Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPoster - PhysicianPharm

TOPAS Simulations for Estimating Cyclotron-Based Production Yield of Vanadium-48

Brittany Broder, Richard Freifelder, Anna Kucharski, Mohammed Bhuiyan, Amy Renne, Jerry Nolen and Chin-Tu Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1197;
Brittany Broder
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Freifelder
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Kucharski
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed Bhuiyan
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Renne
2Argonne National Laboratory Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerry Nolen
2Argonne National Laboratory Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chin-Tu Chen
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1197

Objectives: While many medical cyclotrons do not have a solid target system, they often have components that can be manipulated to allow for the irradiation of solid targets, such as placing thin foils in a beamstop. Previous research has used such a setup to produce vanadium-48for colorectal cancer imaging [1]. Due to its long half-life, 48Valso has potential application in long-term monitoring and longitudinal studies of biological and physiological interest. [2] Due to the inexact nature of the makeshift solid target system, several parameters contributing to the activity yield are often unknown. In this study, we simulate the makeshift solid target system via TOPAS, a Geant4-based Monte Carlo program for proton and heavy ion simulations, to investigate how beam characteristics and target properties impact the activity produced. The simulated values are compared to experimental results of activity yield when irradiating thin, natural titanium foils. Methods: Experimentally, 12 µm natural titanium foils were irradiated with 18 MeV protons via an IBA 18/9 Cyclone at 10 or 20 µA for 1 hour; this was repeated with various target geometries. In simulation, beam properties were chosen using values from the literature for the IBA 18/9 Cyclone and 18 MeV protons [2]. Resulting beam width was estimated using a detector panel at the target position and measuring the energy deposited. Several physics lists were used to predict cross sections and the corresponding production rates for the reaction. To assess the cross section, a stack of natural titanium foils was simulated separately with thicknesses such that 1 MeV was lost per foil. The number of 48V ions generated in each foil was measured and converted to cross section. To assess activity yielded, 12 µm natural titanium foils and their geometries were simulated being irradiated by 108 18 MeV protons. The number of ions generated in each foil was recorded and converted to radioactive yield. All simulations were repeated ten times with different seed numbers and summed. Results: Cross sections were obtained from: 1) TENDL (a theoretical calculation of the 48Ti(p,n)48V reaction [3]), 2) EXFOR (experimental results [4]), and those generated in simulation using TOPAS, 3) default physics list and the 4) QBBC physics list, chosen based on the literature. At lower energies, the default list (#3) produces results comparable to EXFOR, while the QBBC list (#4) overestimates the cross sections. At higher energies, TOPAS overestimates the cross section for both physics lists. In comparing radioactive yields generated in simulation and experimentally by irradiating flat foils at 18 MeV, the simulated activity for a single foil with 10 µA current was similar to experimental values, differing by 10% when using the TOPAS default physics list and by 17% for the QBBC list. Similarly, the experimental activity from irradiating a foil at 20 µA differed by 16% with the default physics list and 24% with the QBBC list. This difference is due to the differing cross sections for each of these lists at 18 MeV. Conclusion: TOPAS provides a reasonable estimate of radioactivity generated by cyclotron-based irradiation of natural titanium foils. While an apparent over-estimation of the cross section for commonly used physics lists limits the possibility of construing an exact radioactivity measurement, this tool can be used to estimate the radioactivity in order to guide experiments and inform experimental outcomes.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
TOPAS Simulations for Estimating Cyclotron-Based Production Yield of Vanadium-48
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
TOPAS Simulations for Estimating Cyclotron-Based Production Yield of Vanadium-48
Brittany Broder, Richard Freifelder, Anna Kucharski, Mohammed Bhuiyan, Amy Renne, Jerry Nolen, Chin-Tu Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1197;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
TOPAS Simulations for Estimating Cyclotron-Based Production Yield of Vanadium-48
Brittany Broder, Richard Freifelder, Anna Kucharski, Mohammed Bhuiyan, Amy Renne, Jerry Nolen, Chin-Tu Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1197;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Poster - PhysicianPharm

  • Preliminary result of Texture Analysis on prediction of overall outcome of neuroendocrine tumors based on pre-therapy heterogeneity of somatostatin receptors on 68Ga Dotatate PET/CT scans.
  • Diagnostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitative imaging with CZT SPECT in patients with high-risk coronary artery disease
  • Comparative of IQ-SPECT, LEHR-SPECT, DE-MRI in evaluating left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion
Show more Poster - PhysicianPharm

Automation & Technology Development

  • Assessment of Production Reactions to Achieve High Radiological Purity Tb-155
  • Fully automated, commercial cassette-based production of high-purity [64Cu]CuCl2 from solid Ni target
  • Using Acoustophoresis Cell Washing In The Immune Cell Radiolabeling Procedure
Show more Automation & Technology Development

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire