Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis -> Clinical Therapy

Intra-Arterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with Lutetium (177Lu) DOTATATE for Neuroendocrine tumour Liver dominant metastatic disease -Initial experience

SUBHA DAS, SAURABH KUMAR, ISHITA SEN, Parul Thakral, Vineet Pant, Kanchan Sharma and Divya Manda
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 303;
SUBHA DAS
1Nuclear Medicine FORTIS MEMORIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE Gurgaon India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SAURABH KUMAR
2Interventional Radiology FORTIS MEMORIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE Gurgaon India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ISHITA SEN
1Nuclear Medicine FORTIS MEMORIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE Gurgaon India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Parul Thakral
1Nuclear Medicine FORTIS MEMORIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE Gurgaon India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vineet Pant
1Nuclear Medicine FORTIS MEMORIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE Gurgaon India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kanchan Sharma
1Nuclear Medicine FORTIS MEMORIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE Gurgaon India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Divya Manda
1Nuclear Medicine FORTIS MEMORIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE Gurgaon India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

303

Introduction: Hepatic metastases, with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), have an adverse impact on the patient’s quality of life and survival, especially in patients with refractory, unresectable, or recurrent disease. Transcatheter intra-arterial (IA) liver directed therapies, such as hepatic artery embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization are frequently used in patients. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is now well established as treatment modality of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expressing neuroendocrine tumors. Commonly practiced treatment protocol consists of multiple cycles of intravenous administration, however, in patients with liver dominant metastases there are issues of reduced tumor targeting and reduced survival. Intra-arterial administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE is an alternative novel technique aiming higher absorbed tumor dose in targeted liver lesions and to increase overall survival. The present study presents initial experience of intra-arterial administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients with Neuroendocrine tumour liver dominant metastatic disease at our institution. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed for 10 NET patients (M 31, F 24; mean age 52 y) with SSTR expressing liver metastases, who received single cycle of Intra-arterial 177Lu-DOTATATE (mean administered activity: 7.2 GBq of Lu-177) during June 2019- Oct 2019. Intra-arterial microcatheter was placed in hepatic artery and the activity was administered into the right and left hepatic artery in proportion to the tumor burden of the respective liver lobe. Whole body 177Lu-DOTATATE planar scans were obtained at 2, 24 and 96 hrs post therapy. Tumor to non-tumor ratios in liver lesions was obtained in each case. The symptomatic, biochemical (Chromogranin A) and objective imaging response (Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT) was assessed 3 months post-PRRT in all patients.

Results: Symptomatic responses and better quality of life were observed in all the 11/11 (100%) patients. Biochemically, partial response was seen in 8/11 (72.7%), stable values were seen in 2/11 (18.1%), and progression of tumor marker was seen in 1/11 (9.2%) patient. On the post therapy 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT scan, 8/11 patients (72.7%) demonstrated partial response, 2/11 stable disease (18.1%), and 1/11(9.2%) progressive disease (disease progression was seen at sites other than targeted liver lesion). Tumor to non tumor dose ratios in targeted liver lesions were in the range of 5.5 - 25 at 96 hrs. No significant adverse events were observed during and post IA administration.

Conclusions: High objective response (90.9%), with no significant adverse events were obtained in these patients post single IA administration. Intra-Arterial administration of the radiopeptide in patients with NET liver metastases seems to be a promising approach of PRRT for liver dominant metastatic disease.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intra-Arterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with Lutetium (177Lu) DOTATATE for Neuroendocrine tumour Liver dominant metastatic disease -Initial experience
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Intra-Arterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with Lutetium (177Lu) DOTATATE for Neuroendocrine tumour Liver dominant metastatic disease -Initial experience
SUBHA DAS, SAURABH KUMAR, ISHITA SEN, Parul Thakral, Vineet Pant, Kanchan Sharma, Divya Manda
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 303;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Intra-Arterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with Lutetium (177Lu) DOTATATE for Neuroendocrine tumour Liver dominant metastatic disease -Initial experience
SUBHA DAS, SAURABH KUMAR, ISHITA SEN, Parul Thakral, Vineet Pant, Kanchan Sharma, Divya Manda
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 303;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis -> Clinical Therapy

  • The Distance from Pathology to Molecular Imaging SSTR Expression Comparison in 100 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
  • Ablation Informed by Reconciliation of Stimulated Thyroglobulin and Post-Thyroidectomy Iodine Neck Uptake: Radiotheragnostic Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.
  • Role of functional imaging for response assessment with Lu177-DOTATATE therapy for neuroendocrine tumors
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis -> Clinical Therapy

Advances in Endo/Neuroendo Therapy

  • Teaching a standardized reporting system for SSTR-PET/CT - measuring the motivation, level of confidence and rate of clinical implementation of SSTR-RADS 1.0
  • Nephrotoxicity and Hematotoxicity One Year after Four Cycles of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT)
  • Not radioactive iodine-131 uptake but thyroglobulin was a prognostic factor for ablation efficacy in non-metastaticthyroid cancer
Show more Advances in Endo/Neuroendo Therapy

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire