Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGI

Impact of Y-90 glass microspheres residue measurement post-TARE using PET/CT on the tumor absorbed dose in comparison to planned dosimetry with Tc99m MAA scintigraphy.

Sarah Boughdad, Rafael DURAN, John Prior, Michael Mota, Melanie Mendes De Carvalho, Julien Costes, Silvano Gnesin and Niklaus Schaefer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3038;
Sarah Boughdad
1Lausanne University Hospital (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rafael DURAN
1Lausanne University Hospital (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Prior
2Lausanne University Hospital Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Mota
3CHUV
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melanie Mendes De Carvalho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julien Costes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvano Gnesin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niklaus Schaefer
4Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3038

Introduction: Transarterial radio-embolization (TARE) is routinely used for the treatment of non resectable liver tumor especially hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent Dosisphere-01 trial (Garin et al. 2021) showed the importance of a personalized dosimetry in HCC patients with a threshold of 205 Gy absorbed dose for the index lesion being associated with a better response rate. Yet, routine measurement of the precise activity injected during the TARE procedure are not yet standardized. In that setting, we measured the Y-90 glass microspheres residue using PET/CT after TARE to assess its impact on the tumor absorbed dose previously planned with Tc-99m-MAA scintigraphy. We also investigated which parameters might be associated with a higher Y-90 microspheres residue post-TARE.

Methods: Patients&nbsp;undergoing TARE using Y-90 glass-microspheres (TheraSphere&trade;) for non-resectable liver tumor from February 2021 to December 2021 were included in this retrospective, single-centered study. Y-90 glass microspheres &ldquo;&nbsp;residue&rdquo;&nbsp;consisting of the Theraspheres vial and the microcatheter used for the injection were imaged post-TARE on PET/CT scanner (Biograph VISION 600-Siemens). We assessed the residue post-TARE in percentage of the activity measured in the TheraSphere&trade; vial before TARE. We used t-test for dependent samples to compare perfused volume and perfused tumor absorbed doses before (as estimated on Tc99m MAA scintigraphy) and after applying the post-TARE residue. We used Mann-Whitney test to compare the value of the&nbsp;residue according to&nbsp;the type of microcatheter (Terumo Progreat 2.7Fr. Microcatheter (PG) vs ASAHI Parkway Soft 1,98 F microcatheter (AP)), the type of treatment (radiation segmentectomy versus partition) and&nbsp;the size of the perfused volume (large&nbsp;&ge;400cm3&nbsp;versus small <400 cm3). We used Anova test to compare&nbsp;the value of the&nbsp;residue according to the arterial position for&nbsp;TARE (lobar artery versus sectorial hepatic branch versus segmental hepatic branch). Pearson correlation was used to assess the association between the residue in percent and perfused volume, tumor perfused volume and the&nbsp;activity measured in the&nbsp;TheraSphere&trade; vial before TARE.

Results: Twenty-five patients (20 HCC pts) with a total of 43 injections were included. The mean value for the post-TARE residue measured on PET/CT was 92MBq±86 [2-406] corresponding to a mean percent value of 5.5%±4.5 [0.2-18.9%] in comparison to the Activity measured in the TheraSphere&trade; vial before TARE (1939MBq± 1250 [542-6269]). There were significant differences in the absorbed dose values in comparison with the planned dosimetry of Tc-99m-MAA scintigraphy&nbsp;for the perfused volume ( 270Gy±217 post-TARE versus&nbsp;290Gy±232&nbsp;; p<0.0001) and perfused tumor (375Gy±382 post-TARE versus&nbsp;395Gy±397; p=0.001). We found a borderline significant difference&nbsp;according to the type of microcatheter used during &nbsp;TARE with smaller microcatheter having higher Y90 glass microspheres &laquo;&nbsp;residu&nbsp;&raquo; values&nbsp; (6.9%±4.7 (AP) versus 4.6%±2.3 (PG) ; p=0.06). By contrast, there were no significant difference according to the type of treatment, the size of the perfused volume&nbsp;or the arterial position for TARE . Similarly, there was no significant correlation between the residue in percent with the perfused volume, the tumor perfused volume or the activity measured in the&nbsp;TheraSphere&trade; vial before TARE.

Conclusions: We reported our preliminary results measuring Y-90 glass microspheres residue post-TARE in a small cohort of patients with a mean residue below 10%. Yet, after applying&nbsp;this residue to the planned dosimetry on the Tc-99m-MAA scintigraphy we found significant differences with post-TARE absorbed doses for the perfused volume and the perfused tumor. It might have to be accounted for in patients with borderline dosimetry on the Tc-99m-MAA scintigraphy with an absorbed dose for the index lesion&nbsp;slitghly above the 205 Gy threshold. We also, found a trend for smaller microcatheter to retain higher Y-90 glass microspheres and thus&nbsp;higher&nbsp;residue.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Y-90 glass microspheres residue measurement post-TARE using PET/CT on the tumor absorbed dose in comparison to planned dosimetry with Tc99m MAA scintigraphy.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impact of Y-90 glass microspheres residue measurement post-TARE using PET/CT on the tumor absorbed dose in comparison to planned dosimetry with Tc99m MAA scintigraphy.
Sarah Boughdad, Rafael DURAN, John Prior, Michael Mota, Melanie Mendes De Carvalho, Julien Costes, Silvano Gnesin, Niklaus Schaefer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3038;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of Y-90 glass microspheres residue measurement post-TARE using PET/CT on the tumor absorbed dose in comparison to planned dosimetry with Tc99m MAA scintigraphy.
Sarah Boughdad, Rafael DURAN, John Prior, Michael Mota, Melanie Mendes De Carvalho, Julien Costes, Silvano Gnesin, Niklaus Schaefer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3038;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Head-to-head comparison between 68Ga-RM26 and 18F-FDG PET/CT in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a pilot study
  • Is Novel FAPI-PET Imaging Superior than FDG-PET Imaging for The Surveillance of Anastomotic Recurrence in Postoperative Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer?
  • Evaluation of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a prospective study!
Show more GI

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire