Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

First-in-Humans Study of the SSTR Antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Dosimetry, Safety, and Efficacy

Richard P. Baum, Jingjing Zhang, Christiane Schuchardt, Dirk Müller and Helmut Mäcke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2021, 62 (11) 1571-1581; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.258889
Richard P. Baum
1Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany;
2CURANOSTICUM Wiesbaden-Frankfurt, Center for Advanced Radiomolecular Precision Oncology, Wiesbaden, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingjing Zhang
1Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany;
3Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Surgery, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore;
4Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christiane Schuchardt
1Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dirk Müller
1Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helmut Mäcke
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Representative planar whole-body anterior and posterior scintigraphic images of patient with pancreatic NEN liver metastases at various times after intravenous administration of 5.3 GBq of 177Lu-DOTA-LM3. Intense tumor uptake in liver metastases (arrows) was observed, as well as pulmonary uptake (at 0.5 and 2.5 h) and significant uptake in kidneys, spleen, and liver (at 0.5, 2.5, 19.5, 44.0, and 68.5 h). ANT = anterior; POST = posterior.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Biodistribution, effective half-life, and mean absorbed organ and tumor doses of 177Lu-DOTA-LM3. Longest effective half-life was obtained in metastases. Spleen had highest absorbed dose of all analyzed normal organs. Higher uptake, longer effective half-life, and higher mean absorbed doses in liver metastases than in bone lesions were observed. All results showed high variability, as demonstrated by error bars, which represent SD. p.i. = after injection.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    (A) Comparison of biodistribution and dosimetry results of antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 (n = 11) and agonist 177Lu-DOTATOC (n = 247). Higher uptake and longer effective half-life were found for 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 in whole body as well as kidneys, spleen, and metastases, resulting in higher mean absorbed organ and tumor doses for 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 than for 177Lu-DOTATOC. (B) Example of 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 and 177Lu-DOTATOC in same patient. p.i. = after injection.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    (A–D) Comparison of hemoglobin (A), leukocyte count (B), platelet count (C), and neutrophil count (D) before and after 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT. (E and F) Comparison of serum creatinine (E) and renal function quantified by measuring tubular extraction rate using 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scintigraphy (F) before and after 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT, which did not reveal any significant nephrotoxicity.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    A 55-y-old man with well-differentiated, nonfunctioning metastatic pancreatic NEN and Ki-67 index of 13%. Patient underwent Whipple procedure, with histologically confirmed G2 pancreatic NEN. MRI had revealed multiple small-volume liver metastases. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT showed weakly 68Ga-DOTATATE–avid small-volume lesions in liver and lymph nodes with extremely low uptake (leftmost image), which did not exhibit significant glucose hypermetabolism (second image from left). 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT then showed disseminated bilobar liver metastases, demonstrating intense SSTR antagonist (LM3) uptake in liver and lymph node metastases (third image from left). Patient was treated with 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT, with cumulative administered radioactivity of 25.7 GBq. Restaging 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT showed excellent response to 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT, with partial remission of disease according to RECIST and EORTC criteria (rightmost image).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Demographic and Baseline Clinical Characteristics of Patients with NENs (n = 51)

    CharacteristicData
    Sex
     Male33 (64.7%)
     Female18 (35.3%)
    Age, mean ± SD (y)51.6 ± 13.9
    Primary tumor site
     Cancer of unknown primary (CUP)7 (13.7%)
     Pancreas13 (25.5%)
     Midgut15 (29.4%)
     Rectum3 (5.9%)
     Lung4 (7.8%)
     Other9 (17.6%)
    Functional vs. nonfunctional
     Functional NEN26 (51.0%)
     Nonfunctional NEN25 (49.0%)
    Ki-67 index grading
     G1 (Ki-67 < 3%)14 (27.5%)
     G2 (Ki-67 = 3%–20%)27 (52.9%)
     G3 (Ki-67 > 20%)10 (19.6%)
    Primary treatment before PRRT
     Surgery36 (70.6%)
     Somatostatin analog32 (62.7%)
     Chemotherapy11 (21.6%)
     Liver-directed therapy12 (23.5%)
      TACE7 (13.7%)
      SIRT (radioembolization)2 (3.9%)
      Other3 (5.9%)
     Everolimus7 (13.7%)
     External-beam radiotherapy8 (15.7%)
    Previously treated with 177Lu-DOTATOC/TATE PRRT
     Yes35 (68.6%)
     No (PRRT-naïve patients)16 (31.4%)
    • Data are number followed by percentage in parentheses, except for age.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Treatment Cycles and Cumulative Administered Radioactivity for 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT (n = 51)

    Cumulative radioactivity (GBq)
    Variablen%MeanSD
    No. of 177Lu-LM3 PRRT cycles51100
     12549.06.10.8
     21529.411.42.1
     3713.719.41.1
     447.826.01.2
    No. of 177Lu-LM3 PRRT cycles in patients previously treated with TOC/TATE PRRT3568.6
     12549.06.10.8
     2611.810.91.5
     335.918.81.2
     412.025.6/
    No. of 177Lu-LM3 PRRT cycles in PRRT-naïve patients1631.4
     2917.612.02.5
     347.819.90.8
     435.926.11.4
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Hematotoxicity and Nephrotoxicity Before and After 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT According to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0

    AnemiaLeukocytopeniaThrombocytopeniaLymphopeniaNeutropeniaNephrotoxicity
    GradeBeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfter
    CTC-1101825699151267
    CTC-2651310850242
    CTC-3000003140000
    CTC-4000000000000
    CTC-5NA0NA0NA0NA0NA0NA0
    • NA = not applicable before 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT (grade 5 represents death).

    • Data are numbers of patients.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Treatment Response at 3–6 Months After 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT

    Total (n = 47) PRRT-naïve (n = 14)Previously treated with TOC/TATE PRRT (n = 33)
    Responsen%n%n%
    RECIST CT or MRI response
     Complete response000000
     Partial response1736.21071.4721.2
     Stable disease2348.9321.42060.6
     Progressive disease714.917.1618.2
     Disease control rate4085.11392.92781.8
    EORTC SSTR imaging response
     Complete response24.317.113.0
     Partial response2144.7964.31236.4
     Stable disease1838.3321.41545.5
     Progressive disease612.817.1515.2
     Disease control rate4187.21392.92884.8
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 11
November 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
First-in-Humans Study of the SSTR Antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Dosimetry, Safety, and Efficacy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
First-in-Humans Study of the SSTR Antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Dosimetry, Safety, and Efficacy
Richard P. Baum, Jingjing Zhang, Christiane Schuchardt, Dirk Müller, Helmut Mäcke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2021, 62 (11) 1571-1581; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.258889

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
First-in-Humans Study of the SSTR Antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Dosimetry, Safety, and Efficacy
Richard P. Baum, Jingjing Zhang, Christiane Schuchardt, Dirk Müller, Helmut Mäcke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2021, 62 (11) 1571-1581; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.258889
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 177Lu-DOTATATE in Combination with PARP Inhibitor Olaparib Is Feasible in Patients with Somatostatin-Positive Tumors: Results from the LuPARP Phase I Trial
  • Limitations of the radiotheranostic concept in neuroendocrine tumors due to lineage-dependent somatostatin receptor expression on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
  • 68Ga-SSO-120 PET for Initial Staging of Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
  • The Emergence of Somatostatin Antagonist-Based Theranostics: Paving the Road Toward Another Success?
  • The Latest Advances in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)
  • SSTR antagonist
  • 177Lu-DOTA-LM3
  • first-in-humans
  • neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs)
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire