Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportBreast Cancer

The application of 18F-FDG PET/MR in postoperative metastasis and restaging of breast cancer

Shuai Yun and Yuanfan Xu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2593;
Shuai Yun
1HangZhou Universal Medical Imaging Diagnostic Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuanfan Xu
1HangZhou Universal Medical Imaging Diagnostic Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2593

Introduction: To explore the value of 18F-FDG PET/MR systemic imaging in postoperative metastasis detection and restaging of breast cancer.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of PET/MR, PET/CT imaging in 94 patients with breast cancer after surgery. On the same day, the whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and PET/MR imaging were performed. The differences in detection rate and restaging between the two devices were compared with pathology and clinical diagnosis as the gold standard.

Results: In 94 patients with postoperative breast cancer, 51 patients with metastasis were found, with a total of 469 lesions, including 210 lymph node metastases, 35 lung and pleural metastases, 30 intrahepatic metastases, 11 intracerebral metastases, 5 adrenal metastases and 178 bone metastases. The detection rate of lymph node and adrenal metastasis by the two devices is consistent. PET/MR found 56 more metastases than PET/CT in 28 patients, with significant statistical differences (χ2=28.86, P<0.01); 20 lesions were PET-MR positive but PET-CT was negative, including 5 brain metastases and 15 liver metastases; In 36 lesions, PET intake was negative on both devices, but MR was diagnosed with metastasis, including 4 brain metastases, 5 liver metastases and 27 bone metastases. The detection rate of PET/MR for liver, brain and bone metastasis is significantly higher than that of PET/CT (χ2=30.00, 18.33, 29.22, P<0.01). PET/CT found 20 more lesions than PET/MR, with significant statistical differences(χ2=28.00, P<0.01), all of which were pulmonary metastasis; In 35 and medium-medium lung and pleural metastases, 10 lesions had obvious FDG uptake, 22 lesions had no significant uptake, and 3 pulmonary metastases were positive in PET-MR, while PET-CT showed Negative. Through PET/MR examination, 15 patients changed the staging of PET/CT, with significant statistical differences (χ2=16.30, P<0.01).

Conclusions: PET/MR has high value for postoperative metastasis and restaging of breast cancer. The detection rate for craniocerebral, liver and bone metastases is higher than PET/CT. Pulmonary lesions still need CT-assisted diagnosis.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The application of 18F-FDG PET/MR in postoperative metastasis and restaging of breast cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The application of 18F-FDG PET/MR in postoperative metastasis and restaging of breast cancer
Shuai Yun, Yuanfan Xu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2593;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The application of 18F-FDG PET/MR in postoperative metastasis and restaging of breast cancer
Shuai Yun, Yuanfan Xu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2593;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in triple-negative breast cancer – A retrospective observational study from a tertiary care center in India.
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT for response evaluation in metastatic breast cancer treated with Palbociclib containing regimen: Can it alter the course of management?
  • The Diagnostic Value of F-18 FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Detection of Recurrent and Metastatic Breast Cancer
Show more Breast Cancer

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire