Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research Article1990s

A Pioneering Paper That Provided a Tool for Accurate, Observer-Independent Analysis of 18F-FDG Brain Scans in Neurodegenerative Dementias (perspective on “A Diagnostic Approach in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Three-Dimensional Stereotactic Surface Projections of Fluorine-18-FDG PET” J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238–1248)

Peter Herscovitch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 140S-152S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.252510
Peter Herscovitch
PET Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Minoshima’s innovative paper included in this anniversary issue of JNM built on advances in basic research and clinical brain imaging to present an objective, automated method to assess 18F-FDG PET scans in individual patients with cognitive decline (1).

With the widespread use of 18F-FDG in oncology, it is easy to forget that 18F-FDG evolved from the seminal work of Louis Sokoloff et al. (2) to measure regional cerebral glucose metabolism in small animals with 14C-deoxyglucose and tissue autoradiography. The method provided a map of local brain function, made possible because regional cerebral glucose metabolism is coupled to neuronal, mainly synaptic, activity.

Pioneering papers published in 1979 extended the Sokoloff method to human brain imaging with PET and 18F-FDG. These papers were followed in the early 1980s by studies of regional cerebral glucose metabolism and local neuronal activity in neuropsychiatric disease. Scans in Alzheimer disease (AD) showed hypometabolism in the temporoparietal association cortex; this became recognized as the characteristic signature of the disease. At the time, quantitative analysis of brain PET images used regions of interest, comparing radiotracer values in brain regions between patient and control groups. Subsequently, more automated methods such as statistical parametric mapping (3) were developed to detect local changes by mapping PET images onto a stereotactic brain atlas. These methods facilitated comparing groups of PET images on a pixel-by-pixel basis, an approach widely used to analyze 15O-water images of regional cerebral blood flow in subjects scanned during different neurobehavioral states.

In parallel with the use of PET in brain research was the recognition of the clinical potential of 18F-FDG images interpreted visually to evaluate patients with possible AD. The work of Minoshima et al. (1), an advance ahead of its time, introduced to the clinic a quantitative automated method of image analysis termed 3-dimensional stereotactic surface projection (3D-SSP). 3D-SSP was objective, accurate, and reproducible, and facilitated the interpretation of PET scans in individual patients suspected of AD.

3D-SSP calculates the statistical significance of differences in cortical metabolic activity between a patient and controls, and projects the data onto a surface rendition of the brain. First, transaxial brain images are spatially transformed to match an anatomically defined, 3D reference brain volume from a stereotactic brain atlas. Second, peak pixel values of cortical metabolic activity values are extracted and projected onto the surface of the brain. Finally, the cortical projection of metabolic data from the patient is statistically compared pixel by pixel to a database of 18F-FDG scans in age-matched controls to identify pixels beyond the reference range. The results are displayed on the cortical surface as z scores, which indicate the SD of the difference in metabolic value between patient and control data for each pixel.

The paper has several noteworthy features. It demonstrated that for diagnostic purposes, tissue radioactivity measurements worked as well as regional cerebral glucose metabolism values, obviating measurements of arterial radioactivity to implement the Sokoloff model. 18F-FDG activity values are normalized to the value in a reference region that is minimally or not affected by the disease process, such as the thalamus, pons, or cerebellum. This normalization reduces the variability of regional data due to differences in global metabolism, scanner calibration, and other factors, and increases the sensitivity to detect regional abnormalities. The method focuses on the cerebral cortex, where the characteristic abnormalities of AD are found, reducing the amount of image data considerably and facilitating pattern recognition of abnormalities and interpretation of scans. In fact, data were presented to show that the use of 3D-SSP improved the accuracy of scan interpretation in patients with probable AD.

The 3D-SSP method was applied to other neurodegenerative dementias with a typical pattern of cortical metabolic abnormality, such as dementia with Lewy bodies and frontotemporal dementia, and its ability to differentiate these patterns was demonstrated (4). It has been used in both clinical and research applications and was adapted to SPECT imaging of cerebral blood flow and to PET/MR. Several studies comparing the accuracy of 3D-SSP to standard visual reads showed it to be at least as good as, if not better than, visual reads by expert readers and better than reads by novices. Thus, 3D-SSP helps inexperienced readers, provides confirmation for experienced readers, and can reduce variability among readers. It is a useful educational tool and offers a visual summary of scan results for referring physicians.

In a recent consensus paper supporting the use of 18F-FDG in neurodegenerative dementia, European associations of nuclear medicine and neurology deemed software tools helpful to assist visual scan reading (5). 3D-SSP software has been used for this task worldwide and is freely available for download (6). The authors’ sharing of their intellectual contribution is both commendable and appropriate, since their work was supported by grants from the U.S. government.

Long before the current interest in artificial intelligence, this pioneering paper provided a tool for accurate, observer-independent analysis of 18F-FDG brain scans in neurodegenerative dementias, in both the clinical and the research environment. Although published 25 years ago, the concepts it introduced, as well as its practical utility, remain highly relevant.

DISCLOSURE

Peter Herscovitch is an employee of the National Institutes of Health. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Minoshima S,
    2. Frey KA,
    3. Koeppe RA,
    4. Foster NL,
    5. Kuhl DE
    . A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer’s disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. J Nuc Med. 1995;36:1238–1248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sokoloff L,
    2. Reivich M,
    3. Kennedy C,
    4. et al
    . The [14C]deoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization: theory, procedure, and normal values in the conscious and anesthetized albino rat. J Neurochem. 1977;28:897–916.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Friston KJ,
    2. Frith CD,
    3. Liddle PF,
    4. Frackowiak RSJ
    . Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:690–699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Brown RKJ,
    2. Bohnen NI,
    3. Wong KK,
    4. Minoshima S,
    5. Frey KA
    . Brain PET in suspected dementia: patterns of altered FDG metabolism. Radiographics. 2014;34:684–701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Nobili F,
    2. Arbizu J,
    3. Bouwman F,
    4. et al
    . European Association of Nuclear Medicine and European Academy of Neurology recommendations for the use of brain 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in neurodegenerative cognitive impairment and dementia: Delphi consensus. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25:1201–1217.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    NEUROSTAT/3D-SSP website. https://neurostat.neuro.utah.edu/. Accessed August 3, 2020.
  • Received for publication June 25, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication July 3, 2020.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (Supplement 2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue Supplement 2
December 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Pioneering Paper That Provided a Tool for Accurate, Observer-Independent Analysis of 18F-FDG Brain Scans in Neurodegenerative Dementias (perspective on “A Diagnostic Approach in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Three-Dimensional Stereotactic Surface Projectio…
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
A Pioneering Paper That Provided a Tool for Accurate, Observer-Independent Analysis of 18F-FDG Brain Scans in Neurodegenerative Dementias (perspective on “A Diagnostic Approach in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Three-Dimensional Stereotactic Surface Projections of Fluorine-18-FDG PET” J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238–1248)
Peter Herscovitch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 140S-152S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.252510

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Pioneering Paper That Provided a Tool for Accurate, Observer-Independent Analysis of 18F-FDG Brain Scans in Neurodegenerative Dementias (perspective on “A Diagnostic Approach in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Three-Dimensional Stereotactic Surface Projections of Fluorine-18-FDG PET” J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238–1248)
Peter Herscovitch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2020, 61 (Supplement 2) 140S-152S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.252510
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • DISCLOSURE
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Small-Animal PET: A Technology That Changed Our Field (perspective on “Performance Evaluation of microPET: A High-Resolution Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate PET Scanner for Animal Imaging” J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1164–1175)
  • Promises and Challenges of Metabolic Imaging: Where Does 18F-FDG Stand in the Immunometabolism Era? (perspective on “Intratumoral Distribution of Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose In Vivo: High Accumulation in Macrophages and Granulation Tissues Studied by Microautoradiography” J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1972–1980)
Show more 1990s

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire