Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGU

Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 68Ga-NT PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: results from a prospective single-center imaging trial

Wanqian Rao, Yongxiang Tang, Bei Chen, Shijun Xiang, Zehua Zhu, Ling Xiao, Haoyue Zhu and Shuo Hu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3064;
Wanqian Rao
1Department of Nuclear Medicine (PET Center), Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha City, 410008, Hunan Province, P.R. China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongxiang Tang
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bei Chen
3Department of Nuclear Medicine (PET Center), XiangYa Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shijun Xiang
3Department of Nuclear Medicine (PET Center), XiangYa Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zehua Zhu
4XiangYa Hospital of Central South University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ling Xiao
5Department of Nuclear Medicine (PET Center), XiangYa Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haoyue Zhu
6Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuo Hu
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3064

Introduction: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is one of the most widely studied biomarkers in prostate cancer (PCa). However, the limitation of PSMA as a biomarker is its low expression in PCa tissues with low Gleason score, and tumor heterogeneity is another factor. Neurotensin receptor (NTSR) is overexpressed in non-androgen-dependent PCa tissues, as well as in neuroendocrine PCa with low PSMA expression. However, how 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-NT PET/CT could be used (or combined) in various types of PCa diagnosis has barely been investigated. We aimed to compare the preclinical data of the role of 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-NT PET/CT in initially detecting PCa.

Methods: Patients who were pathologically diagnosed with PCa underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 68Ga-NT PET/CT within 15 days as part of the prospective trial were included. Visual assessment of PET images was undertaken and standard uptake value (SUVmax) was measured for the dominant lesion per participant. Each PET scan was interpreted by three independent masked readers and a consensus majority interpretation was generated (two vs. one) to determine positive findings. Pathological specimens obtained from prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy were used as the gold standard. Because clinical and ethical standards for patient management did not allow surgery or sampling of all detected metastatic lesions, follow-up imaging (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, MRI, CT, scintigraphy) and clinical follow-up findings were used as a modified reference standard to confirm those metastatic lesions that cannot be confirmed by histopathology. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03516045.

Results: Twenty-four patients who were pathologically diagnosed with PCa were analyzed. Overall, detection rates were significantly lower with 68Ga-NT PET/CT (one [4.2%; 95%CI 0-21] of 24) than with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (21 [87.5%; 95%CI 68-97] of 24) at the patient level (Kappa=0.017, p<0.0001); in the subanalysis of primary PCa (one [4.2%; 95%CI 0-21] with 68Ga-NT PET/CT vs. 20 [83.3%; 95%CI 63-95] with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT); in the subanalysis of the nodes metastasis (none [0%; 95%CI 0-14] with 68Ga-NT PET/CT vs. seven [29.2%; 95%CI 13-51] with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT); in the subanalysis of the bone metastasis (one [4.2%; 95%CI 0-21] with 68Ga-NT PET/CT vs. four [16.7%; 5-37] with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT; Kappa=0.357, p=0.25).

Conclusions: This study confirms the higher detection rates of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT than 68Ga-NT PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer, both in detecting primary and metastatic lesions, indicating that 68Ga-NT PET/CT may not be a direct competitor or has a complimentary role of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in fully characterizing PCa with different regions.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 68Ga-NT PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: results from a prospective single-center imaging trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 68Ga-NT PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: results from a prospective single-center imaging trial
Wanqian Rao, Yongxiang Tang, Bei Chen, Shijun Xiang, Zehua Zhu, Ling Xiao, Haoyue Zhu, Shuo Hu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3064;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 68Ga-NT PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: results from a prospective single-center imaging trial
Wanqian Rao, Yongxiang Tang, Bei Chen, Shijun Xiang, Zehua Zhu, Ling Xiao, Haoyue Zhu, Shuo Hu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3064;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Semi-automatic Segmentation of Metastatic Tumor Load for 177Lu-PSMA Therapy
  • Can primary PET/CT staging using [68Ga]Ga-RM2 and [18F]Choline predict recurrence in prostate cancer?
  • Initial outcome of phase I study of Lu-177 Ludotadipep treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients
Show more GU

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire