusion imaging with total-body PET: methodological solutions and preliminary findings. J Nucl Med. 2023;11(suppl 2):11S–19S.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Dorbala S,
    2. Kijewski MF
    . Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Amyloidosis: Recent Advances and Focus on the Future. J Nucl Med. 2023;11(suppl 2):20S–28S.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kersting D,
    2. Mavroeidi I-A,
    3. Settelmeier S,
    4. et al
    . Molecular imaging biomarkers in cardiooncology: a view on established technologies and future perspectives. J Nucl Med. 2023;11(suppl 2):29S–38S.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Thackeray JT,
    2. Lavine K,
    3. Liu Y
    . Imaging inflammation past, present, and future: focus on cardioimmunology. J Nucl Med. 2023;11(suppl 2):39S–48S.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bengel FM,
    2. Diekmann J,
    3. Hess A,
    4. Jerosch-Herold M
    . Myocardial fibrosis: emerging target for cardiac molecular imaging and opportunity for image-guided therapy. J Nucl Med. 2023;11(suppl 2):49S–58S.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Roll W,
    2. Faust A,
    3. Hermann S,
    4. Schäfers M
    . Infection imaging: focus on new tracers? J Nucl Med. 2023;11(suppl 2):59S–67S.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Tzolos E,
    2. Kwiecinski J,
    3. Berman D,
    4. Slomka P,
    5. Newby DE,
    6. Dweck MR
    . Latest advances in multimodality imaging of aortic stenosis. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:353–358.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Osborn EA,
    2. Kessinger CW,
    3. Tawakol A,
    4. Jaffer FA
    . Metabolic and molecular imaging of atherosclerosis and venous thromboembolism. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:871–877.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Slart RH,
    2. Nienhuis PH,
    3. Glaudemans A,
    4. Brouwer E,
    5. Gheysens O,
    6. van der Geest KSM
    . Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in large vessel vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:515–521.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication October 11, 2023.
  • Accepted for publication October 12, 2023.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (Supplement 2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue Supplement 2
November 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Evolution of Cardiac Nuclear Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Evolution of Cardiac Nuclear Imaging
Frank M. Bengel, Marcelo F. Di Carli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2023, 64 (Supplement 2) 1S-2S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266845

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Evolution of Cardiac Nuclear Imaging
Frank M. Bengel, Marcelo F. Di Carli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2023, 64 (Supplement 2) 1S-2S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266845
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire