Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTheranostics

Analysis of Occupational Exposure Distribution in a Nuclear Medicine Department Beginning Lutetium 177 Therapy Administration

Nicholas Onderak, Ejda Bajric, Sarah Frye, Crystal Botkin and Medhat Osman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2023, 64 (supplement 1) TS21;
Nicholas Onderak
1John Cochran VA Medical Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ejda Bajric
1John Cochran VA Medical Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Frye
2Saint Louis University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Crystal Botkin
2Saint Louis University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Medhat Osman
3St. Louis University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

TS21

Introduction: The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response curve states radiation workers should be cautious of increases in exposure as it is directly proportional to the probability of adverse effects.1 Currently of all radiation workers monitored for occupational exposure (OE), those who perform PET/CT imaging have exposure rates closer to ALARA limits.5 Theranostics has the potential to add higher OE to Nuclear Medicine Technologists (NMT).4 New therapies use Lutetium 177 (Lu177), a beta emitter with gamma component, to target tumors. Lu177 agents use sequential treatments with dosages around 200mCi per treatment.2,3 It is important to analyze OE patterns when assigning roles in the growing field of theranostics. The purpose of this study is to quantify the OE received by a NMT who is administering Lu177 versus NMTs at the same site who do not administer Lu177. This research is a single site study on OE to NMTs when adding Lu177 therapies to a general NM workload

Methods: The monthly dosimetry reports from 3 different NMT roles during 6/1/2021-6/30/2022 were utilized. These include general NMTs who did not administer Lu177 or PET radiotracers (NMT1); general NMTs who administered Lu177 therapy agents, general NM radiotracers, and not PET radiotracers (NMT2); and a NMT that administered PET radiotracers (NMT3). During this time span, NMT1 or NMT2 handled on average 167 doses/month with 3.7 Ci/month; NMT3 had on average 114 doses/month with 1.2Ci/month. The average exposure for the dominant hand and whole body (WB) was calculated using readings from Mirion TLD ring dosimeters and film badges. The Lu177 doses given each month were compared to the average OE of NMT2. A comparison was made between the NMTs OE, and the impact that individual patient doses had on the NMTs OEs to identify any differences in OE from adding Lu 177 therapies to existing workload.

Results: From the dosimetry reports, two NMTs were categorized as NMT1s, one categorized as NMT2, and three NMTs categorized as NMT3 (Table 1). The overall mean radiation exposures were calculated for the WB and dominant hand exposures of the groups. NMT1 had a WB exposure of 18mrem and a hand exposure of 52.5mrem. NMT2 received 19.6mrem and 79mrem to WB and dominant hand respectively. NMT-3 received 31.9mrem WB and 228mrem to the hand (Table 2). The data was organized into monthly averages for each group for hand and WB, and then were compared via graph (Table 3; Fig. 1). The monthly average dose activity that NMT2 administered was compared with the monthly exposure received. NMT2 administered 9 Lu177 doses with a monthly average of 127.7mCi (Table 4; Fig. 2).

Conclusions: When comparing NMT2’s averages to NMT1, a difference was seen in WB exposure, but a larger difference was seen when comparing dominant hand exposure. When comparing both groups to NMT3, NMT3 received a significantly higher OE for both WB and dominant hand (Table 2), which is expected for this role. The monthly averages for each group were also calculated and graphed. The overall trends showed that NMT3>NMT2>NMT1 for both hand and WB OE (Fig. 1). On average, NMTs that perform PET/CT imaging received the highest OE with NMT2 who administered Lu177 therapies having a slightly higher exposure than NMT1 who did not administer these therapy agents. The amount of Lu177 given each month in mCi was compared to NMT2’s monthly averages. This comparison did not indicate a correlation between activity of dose and OE (Table 4; Fig. 2). These results may indicate that in facilities where PET technologist roles are not rotated, it may be beneficial to assign Lu177 administration roles to general NMTs. Gathering additional data from higher Lu177 therapy volume facilities and analyzing workflow, as well as radiation safety practices could help clarify Lu177 administration’s contribution to OE. Further research could explore different ways for departments to rotate roles if they are considering implementing a Lu177 theranostics program.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue supplement 1
June 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analysis of Occupational Exposure Distribution in a Nuclear Medicine Department Beginning Lutetium 177 Therapy Administration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Analysis of Occupational Exposure Distribution in a Nuclear Medicine Department Beginning Lutetium 177 Therapy Administration
Nicholas Onderak, Ejda Bajric, Sarah Frye, Crystal Botkin, Medhat Osman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) TS21;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Analysis of Occupational Exposure Distribution in a Nuclear Medicine Department Beginning Lutetium 177 Therapy Administration
Nicholas Onderak, Ejda Bajric, Sarah Frye, Crystal Botkin, Medhat Osman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) TS21;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Can 177Lu-DOTATATE Kidney Absorbed Doses be Predicted from Pretherapy SSTR PET? Findings from Multicenter Data
  • Determination of the Intralesional Distribution of Theranostic 124I-Omburtamab Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
Show more Theranostics

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire