Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportDosimetry & Image Analysis

Comparison of the normal range of standardized uptake values between 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in breast cancer patient

Ashish Jha, Sneha Mithun, Amit Nautiyal, Viraj Sawant, Ravi Chauhan, Manojkumar Chauhan and VENKATESH RANGARAJAN
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2818;
Ashish Jha
1Tata Memorial Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sneha Mithun
1Tata Memorial Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amit Nautiyal
2Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Navi Mumbai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viraj Sawant
3Tmc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ravi Chauhan
4Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer center and HBCH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manojkumar Chauhan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VENKATESH RANGARAJAN
5TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, MUMBAI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2818

Introduction: For many years, 99mTc-MDP bone scans have been used to evaluate skeletal metastasis in oncology. In recent years, the 18F-NaF bone scan has also been used to identify skeletal metastases. Specifically, skeletal metastasis is qualitatively assessed in 99mTc-MDP bone scans, whereas 18F-NaF bone scans have been evaluated qualitatively as well as quantitatively based on SUV values. With the recent introduction of 99mTc-MDP SPECT SUV by many vendors, SPECT has been able to be quantitatively assessed based on SUV. Our study compares the normal axial bone SUVs measured by 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT to those measured by 18F-NaF PET/CT.

Methods: This study used 120 in carcinoma breast patients' data who underwent pretreatment 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT (60 patients) and 18F-NaF PET/CT (60 patients) with normal BMI and had no skeletal metastases. The 99mTc MDP study was performed on the Discovery NM/CT 670 Pro SPECT/CT; GE Healthcare and the 18F-NaF scan was performed on the Gemini TF64 PET/CT, Philips Electronics. Volumetrix MI from GE Healthcare was used to perform quantitative reconstruction of SPECT images by applying scatter and attenuation corrections and collimator response corrections. SUV maximum (SUVmax) is measured at the normal site of the axial bones: skull, scapula, sternum, ribs, cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, pelvis, humerus, and femur. Three ROIs (region of interest) of 2 cm diameter each were drawn on each normal bone to obtain three measurements. The mean and standard deviation of SUVmax was calculated for all normal bones for both modalities. To compare SUVmax obtained by PET and SPECT, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: For most of the bone sites, the SUVmax were comparable for both modalities (table 1 & figure 1). For PET scans, the minimum and maximum SUVmax values were 12.56 (±3.54) (cervical spine) and 3,30(±1.30) (humerus), respectively. For SPECT, the values were 12.65 (±3.89) (Thoracic spine) and 2.98 (±1.28) (humerus). Six of the 10 boney sites did not have significant difference p-values>0.05 (table 1).

Table 1: This table presents the means and SD of normal bone SUVmax, along with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test p-values for each skeletal site.

Conclusions: 99mTc-MDP SPECT SUV measurements can be an effective way to assess skeletal metastasis quantitatively. Our study shows that SUVmax calculated by PET or SPECT for normal bone is comparable. We did not compare the SUV values for skeletal metastases assessed on SPECT and PET in this investigation, which is one of its limitations.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of the normal range of standardized uptake values between 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in breast cancer patient
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of the normal range of standardized uptake values between 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in breast cancer patient
Ashish Jha, Sneha Mithun, Amit Nautiyal, Viraj Sawant, Ravi Chauhan, Manojkumar Chauhan, VENKATESH RANGARAJAN
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2818;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of the normal range of standardized uptake values between 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in breast cancer patient
Ashish Jha, Sneha Mithun, Amit Nautiyal, Viraj Sawant, Ravi Chauhan, Manojkumar Chauhan, VENKATESH RANGARAJAN
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2818;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Intra- and Inter-operator variability in manual tumor segmentation: Impact on radionuclide therapy dosimetry
  • Repeat PET/CT Imaging of a Patient with Systemic Amyloidosis Using iodine (124I) evuzamitide (124I-p5+14) Identifies Organ-Specific Amyloid Regression
  • Role of NaF-PET/CT in detecting age-associated changes in the trabecular bone metabolism
Show more Dosimetry & Image Analysis

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire