Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Biodistribution of 18F-FES in Patients with Metastatic ER+ Breast Cancer Undergoing Treatment with Rintodestrant (G1T48), a Novel Selective ER Degrader

Ramsha Iqbal, Maqsood Yaqub, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Yeukman Liu, Anne Marije Luik, Andy P. Beelen, Robert C. Schuit, Albert D. Windhorst, Ronald Boellaard and Catharina W. Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 694-699; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262500
Ramsha Iqbal
1Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maqsood Yaqub
2Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
2Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yeukman Liu
1Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Marije Luik
1Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andy P. Beelen
3G1 Therapeutics Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert C. Schuit
2Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert D. Windhorst
2Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Boellaard
2Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catharina W. Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
1Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Venous blood sampling data of all patients obtained at the 3 different time points. (A) SUV whole blood data. (B) Plasma-to-whole blood ratios. (C) Parent fraction of 18F-FES in plasma. Data represent median of all values, with their corresponding IQRs.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Tracer uptake in blood pool of each patient at 3 different time points. Whole blood calibrated with venous samples (A), plasma (B), and metabolite-corrected plasma (C) input curves. All curves have been corrected for administered dose and weight. At time of progression, patients were scanned ≤2 d (blue curves) or ≥6 d (green curves) after EoT. * P < 0.05

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Visual assessment of 18F-FES uptake in various healthy tissues in 1 patient at baseline (A), interim (B), and after treatment (C). This patient underwent interim scanning 10 d after EoT. Uterus, an ER-expressing organ, is not visible in these images as it is located behind bladder. Images are maximal-intensity projections.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    SUV time–activity curves (derived from dynamic scans) for various healthy tissue regions ([A] breast, [B] liver, [C] muscle, [D] bone. and [E] lung) of all patients at 3 different time points. Curves represent median of all values, with their corresponding IQRs.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 5
May 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biodistribution of 18F-FES in Patients with Metastatic ER+ Breast Cancer Undergoing Treatment with Rintodestrant (G1T48), a Novel Selective ER Degrader
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Biodistribution of 18F-FES in Patients with Metastatic ER+ Breast Cancer Undergoing Treatment with Rintodestrant (G1T48), a Novel Selective ER Degrader
Ramsha Iqbal, Maqsood Yaqub, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Yeukman Liu, Anne Marije Luik, Andy P. Beelen, Robert C. Schuit, Albert D. Windhorst, Ronald Boellaard, Catharina W. Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 694-699; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262500

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biodistribution of 18F-FES in Patients with Metastatic ER+ Breast Cancer Undergoing Treatment with Rintodestrant (G1T48), a Novel Selective ER Degrader
Ramsha Iqbal, Maqsood Yaqub, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Yeukman Liu, Anne Marije Luik, Andy P. Beelen, Robert C. Schuit, Albert D. Windhorst, Ronald Boellaard, Catharina W. Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 694-699; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262500
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-FES
  • PET
  • estrogen receptor
  • breast cancer
  • biodistribution
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire