Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Basic and Translational - Technical Advances & Quantification (this would include image-guided diagnostics/therapy)

Comparison of predictive, pre-therapy MAA SPECT/CT dosimetry vs. post-therapy Y-90 PET/CT dosimetry

Karin Knesaurek, Maria DaCosta and Munir Ghesani
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P44;
Karin Knesaurek
1Mount Sinai Radiology Associates
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria DaCosta
2none
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Munir Ghesani
3Mount Sinai Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

P44

Introduction: The aim of our work is to compare predictive, pre-therapy Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT based dosimetry vs. post-therapy Y-90 PET/CT derived dosimetry in patients undergoing locoregional therapy to the liver with Y-90 microspheres.

Methods: After treatment with Y-90 microspheres 16 patients (3 female:13 male, mean age 68.2±5.3y), underwent PET/CT imaging. Images were acquired for 15 min. The low dose, non-diagnostic CT images from PET/CT were used for localization of the Y-90 microspheres and attenuation correction. The reconstruction matrix size was 200x200x75 mm and voxel size 4.07x4.07x3.00 mm. Two weeks prior to Y-90 therapy the patients also had MAA SPECT/CT performed on a dual-head Infinia SPECT/CT gamma camera (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI), with LEHR collimator and activity of 185 MBq was used. For the SPECT/CT studies, 60 views at 30 s per view were acquired and images were reconstructed using an ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm. Attenuation correction was performed using the CT scan, the reconstruc­tion matrix size was 128 × 128 and the pixel size was 4.4 mm. The CT was performed with 10mm axial sampling, 140 kVp, 2.5 mA, 2.6 rpm and with 256 × 256 matrix size. The data were reconstructed using the vendor's reconstruction software and were transferred to a common platform where the SPECT/CT and PET/CT images (Fig.1) were used to calculate Y-90 dosimetry using MIM 7.1software (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, Ohio). Local deposition method with known activity of Y-90 was used to calculate dosimetry.

Results: For 16 patients, the mean liver, tumor (T) and normal tissue (NT) doses (mean ± SD) for MAA SPECT/CT studies were, 42.02±22.36 Gy, 234.72±172.54 Gy and 41.22 ±20.37Gy, respectively. For Y-90 PET/CT studies the same values were 49.85±24.88 Gy, 314.07±197.02 Gy and 46.18 ±20.52Gy, respectively. The average differences between the liver, T and NT MAA and Y-90 doses were 18%, 25% and 15%, respectively and the linear correlation between the respective doses were r= 0.86, r= 0.71 r= 0.95, respectively.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that, post-therapy Y-90 PET/CT dosimetry average values have tendency to be slightly higher in comparison with MAA SPECT/CT dosimetry values. Also, if the catheter tip positions in MAA and Y-90 studies are positioned very similar and far from major bifurcations, the main source of differences between MAA and Y-90 dosimetry values are attributed to differences in respective ROI's. This is especially case for small, less than 10cm3, tumors, where the differences can be large. The best correlation between MAA and Y-90 dosimetry was achieved for NT, providing very good estimates for not exceeding 40 Gy guideline limit for NT in Y-90 therapies.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue supplement 1
June 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of predictive, pre-therapy MAA SPECT/CT dosimetry vs. post-therapy Y-90 PET/CT dosimetry
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of predictive, pre-therapy MAA SPECT/CT dosimetry vs. post-therapy Y-90 PET/CT dosimetry
Karin Knesaurek, Maria DaCosta, Munir Ghesani
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P44;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of predictive, pre-therapy MAA SPECT/CT dosimetry vs. post-therapy Y-90 PET/CT dosimetry
Karin Knesaurek, Maria DaCosta, Munir Ghesani
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P44;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 68Ga-pentixather PET/CT for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Comparison to 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT
  • Predicting Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy based on Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and Clinical Parameters in Locally Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Trial in Progress: Phase 1B Study of Personalized Ultrahypofractionated Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Guided by PET PSMA (Gallium 68 gozetotide PSMA-11) response [PULSAR ProPhet]
Show more Oncology, Basic and Translational - Technical Advances & Quantification (this would include image-guided diagnostics/therapy)

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire