Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportImage Generation

Impact of motion correction on longitudinal [18F]-MK6240 tau PET imaging

Amal Tiss, Thibault Marin, Kuang Gong, Cristina Lois, Yanis Chemli, Yoann Petibon, Vanessa Landes, Kira Grogg, Marc Normandin, Matthew Spangler-Bickell, J. Alex Becker, Emma Thibault, Keith Johnson, Georges El Fakhri and Jinsong Ouyang
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3277;
Amal Tiss
1Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thibault Marin
1Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kuang Gong
2Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Lois
1Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yanis Chemli
3Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, LTCI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoann Petibon
1Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vanessa Landes
4GE Healthcare
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kira Grogg
1Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Normandin
5Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Spangler-Bickell
4GE Healthcare
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Alex Becker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Thibault
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith Johnson
6Harvard MGH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georges El Fakhri
7Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinsong Ouyang
5Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3277

Introduction: PET imaging of tau deposition using [18F]-MK6240 often involves long acquisitions in older subjects, many of whom exhibit dementia symptoms. The resulting unavoidable head motion can greatly degrade image quality thus requiring motion correction (MC). Motion increases variability of PET quantitation across subjects which in turn requires larger sample sizes in clinical trials. Here, we apply an ultra-fast list-mode based motion estimation and correction method to longitudinal [18F]-MK6240 studies in a large cohort of subjects and evaluate its effect on estimated standardized uptake value ratio changes (ΔSUVR) in key brain regions involved in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We also evaluate the impact of MC on the statistical power of a hypothetical clinical trial.

Methods: Fifty-one subjects (45 Cognitively Normal (CN), 4 with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), 2 AD; age: 68 ± 11 years) were scanned on a GE Discovery MI PET/CT scanner for 20 min, 90 min after administration of ~185 MBq [18F]-MK6240. All subjects underwent a repeat scan 8 ± 4 months after their baseline scan using the same protocol. For MC, list-mode PET data were first divided into multiple short (~20 secs) frames, which were separately reconstructed into low-resolution images using the ultra-fast list-mode reconstruction provided by GE Healthcare [Spangler-Bickell et al, JNM, 2021]. Rigid registrations were then used to generate motion transformations needed to align all the frames to a selected reference image, itself registered to the attenuation map. Finally, a list-mode reconstruction incorporating the motion parameters was applied to generate a motion-corrected image. A motion metric was developed using the average displacement of voxels in the brain across all frames. A histogram-based threshold allowed us to identify the studies with important motion. We applied our approach to all 51 longitudinal [18F]-MK6240 studies and computed ΔSUVR in the entorhinal cortex, the inferior temporal gyrus, the precuneus, and the amygdala using the cerebellar gray matter as the reference region. We calculated the standard deviation of ΔSUVR across all the subjects for data reconstructed with MC and with no MC (NMC). Assuming an annualized rate of change of 10% in early-AD regions, we calculated the sample sizes (for MC and NMC) to achieve the same statistical power for differentiating between two groups (therapy vs control) for varying degrees of reduction in ΔSUVR (one-sided test, confidence level: 95%, power: 80%), in a hypothetical clinical trial.

Results: Individually, 26% of the scans exhibited notable motion, affecting 39% of the longitudinal datasets (motion in one or both time points). The motion metric was significantly higher in MCI/AD subjects than in CN subjects (p<0.05). The mean age of the moving subjects is statistically equivalent to that of the non-moving subjects (p<0.05). Visually, MC images showed substantial reduction in motion-induced blurring, especially in scans with larger motion. Images from one subject with and without MC are shown in Figure 1. MC reduced the standard deviation of ΔSUVR across subjects by -44%, -17%, -13%, and -19% in the entorhinal, inferior temporal, precuneus, and amygdala regions, respectively. In Figure 2, the sample sizes needed for rejecting the null hypothesis (i.e., no significant ΔSUVR difference between therapy and control groups) are plotted as a function of the difference in group means. MC yields lower sample sizes across all regions and its impact is more pronounced for detecting a smaller difference (e.g., resulting from shorter inter-scan duration).

Conclusions: Motion is a major confounding factor in [18F]-MK6240 tau PET imaging. Motion correction can reduce the variance in estimated ΔSUVR, potentially allowing for shorter inter-scan time and smaller sample size in clinical trials evaluating the effect of a candidate drug against AD.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of motion correction on longitudinal [18F]-MK6240 tau PET imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impact of motion correction on longitudinal [18F]-MK6240 tau PET imaging
Amal Tiss, Thibault Marin, Kuang Gong, Cristina Lois, Yanis Chemli, Yoann Petibon, Vanessa Landes, Kira Grogg, Marc Normandin, Matthew Spangler-Bickell, J. Alex Becker, Emma Thibault, Keith Johnson, Georges El Fakhri, Jinsong Ouyang
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3277;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of motion correction on longitudinal [18F]-MK6240 tau PET imaging
Amal Tiss, Thibault Marin, Kuang Gong, Cristina Lois, Yanis Chemli, Yoann Petibon, Vanessa Landes, Kira Grogg, Marc Normandin, Matthew Spangler-Bickell, J. Alex Becker, Emma Thibault, Keith Johnson, Georges El Fakhri, Jinsong Ouyang
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3277;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Quality of clinical images improved using Deep Learning Reconstruction in new digital PET-CT scanner.
  • Assessment of Optimal Uptake and Acquisition Time for [68 Ga] Ga-Pentixafor in Patients with High-grade Glioma
  • PET mapping of receptor occupancy using joint direct parametric reconstruction: in-vivo studies
Show more Image Generation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire