Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPoster - Educational Exhibits

Clinical Readout Assessment for Nuclear Medicine Residents

Paige Bennett, Jennifer Schroeder, Anita Thomas, Jean-Luc Urbain and Kathryn Morton
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 2059;
Paige Bennett
1Wake Forest University Health Sciences Winston-Salem NC United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Schroeder
1Wake Forest University Health Sciences Winston-Salem NC United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita Thomas
1Wake Forest University Health Sciences Winston-Salem NC United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Luc Urbain
1Wake Forest University Health Sciences Winston-Salem NC United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn Morton
2Radiology University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2059

Objectives: Mini-clinical exam formats for formative and summative learning have been in common use since the 1990s in medical schools. Now used in many different medical specialty training programs, the mini-clinical exam is an observed clinical encounter involving a faculty evaluator and a trainee who performs the clinical duties. This observed encounter utilizes a rubric format to evaluate clinical performance and promote learning. In nuclear medicine, the trainee’s clinical work includes image interpretation, diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic procedures. However, graduate medical education in nuclear medicine lacks evidence-based sources for formative and summative assessments of trainee learning. Our group is interested in developing a mini-clinical assessment tool for nuclear medicine trainees to enhance our field’s educational objectives. We are especially interested in an assessment for use with image interpretation skills of residents, as this is a nebulous area of nuclear medicine education, feedback, and assessment.

Methods: Using a rubric format, we developed an image interpretation evaluation tool that encompasses the following skills or knowledge base: radiopharmaceutical, biodistribution, imaging protocol, indication and clinical context, findings, reporting, and conclusion. Specific skills or knowledge were each categorized as beginner, intermediate, or senior level.

Results: The NM Standardized Readout Assessment tool is presented in Table 1. Note that this form has four pages. Page 1: Trainee, evaluator and case-specific information. Page 2: Clinical image interpretation exam. Page 3: Trainee and evaluator comments regarding learning achievements and areas for development. Page 4: Trainee and evaluator opinions regarding the exercise, including acceptability of the assessment.

Conclusions: With specific skill and knowledge criteria and precise scoring categories, we provide a formative learning tool that can provide feedback and identify trainee knowledge gaps as well as a summative assessment tool that evaluates trainee performance in image interpretation. We expect this to have a positive impact on trainees and encourage learning and professional development.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Readout Assessment for Nuclear Medicine Residents
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Clinical Readout Assessment for Nuclear Medicine Residents
Paige Bennett, Jennifer Schroeder, Anita Thomas, Jean-Luc Urbain, Kathryn Morton
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 2059;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical Readout Assessment for Nuclear Medicine Residents
Paige Bennett, Jennifer Schroeder, Anita Thomas, Jean-Luc Urbain, Kathryn Morton
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 2059;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Poster - Educational Exhibits

  • "Change With The Times": The Practice of Nuclear Medicine in the Time of Climate Change
  • We should be careful, activity in mCi or MBq doesn’t really measure what we want it to measure.
  • Brain-related complications of COVID-19 and the role of FDG-PET in detecting vascular and non-vascular defects throughout the body
Show more Poster - Educational Exhibits

Professional Development and Quality Improvement

  • "No Hard Feelings": Empathy Training for Nuclear Medicine Technologists: A Review and Methods of Improvement During the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • "Day or Night": The Sundown Syndrome and Performance of Nuclear Medicine Studies During the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • "Getting Along": The Utilization of the Myers-Briggs Model in the Nuclear Medicine Department
Show more Professional Development and Quality Improvement

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire