Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGU

Results of First Interim Analysis of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA R2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Heying Duan, Hong Song, Guido Davidzon, Farshad Moradi and Andrei Iagaru
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3082;
Heying Duan
1Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Song
1Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido Davidzon
1Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Farshad Moradi
2Department of Radiology, Stanford Univeristy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrei Iagaru
1Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3082

Introduction: Novel radiopharmaceuticals are evaluated for the diagnosis of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR PC). Here, we compare the gastrin releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) - targeting 68Ga-NeoB with the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) – targeting 68Ga-PSMA R2.

Methods: Twenty-six patients with BCR PC after initial treatment underwent both 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI and 68Ga-PSMA R2 PET/MRI within 2 weeks of each other. 68Ga-NeoB imaging started 43-77 minutes (mean±SD: 49.6±7.5) after injection of 145.1-245.6 MBq (mean±SD: 198.6±26.3). 68Ga-PSMA R2 imaging started at 44-55 minutes (mean±SD: 47.0±2.9) after injection of 108.4-228.6 MBq (mean±SD: 187.8±29.1). Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were collected for all detectable lesions. Vital signs (HR, BP) were collected before injecting the radiopharmaceuticals and after the scans. Adverse events were collected up to 24-72 hours after each scan. Scan findings where compared with follow-up imaging and tissue sampling done as standard of care.

Results: PSA ranged 0.3-13.5 ng/ml (mean±SD: 3.1±3.8) in the overall cohort. PSA ranged 0.3-6.5 ng/ml (mean±SD: 1.3±2.1) in patients with negative 68Ga-NeoB (n=8) and 0.3-13.5 ng/ml (mean±SD: 3.9±4.2 ) in patients with positive 68Ga-NeoB (n=18) (P: 0.11). PSA ranged 0.3-9.3 ng/ml (mean±SD: 2.0±3.0) in patients with negative 68Ga-PSMA R2 (n=11) and 0.3-13.5 ng/ml (mean±SD: 3.9±4.2) in patients with positive 68Ga-PSMA R2 (n=15) (P: 0.21). Differences in PSA values between negative 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA R2, as well as between positive 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA R2 were not statistically significant (P: 0.58 and 0.99, respectively).

68Ga-NeoB identified lesions in 3 patients with negative 68Ga-PSMA R2. 30 lesions in 18 patients and 20 lesions in 15 patients were detected by 68Ga-NeoB PET and 68Ga-PSMA R2 PET, respectively. The mean SUVmax ranged 2.9-13.2 (mean±SD: 6.6±3.2) for 68Ga-NeoB PET and 2.6-8.8 (mean±SD: 4.4±1.5) for 68Ga-PSMA R2 (P=0.019). 8 of the 26 patients had negative 68Ga-NeoB and negative 68Ga-PSMA R2 (no lesions identified on either scan).

There were no significant changes in vital signs before and after the scans. No adverse events were reported by the participants in the 24-72 hours period after the scans.

Conclusions: Both 68Ga-NeoB PET and 68Ga-PSMA R2 are safe radiopharmaceuticals that should continue to be evaluated for BCR PC. Identifying patients for whom these two classes of radiopharmaceuticals are complementary may ultimately allow for personalized medicine. Further evaluation in larger cohorts is needed to confirm this preliminary data.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Results of First Interim Analysis of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA R2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Results of First Interim Analysis of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA R2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Heying Duan, Hong Song, Guido Davidzon, Farshad Moradi, Andrei Iagaru
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3082;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Results of First Interim Analysis of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA R2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Heying Duan, Hong Song, Guido Davidzon, Farshad Moradi, Andrei Iagaru
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3082;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Semi-automatic Segmentation of Metastatic Tumor Load for 177Lu-PSMA Therapy
  • [68Ga]-PSMA-11 can clarify equivocal lesions on conventional imaging and change management decisions among men with previously treated prostate cancer
  • Can primary PET/CT staging using [68Ga]Ga-RM2 and [18F]Choline predict recurrence in prostate cancer?
Show more GU

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire