Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportBreast Cancer

BREAST CANCER. INCIDENCE OF NEW LESIONS DETECTED BY HIGH RESOLUTION BREAST PET WITH 18F-FDG NOT SEEN ON THE MAMMOGRAPHY

Gisela Estrada Sanchez
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2978;
Gisela Estrada Sanchez
1Imagen Tomografica y Molecular
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2978

Introduction: The American College of Radiology recommended the breast mammography as the standard method in breast cancer screening, nevertheless the incidence of breast cancer has not changed significantly in the last 10 years, despite constant awareness campaigns for women to have their mammography. The success of any screening program depends on the detection of small lesions.

High Resolution Breast PET can detect lesions measuring less than five millimeters, it is not affected by breast density or the hormonal status.

The sensitivity for High Resolution Breast PET is similar than breast MRI, but with higher specificity (92-97% vs 85-92%).

In breast cancer the metabolism of 18F-FDG is higher in malignant cells with increased uptake of the radiotracer when compared to normal tissues.

It is possible to fuse the images from the Mammography with the Breast PET using a special software.

Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the ethics committee. Patients with previous breast cancer, mother or sister with history of cancer (high risk patients) and patients with lesions in the mammography were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were patients with at least one mammography. The exclusion criteria were patients who did not have a High Resolution Breast PET. We reviewed the clinical reports of both studies from 2016 to 2019. The mammograms were read by a board certified radiologist with added qualification in breast. The Breast PET´s were read by a board certified nuclear medicine physician. The fusion of both images was performed.

Results: A total of 422 patients were included, with breast density pattern type A in 13%, type B in 62%, type C in 18% and type D in 7%. The lesions showed a concordant correlation between mammography and Breast PET in patients with breast density pattern type A and B. In patients with breast density pattern type C 23 % lesions seen on the Breast PET were not seen on the mammography and 31% of lesions in patients with breast density pattern type D.

Conclusions: High Resolution Breast PET with 18F-FDG detected 23% of malignant lesions not seen on the mammography in patients with breast density pattern type C.

High Resolution Breast PET with 18F-FDG detected 31% of malignant lesions not seen on the mammography in patients with breast density pattern type D.

High Resolution Breast PET with 18F-FDG plays an important role in clinical decision making in patients with dense breast.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
BREAST CANCER. INCIDENCE OF NEW LESIONS DETECTED BY HIGH RESOLUTION BREAST PET WITH 18F-FDG NOT SEEN ON THE MAMMOGRAPHY
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
BREAST CANCER. INCIDENCE OF NEW LESIONS DETECTED BY HIGH RESOLUTION BREAST PET WITH 18F-FDG NOT SEEN ON THE MAMMOGRAPHY
Gisela Estrada Sanchez
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2978;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
BREAST CANCER. INCIDENCE OF NEW LESIONS DETECTED BY HIGH RESOLUTION BREAST PET WITH 18F-FDG NOT SEEN ON THE MAMMOGRAPHY
Gisela Estrada Sanchez
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2978;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Diagnostic Value of F-18 FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Detection of Recurrent and Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Application of machine learning analyses using clinical and radiomic features of 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict postoperative recurrence of breast cancer
  • Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in determining recurrence in patients with triple-negative breast cancer – A retrospective study.
Show more Breast Cancer

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire