Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGU

Imaging Prognosis of a Negative 68Ga-PSMA-1 PET Scan on Followup Studies

William Scales and Mark Tann
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3093;
William Scales
1Indiana University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Tann
2Indiana Univ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3093

Introduction: The usage 68Ga-PSMA-11 (PSMA) PET patients for initial staging and biochemical recurrence has been shown to have high positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity.1 Few studies have evaluated at the utility of serial PSMA-PET scans in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. The goal of this study is to evaluate the imaging prognosis of patients with baseline negative PSMA-PET scans and to correlate the findings with prostate specific antigen (PSA) values at the time of imaging.

Methods: A query of all patients who have received PSMA-PET scans at IU Health since August 8, 2021 was performed. This yielded a total of 904 studies. Of these, 98 patients who had multiple PSMA-PET studies were selected for evaluation. The images, date of scans, final impressions and PSA values were used for evaluation. All studies were initially interpreted by a nuclear medicine fellowship trained radiologist. Any indeterminate impressions at the time of initial interpretation were reviewed by a fellowship trained radiologist at the time of the data analysis, and a final imaging diagnosis was determined based on follow-up imaging findings or surgical pathology. 1 patient was excluded due to an indeterminant study without follow-up imaging or pathology. 6 patients without available PSA values at the time of imaging were excluded from the PSA portion of the analysis.

Results: Of the 97 included patients, 14 never developed PSMA avid disease, 23 developed PSMA avid disease on follow-up imaging after a negative baseline, and 60 patients had positive disease at baseline. This yielded an NPV of 37.8% for a negative initial baseline study compared to follow-up studies (Table 1). Of the patients who never developed PSMA avid disease, 64.3% had a PSA of less than 0.5 and 85.7% had a PSA of less than 1 (Table 2) compared to 43.5% and 65.2% respectively in patients who developed PSMA avid disease after a negative baseline study (Table 3).

Conclusions: Based upon our findings, a negative PSMA-PET is a poor predictor of having PSMA avid disease on a follow-up exam in patients with biochemical recurrence. Additionally, although patients with a lower PSA value at baseline imaging had a lower prevalence of PSMA avid disease at baseline and on follow-up exams, it does not appear to be a good overall predictor of whether PSMA avid lesions will develop on subsequent exams.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging Prognosis of a Negative 68Ga-PSMA-1 PET Scan on Followup Studies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging Prognosis of a Negative 68Ga-PSMA-1 PET Scan on Followup Studies
William Scales, Mark Tann
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3093;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging Prognosis of a Negative 68Ga-PSMA-1 PET Scan on Followup Studies
William Scales, Mark Tann
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3093;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Diagnostic Sensitivity Between [18F]Florastamin and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the Patients with Prostate Cancer
  • Interobserver agreement for [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT images according to the E-PSMA criteria in prostate cancer patients.
  • Organ-based dosimetry of a novel albumin-binding 177Lu-PSMA agent: interim results of phase 1 clinical trial of Ludotadipep
Show more GU

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire