Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGU

Percutaneous transgluteal Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT guided prostate biopsy: Is it the future?

Rajender Kumar, Bhagwant Mittal, Shrawan Kumar Singh, Harmandeep Singh and Anish Bhattacharya
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2542;
Rajender Kumar
1Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bhagwant Mittal
2PGIMER, Chandigarh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shrawan Kumar Singh
3Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harmandeep Singh
3Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anish Bhattacharya
4POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH (PGIMER)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2542

Introduction: Prostatic cancer is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. A trans-rectal ultra-sonographic guided biopsy from the prostate is done to establish a pathological diagnosis in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or increased serum PSA levels having a sensitivity of 39-52% even after rebiopsy. Moreover, a higher number of cores is associated with higher morbidity. Ga-68 PSMA-PET/CT has documented role in staging and follow-up evaluation of prostate cancer. The study was planned to evaluate the PSMA-PET/CT-guided biopsy from a PSMA-expressing prostatic lesion through the trans-gluteal approach to avoid the rectal penetration.

Methods: In the present study, we prospectively recruited patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (serum PSA >4ng/dl), either biopsy-naïve or negative TRUS-guided biopsy. All the patients underwent whole-body Ga-68 PSMA-PET/CT-imaging. Two qualified nuclear medicine physicians reviewed PET/CT imaging. A focal PSMA avid lesion in the prostate was considered PET-positive. No or inhomogenous PSMA expression was considered as PET negative. The PET-positive patients underwent PET-guided prostatic biopsies through the trans-gluteal approach using an automated-robotic arm to place the needle to target prostatic lesions. Society of interventional radiology consensus guidelines was followed for the procedures. The location of tracer uptake in the prostate, SUVmax, miPSMA score, visual analysis score (VAS) for pain, procedure-related complication, and histopathology were documented. Urine culture reports at 48 hours after the procedure was also evaluated.

Results: A total of 96 patients (biopsy-naïve 52; TRUS-GB 44) were enrolled. In these patients, the mean PSA level was 18.0 ±13.3 (range 4.3-59.7) ng/dl). Of these, 72/96 (75%) patients were PET-positive with mean SUV max 19.1 ±13.9. Of them, 43 were biopsy-naïve, and 29 had negative TRUS guided biopsy. The lesions were located anteriorly in 20, posteriorly in 12, laterally in 30 and central in 8 patients. All the PET-positive patients underwent PET/CT-guided prostatic biopsy. Biopsy was technically feasible in 70/72 procedures, and retrieved specimens were adequate for pathological analysis. Two patients had a non-representative sample and a repeat biopsy was done, which demonstrated representative specimen. Histopathology demonstrated prostate cancer in 70 patients and chronic prostatitis in the remaining two patients. The procedure demonstrated a diagnostic yield of 100%. In the TRUS-GB group, 29/44 patients had prostate cancer and 8/29 (27%) had clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7). Minor complications (hematuria, hematospermia and gluteal pains) were noted in ten patients. Non of the patient required hospital admission. The mean VAS was 2.5 ±1.8 (> 5 in six). A statistically significant correlation was noted between SUVmax and miPSMA score (rho= 0.765; P<0.0001), PSA and miPSMA-score (0.484; P=0.0004), as well as PSA and SUVmax of the lesion (rho= 0.475; P=0.0006). The intensity of pain was not related to the depth of the lesion (rho= -0.129; P=0.37). None of the patients developed fever or post-procedural infection.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that transgluteal PSMA PET/CT-guided prostatic biopsy is feasible, safe, and has excellent diagnostic yield. This approach is highly practical in patients with prior negative TRUS-guided biopsies. It also negates the chance of inoculation of the prostate with rectal flora, thus reducing the morbidity due to bacterial infection. The findings pave the way for use of PSMA-PET/CT and guided prostate biopsy for early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Moreover, the potential risk of Covid-19 cross-infection with TRUS-GB due to fecal contamination can be avoided by this approach.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Percutaneous transgluteal Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT guided prostate biopsy: Is it the future?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Percutaneous transgluteal Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT guided prostate biopsy: Is it the future?
Rajender Kumar, Bhagwant Mittal, Shrawan Kumar Singh, Harmandeep Singh, Anish Bhattacharya
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2542;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Percutaneous transgluteal Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT guided prostate biopsy: Is it the future?
Rajender Kumar, Bhagwant Mittal, Shrawan Kumar Singh, Harmandeep Singh, Anish Bhattacharya
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2542;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PET-derived total tumor volume in the course of 225Ac-PSMA radioligand therapy in advanced mCRPC
  • Early Lu-177 PSMA Radioligand Therapy in Metastatic Non-castrate or Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Results
  • Semi-automatic Segmentation of Metastatic Tumor Load for 177Lu-PSMA Therapy
Show more GU

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire