Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportSarcoma/Melanoma

The diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MR in N and M stages of malignant melanoma

Fangxiao Wang and Yuanfan Xu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3155;
Fangxiao Wang
1HangZhou Universal Medical Imaging Diagnostic Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuanfan Xu
1HangZhou Universal Medical Imaging Diagnostic Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3155

Introduction: To explore the value and advantages of PET/MRI in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma N staging and M staging.

Methods: The clinical and imaging data of 41 patients with malignant melanoma were retrospectively analyzed, AJCC stage II-IV, according to histopathological examination or follow-up confirmation as the gold standard, there were 28 cases of lymph node metastasis (N stage) and 18 cases of distant metastasis (M stage). The diagnostic results of PET/MR and MR in N staging and M staging of malignant melanoma patients were analyzed. The Kappa consistency test and paired χ2 test were used to evaluate the diagnostic consistency and difference between PET/MRI, MRI and the gold standard, respectively.

Results: 41 cases of melanoma, a total of 230 lesions were found, 225 lesions were detected by PET/MR, and 210 lesions were detected by MRI. The detection rate of PET/MR (97.8%) was higher than that of MRI (91.3%), but the difference was not statistically significant significance (P>0.05). PET/MRI and MRI had higher coincidence rates in the diagnosis of melanoma N stage, 100% (28/28) and 89.3% (25/28), respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05). The diagnostic coincidence rates for M staging were 94.4% (17/18) and 61.1% (11/18), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Compared with the gold standard, the diagnostic consistency of PET/MR staging is better (Kap-pa=0.857); the diagnostic consistency of MRI staging is general (Kap-pa=0.532); the two methods have statistical differences in the diagnosis of melanoma staging study meaning (P<0.05).

Conclusions: PET/MR can provide more accurate tumor staging for malignant melanoma, especially in M staging.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MR in N and M stages of malignant melanoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MR in N and M stages of malignant melanoma
Fangxiao Wang, Yuanfan Xu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3155;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MR in N and M stages of malignant melanoma
Fangxiao Wang, Yuanfan Xu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3155;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire