Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

18F-4FMFES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Endometrial Carcinomas: Preliminary Report

Michel Paquette, Esteban Espinosa-Bentancourt, Éric Lavallée, Serge Phoenix, Korine Lapointe-Milot, Paul Bessette, Brigitte Guérin and Éric E. Turcotte
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 702-707; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262617
Michel Paquette
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esteban Espinosa-Bentancourt
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Éric Lavallée
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge Phoenix
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Korine Lapointe-Milot
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Bessette
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brigitte Guérin
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Éric E. Turcotte
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    (A) Qualitative maximum-intensity-projection whole-body assessment of effect of pharmacologic interventions to slow progression of radioactive intestinal bolus. Without use of any intervention (left panel), 18F-4FMFES PET typically produces intense abdominal uptake caused by progression of radiometabolites excreted by gallbladder in intestines. Ingestion of 4 mg of loperamide 15 min before injection of radiotracer yielded mitigated results (center panel). Repeated intravenous injection of 20 mg of hyoscine N-butylbromide at 0, 20, and 40 min after 18F-4FMFES injection apparently reduced lower-abdomen background and slowed transit of radioactive intestinal bolus (right panel). (B) Measured volume extracted from application of SUV threshold of >4 on abdominal ROI. Both use of loperamide and use of hyoscine N-butylbromide significantly reduced intestinal background volume. **P < 0.01. ****P < 0.001.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Representative case of endometrial carcinoma (arrows) imaged with 18F-FDG PET/CT (top row) and 18F-4FMFES PET/CT (bottom row), displayed in frontal maximum-intensity projection (MIP) and in sagittal views.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    A 69-y-old endometroid adenocarcinoma patient with 18F-FDG–negative, 18F-4FMFES–positive primary tumor. 18F-FDG PET did not yield any abnormal uptake in uterus, whereas 18F-4FMFES PET revealed intense signal (SUVmax, 9.6; arrows) over 44 × 32 × 25 mm region. Postsurgery pathology report measured size of tumor to be 20 mm in its long axis, meaning 18F-4FMFES overestimated size of tumor in this case.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    A 75-y-old endometroid adenocarcinoma patient with 18F-FDG false-positive inguinal node. (A) Endometroid adenocarcinoma primary tumor, with SUVmax uptake of 12.3 for 18F-FDG and 8.9 for 18F-4FMFES (black arrows). The 18F-FDG PET also revealed a suspected right inguinal node metastasis (red arrow), which yielded SUVmax of 5.2 (T/B, 7.2). (B) Transaxial slices of the suspected inguinal node metastasis (red arrows). The 18F-FDG–positive node was 18F-4FMFES–negative and of normal appearance in CT image. Pathology examination considered inguinal node as normal, meaning 18F-FDG signal was false-positive.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    A 67-y-old endometrial carcinoma patient with 18F-4FMFES false-positive iliac node. (A) Endometrial carcinoma primary tumor, with SUVmax uptake of 12.9 for 18F-FDG and 12.7 for 18F-4FMFES (arrows). (B) Coronal (top) and transaxial (bottom) views centered on suspected left iliac sentinel node metastasis with 18F-4FMFES (arrows), which was of normal aspect in CT images. Pathology examination after surgery considered iliac node normal, confirming false-positive result for 18F-4FMFES.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Semiquantitative 18F-FDG and 18F-4FMFES uptake and T/Bs. (A) 18F-FDG and 18F-4FMFES uptake (SUVmax) for whole sample (left) and according to grade (right) (B) 18F-FDG and 18F-4FMFES T/Bs for whole studied sample (left) and according to grade (right). (C) 18F-FDG and 18F-4FMFES T/Bs according to grade. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. ****P < 0.001.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Patient Characteristics

    ParameterData
    Patients (n)25
    Mean age ± SD (y)63.4 ± 10.5 (median, 66; range, 41–79)
    Premenopausal (n)4
    Postmenopausal (n)21
    Histology (n)
     Endometrial carcinoma23
     Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia2
    Grade (n)
     15
     212
     38
    Treatment (n)
     Loperamide (4 mg)12
     Hyoscine N-butylbromide (3 × 20 mg)11
     None2 (plus 31 breast cancer patients (23))
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 5
May 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-4FMFES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Endometrial Carcinomas: Preliminary Report
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-4FMFES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Endometrial Carcinomas: Preliminary Report
Michel Paquette, Esteban Espinosa-Bentancourt, Éric Lavallée, Serge Phoenix, Korine Lapointe-Milot, Paul Bessette, Brigitte Guérin, Éric E. Turcotte
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 702-707; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262617

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-4FMFES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Endometrial Carcinomas: Preliminary Report
Michel Paquette, Esteban Espinosa-Bentancourt, Éric Lavallée, Serge Phoenix, Korine Lapointe-Milot, Paul Bessette, Brigitte Guérin, Éric E. Turcotte
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 702-707; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262617
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • endometrial carcinoma
  • 18F-4FMFES
  • abdominal background
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire